So you're saying they made a secret video with a hidden camera? I thought it was the distribution of the video that was the problem?NoBSU said:That's the Baylor rumor PB. Consensual sex but not consensual video at Baylor. We will have to wait for the DA to see if the rumor is valid or crap. Not sure what charge that is in Texas or if it is a felony.PartyBear said:
Did everyone consent to a video being made in the first place? What is the allegation as to that issue?
BU fball players investigated for sexual assault
106,374 Views |
687 Replies |
Last: 6 yr ago by DioNoZeus
NoBSU said:That's the Baylor rumor PB. Consensual sex but not consensual video at Baylor. We will have to wait for the DA to see if the rumor is valid or crap. Not sure what charge that is in Texas or if it is a felony.PartyBear said:
Did everyone consent to a video being made in the first place? What is the allegation as to that issue?
If the alleged victim was under 18 and the video was shared, that'll be a big problem for the alleged assailant not to mention the alleged assault of a minor. Most college students are over 18 but there's possibly a few 17 year old freshman.
I am not a source first of all. Spreading a Snapchats around without consent is the rumor so yes you are correct. Now that you mention it, that is an interesting point if the woman knew about the video but did not consent to distribution.Malbec said:So you're saying they made a secret video with a hidden camera? I thought it was the distribution of the video that was the problem?NoBSU said:That's the Baylor rumor PB. Consensual sex but not consensual video at Baylor. We will have to wait for the DA to see if the rumor is valid or crap. Not sure what charge that is in Texas or if it is a felony.PartyBear said:
Did everyone consent to a video being made in the first place? What is the allegation as to that issue?
I hate to bring out the "As a father" commentary, but if my daughter didn't object to the filing, then that would change this dad's anger focus to her.
It is a crime to distribute photos or videos without the consent of all the participants in the video even if they did consent to being filmed or photographed. If any one in the video was under 18 that is another whole problem. If anyone didnt consent to being filmed or photographed that is another whole serious problem. If we have a combination of these problems. There is a serious mess for the people who committed the crimes. Anyone who would put themselves in position of being accused of this should not be part of the team while this is investigated. If Bennett saying "we hope to have him back soon" (after the investigation) is bad. Then having these guys still is even worse. Hopefully they have not been with the team since November when this happened.
PartyBear said:
It is a crime to distribute photos or videos without the consent of all the participants in the video even if they did consent to being filmed or photographed. If any one in the video was under 18 that is another whole problem. If anyone didnt consent to being filmed or photographed that is another whole serious problem. If we have a combination of these problems. There is a serious mess for the people who committed the crimes. Anyone who would put themselves in position of being accused of this should not be part of the team while this is investigated. If Bennett saying "we hope to have him back soon" (after the investigation) is bad. Then having these guys still is even worse. Hopefully they have not been with the team since November when this happened.
It might be a misdemeanor. I m still trying to figure out how a station that transmits 45 miles and has relationships with the past can claim it was sexual assault.
They must be as short on ethics as they are on news content.
We know it was 1) not breaking news. Ashley had already reported it. 2) Not anywhere close to sexual assault. It was a poor choice and possibly a crime 3) These guys are not being touted as future starters or a future part of the team.
We do not know that it wasnt. They have sources saying it was. Perhaps a girl has changed her mind about the nature of the situation. This is what happened in all the other ones. There is an investigation.
PartyBear said:
We do not know that it wasnt. They have sources saying it was. Perhaps a girl has changed her mind about the nature of the situation. This is what happened in all the other ones. There is an investigation.
No one else has reported anything close to sexual assault.
Their sources last time were Kaz and others former fired employees. The outside media questions KWTX.
Perhaps they need to find credible sources. No one else is in panic mode but the past looking to stir up issues. I guess I would panic too if I had high hopes this event would be a major story to embarrass Baylor.
The most interesting thing to maybe come out of this little football/ equestrian party is who the cameraman was.Malbec said:So you're saying they made a secret video with a hidden camera? I thought it was the distribution of the video that was the problem?NoBSU said:That's the Baylor rumor PB. Consensual sex but not consensual video at Baylor. We will have to wait for the DA to see if the rumor is valid or crap. Not sure what charge that is in Texas or if it is a felony.PartyBear said:
Did everyone consent to a video being made in the first place? What is the allegation as to that issue?
"This is not an institution of football."
-- Dr. David Garland
-- Dr. David Garland
80sBEAR said:The most interesting thing to maybe come out of this little football/ equestrian party is who the cameraman was.Malbec said:So you're saying they made a secret video with a hidden camera? I thought it was the distribution of the video that was the problem?NoBSU said:That's the Baylor rumor PB. Consensual sex but not consensual video at Baylor. We will have to wait for the DA to see if the rumor is valid or crap. Not sure what charge that is in Texas or if it is a felony.PartyBear said:
Did everyone consent to a video being made in the first place? What is the allegation as to that issue?
Would it be a Briles' recruit? The crack staff at KWTX needs to tell us. We would hate to have harmless Rev. Wiles have to cry some more about the past.
I would add "the network" or share list. I wonder if sharing films and videos is a problem we have along with alcohol obscuring memories.80sBEAR said:The most interesting thing to maybe come out of this little football/ equestrian party is who the cameraman was.Malbec said:So you're saying they made a secret video with a hidden camera? I thought it was the distribution of the video that was the problem?NoBSU said:That's the Baylor rumor PB. Consensual sex but not consensual video at Baylor. We will have to wait for the DA to see if the rumor is valid or crap. Not sure what charge that is in Texas or if it is a felony.PartyBear said:
Did everyone consent to a video being made in the first place? What is the allegation as to that issue?
PartyBear said:
It is a crime to distribute photos or videos without the consent of all the participants in the video even if they did consent to being filmed or photographed. If any one in the video was under 18 that is another whole problem. If anyone didnt consent to being filmed or photographed that is another whole serious problem. If we have a combination of these problems. There is a serious mess for the people who committed the crimes. Anyone who would put themselves in position of being accused of this should not be part of the team while this is investigated. If Bennett saying "we hope to have him back soon" (after the investigation) is bad. Then having these guys still is even worse. Hopefully they have not been with the team since November when this happened.
^^^^ and this is exactly why I've been saying that Baylor needs to publicly state their status on the team.
AND when the DA acts as to the crime, then Baylor will usually comment.YoakDaddy said:PartyBear said:
It is a crime to distribute photos or videos without the consent of all the participants in the video even if they did consent to being filmed or photographed. If any one in the video was under 18 that is another whole problem. If anyone didnt consent to being filmed or photographed that is another whole serious problem. If we have a combination of these problems. There is a serious mess for the people who committed the crimes. Anyone who would put themselves in position of being accused of this should not be part of the team while this is investigated. If Bennett saying "we hope to have him back soon" (after the investigation) is bad. Then having these guys still is even worse. Hopefully they have not been with the team since November when this happened.
^^^^ and this is exactly why I've been saying that Baylor needs to publicly state their status on the team.
Considering the last time an equestrian member came forward with a complaint and it somehow resulted in the firing of her coach I would take the under on the likelihood this latest event was handled right
NoBSU said:AND when the DA acts as to the crime, then Baylor will usually comment.YoakDaddy said:PartyBear said:
It is a crime to distribute photos or videos without the consent of all the participants in the video even if they did consent to being filmed or photographed. If any one in the video was under 18 that is another whole problem. If anyone didnt consent to being filmed or photographed that is another whole serious problem. If we have a combination of these problems. There is a serious mess for the people who committed the crimes. Anyone who would put themselves in position of being accused of this should not be part of the team while this is investigated. If Bennett saying "we hope to have him back soon" (after the investigation) is bad. Then having these guys still is even worse. Hopefully they have not been with the team since November when this happened.
^^^^ and this is exactly why I've been saying that Baylor needs to publicly state their status on the team.
Which can take several months in the meanwhile we have alleged sexual assaulters on the team. Same old tone deaf Baylor.
If so, he is gone. Hope he has some representation. The Briles Player Purge by Matt Rhule is not quite complete.xiledinok said:80sBEAR said:The most interesting thing to maybe come out of this little football/ equestrian party is who the cameraman was.Malbec said:So you're saying they made a secret video with a hidden camera? I thought it was the distribution of the video that was the problem?NoBSU said:That's the Baylor rumor PB. Consensual sex but not consensual video at Baylor. We will have to wait for the DA to see if the rumor is valid or crap. Not sure what charge that is in Texas or if it is a felony.PartyBear said:
Did everyone consent to a video being made in the first place? What is the allegation as to that issue?
Would it be a Briles' recruit? The crack staff at KWTX needs to tell us. We would hate to have harmless Rev. Wiles have to cry some more about the past.
Briles Bad Dudes- Bad
Matt Rhule Bad Dudes- Good
"This is not an institution of football."
-- Dr. David Garland
-- Dr. David Garland
Well if he is being consistent, then this new situation should have triggered more wailing and thrashing around on the ground in a great big "show" of remorse and sorrow.xiledinok said:80sBEAR said:The most interesting thing to maybe come out of this little football/ equestrian party is who the cameraman was.Malbec said:So you're saying they made a secret video with a hidden camera? I thought it was the distribution of the video that was the problem?NoBSU said:That's the Baylor rumor PB. Consensual sex but not consensual video at Baylor. We will have to wait for the DA to see if the rumor is valid or crap. Not sure what charge that is in Texas or if it is a felony.PartyBear said:
Did everyone consent to a video being made in the first place? What is the allegation as to that issue?
Would it be a Briles' recruit? The crack staff at KWTX needs to tell us. We would hate to have harmless Rev. Wiles have to cry some more about the past.
Like this?Forest Bueller said:Well if he is being consistent, then this new situation should have triggered more wailing and thrashing around on the ground in a great big "show" of remorse and sorrow.xiledinok said:80sBEAR said:The most interesting thing to maybe come out of this little football/ equestrian party is who the cameraman was.Malbec said:So you're saying they made a secret video with a hidden camera? I thought it was the distribution of the video that was the problem?NoBSU said:That's the Baylor rumor PB. Consensual sex but not consensual video at Baylor. We will have to wait for the DA to see if the rumor is valid or crap. Not sure what charge that is in Texas or if it is a felony.PartyBear said:
Did everyone consent to a video being made in the first place? What is the allegation as to that issue?
Would it be a Briles' recruit? The crack staff at KWTX needs to tell us. We would hate to have harmless Rev. Wiles have to cry some more about the past.
Oh wait, that was kind of, sort of an admission which is not publicly regentesque.
NoBSU said:Like this?Forest Bueller said:Well if he is being consistent, then this new situation should have triggered more wailing and thrashing around on the ground in a great big "show" of remorse and sorrow.xiledinok said:80sBEAR said:The most interesting thing to maybe come out of this little football/ equestrian party is who the cameraman was.Malbec said:So you're saying they made a secret video with a hidden camera? I thought it was the distribution of the video that was the problem?NoBSU said:That's the Baylor rumor PB. Consensual sex but not consensual video at Baylor. We will have to wait for the DA to see if the rumor is valid or crap. Not sure what charge that is in Texas or if it is a felony.PartyBear said:
Did everyone consent to a video being made in the first place? What is the allegation as to that issue?
Would it be a Briles' recruit? The crack staff at KWTX needs to tell us. We would hate to have harmless Rev. Wiles have to cry some more about the past.
Oh wait, that was kind of, sort of an admission which is not publicly regentesque.
Rev. Wiles is the easiest one to pick on because he's a charismatic and is a bit different. Very harmless but definitely one to catch on the TV set.
This is utter importance to discredit Baylor. All the robes rowdy friends are out in full force while crying for equal media treatment. Strange that they would still be meddling in Baylor's affairs. There's s good timely story that will create clicks with good reporting.
How did you conclude that Wiles is very harmless?xiledinok said:
Rev. Wiles is the easiest one to pick on because he's a charismatic and is a bit different. Very harmless but definitely one to catch on the TV set.
This is utter importance to discredit Baylor. All the robes rowdy friends are out in full force while crying for equal media treatment. Strange that they would still be meddling in Baylor's affairs. There's s good timely story that will create clicks with good reporting.
57Bear said:How did you conclude that Wiles is very harmless?xiledinok said:
Rev. Wiles is the easiest one to pick on because he's a charismatic and is a bit different. Very harmless but definitely one to catch on the TV set.
This is utter importance to discredit Baylor. All the robes rowdy friends are out in full force while crying for equal media treatment. Strange that they would still be meddling in Baylor's affairs. There's s good timely story that will create clicks with good reporting.
You're speaking with an agenda, as opposed to encountering an actual conclusion.
At this point, I am thinking we should maybe invite Jimmy Swaggart to join the Baylor BOR. I think he would definitely increase the level of honesty and integrity.Robert Wilson said:57Bear said:How did you conclude that Wiles is very harmless?xiledinok said:
Rev. Wiles is the easiest one to pick on because he's a charismatic and is a bit different. Very harmless but definitely one to catch on the TV set.
This is utter importance to discredit Baylor. All the robes rowdy friends are out in full force while crying for equal media treatment. Strange that they would still be meddling in Baylor's affairs. There's s good timely story that will create clicks with good reporting.
You're speaking with an agenda, as opposed to encountering an actual conclusion.
"This is not an institution of football."
-- Dr. David Garland
-- Dr. David Garland
80sBEAR said:At this point, I am thinking we should maybe invite Jimmy Swaggart to join the Baylor BOR. I think he would definitely increase the level of honesty and integrity.Robert Wilson said:57Bear said:How did you conclude that Wiles is very harmless?xiledinok said:
Rev. Wiles is the easiest one to pick on because he's a charismatic and is a bit different. Very harmless but definitely one to catch on the TV set.
This is utter importance to discredit Baylor. All the robes rowdy friends are out in full force while crying for equal media treatment. Strange that they would still be meddling in Baylor's affairs. There's s good timely story that will create clicks with good reporting.
You're speaking with an agenda, as opposed to encountering an actual conclusion.
But he said sinned. I think that's an automatic disqualifier.
If crashing a financial institution ... makes you a top level fiscal manager. If selling sexual aids where possession of such would earn a young dorm dweller the boot or at least severe discipline (one was the "Kiss" oral sex simulator) ... makes you a moral leader to creating superchristians. If sitting silently except during leadership votes where you elect the same handful of FOBers as Regent officers/public mouthpieces for over a dozen years ... makes you a governing official. Well, why not jump in Jimmy. They killed the must be SBC member to be a regent thing. Can he bring in some money and say "sworn to secrecy" and "need to refer you to the official spokesperson" to the press? Hired.Robert Wilson said:80sBEAR said:At this point, I am thinking we should maybe invite Jimmy Swaggart to join the Baylor BOR. I think he would definitely increase the level of honesty and integrity.Robert Wilson said:57Bear said:How did you conclude that Wiles is very harmless?xiledinok said:
Rev. Wiles is the easiest one to pick on because he's a charismatic and is a bit different. Very harmless but definitely one to catch on the TV set.
This is utter importance to discredit Baylor. All the robes rowdy friends are out in full force while crying for equal media treatment. Strange that they would still be meddling in Baylor's affairs. There's s good timely story that will create clicks with good reporting.
You're speaking with an agenda, as opposed to encountering an actual conclusion.
But he said sinned. I think that's an automatic disqualifier.
NoBSU said:If crashing a financial institution ... makes you a top level fiscal manager. If selling sexual aids where possession of such would earn a young dorm dweller the boot or at least severe discipline (one was the "Kiss" oral sex simulator) ... makes you a moral leader to creating superchristians. If sitting silently except during leadership votes where you elect the same handful of FOBers as Regent officers/public mouthpieces for over a dozen years ... makes you a governing official. Well, why not jump in Jimmy. They killed the must be SBC member to be a regent thing. Can he bring in some money and say "sworn to secrecy" and "need to refer you to the official spokesperson" to the press? Hired.Robert Wilson said:80sBEAR said:At this point, I am thinking we should maybe invite Jimmy Swaggart to join the Baylor BOR. I think he would definitely increase the level of honesty and integrity.Robert Wilson said:57Bear said:How did you conclude that Wiles is very harmless?xiledinok said:
Rev. Wiles is the easiest one to pick on because he's a charismatic and is a bit different. Very harmless but definitely one to catch on the TV set.
This is utter importance to discredit Baylor. All the robes rowdy friends are out in full force while crying for equal media treatment. Strange that they would still be meddling in Baylor's affairs. There's s good timely story that will create clicks with good reporting.
You're speaking with an agenda, as opposed to encountering an actual conclusion.
But he said sinned. I think that's an automatic disqualifier.
AMEN and AMEN.
Robert Wilson said:80sBEAR said:At this point, I am thinking we should maybe invite Jimmy Swaggart to join the Baylor BOR. I think he would definitely increase the level of honesty and integrity.Robert Wilson said:57Bear said:How did you conclude that Wiles is very harmless?xiledinok said:
Rev. Wiles is the easiest one to pick on because he's a charismatic and is a bit different. Very harmless but definitely one to catch on the TV set.
This is utter importance to discredit Baylor. All the robes rowdy friends are out in full force while crying for equal media treatment. Strange that they would still be meddling in Baylor's affairs. There's s good timely story that will create clicks with good reporting.
You're speaking with an agenda, as opposed to encountering an actual conclusion.
But he said sinned. I think that's an automatic disqualifier.
Yes. Acknowledgement of your personal sin is an automatic disqualifier for BOFR membership.
NoBSU said:Like this?Forest Bueller said:Well if he is being consistent, then this new situation should have triggered more wailing and thrashing around on the ground in a great big "show" of remorse and sorrow.xiledinok said:80sBEAR said:The most interesting thing to maybe come out of this little football/ equestrian party is who the cameraman was.Malbec said:So you're saying they made a secret video with a hidden camera? I thought it was the distribution of the video that was the problem?NoBSU said:That's the Baylor rumor PB. Consensual sex but not consensual video at Baylor. We will have to wait for the DA to see if the rumor is valid or crap. Not sure what charge that is in Texas or if it is a felony.PartyBear said:
Did everyone consent to a video being made in the first place? What is the allegation as to that issue?
Would it be a Briles' recruit? The crack staff at KWTX needs to tell us. We would hate to have harmless Rev. Wiles have to cry some more about the past.
Oh wait, that was kind of, sort of an admission which is not publicly regentesque.
"In the end, we hope that more people will be led to Christianity by way of our actions. We are fine Christian soldiers. Please visit First Baptist Church Arlington and Prestonwood Baptist Church, respectively."
https://instagr.am/p/BU4fcYFhXQ8
"There were a number of us just crying out to God." - Baylor Regent Dennis Wiles
During the meeting, one of the regents started crying and pounding on the table, saying "Not my Baylor," and "Why do we have to listen to any more of this?"
During the meeting, one of the regents started crying and pounding on the table, saying "Not my Baylor," and "Why do we have to listen to any more of this?"
57Bear said:How did you conclude that Wiles is very harmless?xiledinok said:
Rev. Wiles is the easiest one to pick on because he's a charismatic and is a bit different. Very harmless but definitely one to catch on the TV set.
This is utter importance to discredit Baylor. All the robes rowdy friends are out in full force while crying for equal media treatment. Strange that they would still be meddling in Baylor's affairs. There's s good timely story that will create clicks with good reporting.
Well, unless you are a disgraced football coach that doesn't want a big church pastor preaching to his flock that might send their kids to 6A high schools, I don't see how he is a threat.
Perhaps some of us (Baylor alumni, Christians, non Christians, non Baptist, believers in Christ, non believers in Christ, non Talibaptists) just don't see how a crying clergy man or a crying for God clergy man hearing stories about bad things by bad dudes is a danger or harmful.
What has Wiles done other than cry or bawl aloud about a situation? It seems pretty shallow and only poorly raised people with little character would attack a faithful man crying to God. What's next, kick his ass?
Wiles' big church is a bit different and always draws interest from non fundamental Christians but he is harmless.
I ll let you explain to the media and public how Wiles is a dangerous and not very harmless.
Robert Wilson said:57Bear said:How did you conclude that Wiles is very harmless?xiledinok said:
Rev. Wiles is the easiest one to pick on because he's a charismatic and is a bit different. Very harmless but definitely one to catch on the TV set.
This is utter importance to discredit Baylor. All the robes rowdy friends are out in full force while crying for equal media treatment. Strange that they would still be meddling in Baylor's affairs. There's s good timely story that will create clicks with good reporting.
You're speaking with an agenda, as opposed to encountering an actual conclusion.
Agenda? I think I have displayed anger and serious doubts involving all parties in this situation. You seem to have an agenda picking on the charismatic pastor. Why the pastor? Easy target for a bully?
xiledinok said:Robert Wilson said:57Bear said:How did you conclude that Wiles is very harmless?xiledinok said:
Rev. Wiles is the easiest one to pick on because he's a charismatic and is a bit different. Very harmless but definitely one to catch on the TV set.
This is utter importance to discredit Baylor. All the robes rowdy friends are out in full force while crying for equal media treatment. Strange that they would still be meddling in Baylor's affairs. There's s good timely story that will create clicks with good reporting.
You're speaking with an agenda, as opposed to encountering an actual conclusion.
Agenda? I think I have displayed anger and serious doubts involving all parties in this situation. You seem to have an agenda picking on the charismatic pastor. Why the pastor? Easy target for a bully?
I'm not a fan of praying on a street corner to various media outlets, especially where it is done by a fiduciary who makes those comments to further personal reputation at cost to the institution.
He is more entertainment to me than serious home pastor. I m not going to go after him because his style or preaching doesn't fit my style.
It seems personal to me. What he said publicly did some damage or damaged some egos?
It seems personal to me. What he said publicly did some damage or damaged some egos?
xiledinok said:Robert Wilson said:57Bear said:How did you conclude that Wiles is very harmless?xiledinok said:
Rev. Wiles is the easiest one to pick on because he's a charismatic and is a bit different. Very harmless but definitely one to catch on the TV set.
This is utter importance to discredit Baylor. All the robes rowdy friends are out in full force while crying for equal media treatment. Strange that they would still be meddling in Baylor's affairs. There's s good timely story that will create clicks with good reporting.
You're speaking with an agenda, as opposed to encountering an actual conclusion.
Agenda? I think I have displayed anger and serious doubts involving all parties in this situation. You seem to have an agenda picking on the charismatic pastor. Why the pastor? Easy target for a bully?
I for one think he is harmless. I also think he is disingenuous. As the Pastor of a major church, he has heard and counciled every sin under the sun. I've meet him when trying to figure where to go to church in Arlington many years ago. I didn't like him, and like the song that goes "momma don't like you, and she likes everyone", that is pretty much me.
For me he had way too much salesman in him. I like people who are straight up.
Well here goes nothing:
Do you want an organization like Baylor University to be brought down by its own actions? Get a room full of self-elected church leaders together and unload years of allegations of wrongdoing (contradicting the claim of no sexual assaults at Baylor from 2011-2015), all of which is likely due to the university leadership's inaction (I'm talking bad stuff, about as bad as it gets). Unload it all at once. The church-first decision makers won't be wearing their Baylor fiduciary hats when their backs are against the wall and emotions are at a newfound high. The church-first Baylor University Regents will be wearing their church hats. Does anybody really think that the reverend Dennis Wiles or any of the rest of them care at all about the quarter billion dollar dent in Baylor University? No! It doesn't affect their congregations or their interests at all. They all get to walk away after their 3 or 9 year terms on the Baylor University Board of Regents, back to their congregations after every closed-door board meeting. "There were a number of us just crying out to God" - was it the number that was elected by the BGCT or was it the number elected by the Regents themselves? I would put my money on the BGCT Regents.
What number out of the 105 Pepper Hamilton recommendations was it that said "Hey, you might want to take a look at the election process and the structure of your Board of Regents"?
Do you want an organization like Baylor University to be brought down by its own actions? Get a room full of self-elected church leaders together and unload years of allegations of wrongdoing (contradicting the claim of no sexual assaults at Baylor from 2011-2015), all of which is likely due to the university leadership's inaction (I'm talking bad stuff, about as bad as it gets). Unload it all at once. The church-first decision makers won't be wearing their Baylor fiduciary hats when their backs are against the wall and emotions are at a newfound high. The church-first Baylor University Regents will be wearing their church hats. Does anybody really think that the reverend Dennis Wiles or any of the rest of them care at all about the quarter billion dollar dent in Baylor University? No! It doesn't affect their congregations or their interests at all. They all get to walk away after their 3 or 9 year terms on the Baylor University Board of Regents, back to their congregations after every closed-door board meeting. "There were a number of us just crying out to God" - was it the number that was elected by the BGCT or was it the number elected by the Regents themselves? I would put my money on the BGCT Regents.
What number out of the 105 Pepper Hamilton recommendations was it that said "Hey, you might want to take a look at the election process and the structure of your Board of Regents"?
"There were a number of us just crying out to God." - Baylor Regent Dennis Wiles
During the meeting, one of the regents started crying and pounding on the table, saying "Not my Baylor," and "Why do we have to listen to any more of this?"
During the meeting, one of the regents started crying and pounding on the table, saying "Not my Baylor," and "Why do we have to listen to any more of this?"
I think one of the top recommendations. What did they do about that?
This reverend doesnt seem to cry out to God much over some of our bad dudes playing for his favorite team (the Auburn Tigers) and putting them in the play off picture does he?
This reverend doesnt seem to cry out to God much over some of our bad dudes playing for his favorite team (the Auburn Tigers) and putting them in the play off picture does he?
Tommy_Lou_Ramsower said:
The church-first decision makers won't be wearing their Baylor fiduciary hats when their backs are against the wall and emotions are at a newfound high.
Yup. I'm willing to bet many of them never even fully absorbed what fiduciary meant. And if it bumps up against their personal reputations at the Sunday school or the supper club, I can tell you which is going to win out.
Tommy_Lou_Ramsower said:NoBSU said:Like this?Forest Bueller said:Well if he is being consistent, then this new situation should have triggered more wailing and thrashing around on the ground in a great big "show" of remorse and sorrow.xiledinok said:80sBEAR said:The most interesting thing to maybe come out of this little football/ equestrian party is who the cameraman was.Malbec said:So you're saying they made a secret video with a hidden camera? I thought it was the distribution of the video that was the problem?NoBSU said:That's the Baylor rumor PB. Consensual sex but not consensual video at Baylor. We will have to wait for the DA to see if the rumor is valid or crap. Not sure what charge that is in Texas or if it is a felony.PartyBear said:
Did everyone consent to a video being made in the first place? What is the allegation as to that issue?
Would it be a Briles' recruit? The crack staff at KWTX needs to tell us. We would hate to have harmless Rev. Wiles have to cry some more about the past.
Oh wait, that was kind of, sort of an admission which is not publicly regentesque.
"In the end, we hope that more people will be led to Christianity by way of our actions. We are fine Christian soldiers. Please visit First Baptist Church Arlington and Prestonwood Baptist Church, respectively."
https://instagr.am/p/BU4fcYFhXQ8
That guy sits on our BOFR yet wears an Auburn shirt. What a piece of ..... I can cut Jeffrey some slack because he's alumni, but really...an Auburn shirt?
Featured Stories
See All
Three Things Norchad Omier Brings to Baylor Basketball
by Kendall Kaut
In-Depth Preview: Baylor set to host key offensive line transfers
by Grayson Grundhoefer
8:35
2d ago
1.8k
Tweety Carter: Former Baylor Star Is the Next to Join Scott Drew's Staff
by SicEm365 Radio
Analyzing the Commitments: Baylor goes 3-for-3 during big OV weekend
by Grayson Grundhoefer
Hambone
Breaking: Baylor MBB Secures All-ACC Forward Norchad Omier from Miami in Transfer Portal
in SicEm365 Premium Insider
31
Hambone
Breaking: Baylor MBB Secures All-ACC Forward Norchad Omier from Miami in Transfer Portal
in SicEm365 Premium Insider
31
Tenacious D
Breaking: Baylor MBB Secures All-ACC Forward Norchad Omier from Miami in Transfer Portal
in SicEm365 Premium Insider
30
1outawayBear
Breaking: Baylor MBB Secures All-ACC Forward Norchad Omier from Miami in Transfer Portal
in SicEm365 Premium Insider
26
Hambone
Breaking: Baylor MBB Secures All-ACC Forward Norchad Omier from Miami in Transfer Portal
in SicEm365 Premium Insider
20