I have to give any coach 3 years to prove themselves. If there isn't major improvement after three time to move along.Gruvin said:yes, losing to Liberty is bad- the team only had 2 blow out losses, many of the games were winnable and they just didnt get it done. The team struggled last year thru lack of depth and coaching issues. This year will tell the tale, i give him this year before deciding if he is over his head or not...Stranger said:D. C. Bear said:Stranger said:D. C. Bear said:ColomboLQ said:You're right. The rest of the season would go on to show just how much of a fluke that loss was.zunooreo said:For Gus.....Gust Avrakotos said:
I don't really understand this so called badge of honor for not wanting him gone. Do u guys want a ribbon or something?
I don't tolerate losing, even in year one when it is compounded by a loss to liberty. Who loses to Liberty?
So many standing on the Liberty loss as their case. Small consolation, but we shouldn't forget that there were several anomalies in play that first game:
- Starting Anu was clearly the wrong QB (which proved out over the next few games);
- young receivers making a couple of wrong cuts in their very first game;
- Blake playing his very first game at DB;
- and a fluke scramble Flame TD by a QB experiencing the game of his entire career.
Perhaps highlights will remind us of that.
Actually, most of the losses that followed, and the lone win, showed exactly that.
So DC, are you saying those other ten losses (after Liberty) were "quality" losses?
I can't remember much good about any of them.
All the other games were data that told us about the Bears' potential. Whether they were wins or losses is beside the point. Losing to Liberty was a fluke that never should have happened, and saying otherwise is ridiculous.
I say otherwise so I'm ridiculous? Didn't look like a fluke to me. Baylor looked out coached and unprepared to me. That's all about coaching or lack of the same. Our boy Matty appears to be in over his head.