Doc Holliday said:

---

I'm literally shaking right now because I can't even exercise my right to jump on the hood of a cop car and pound on the windshield without some Nazi shooting me with a non-lethal round or tazering me. I mean what are these Nazis thinking?

Trump is trying to incite tyranny, he's violating the constitution and snatching up my best felon fugitive friends who have warrants and aren't from the United States too.

This whole thing is just like Hitler n' stuff

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

I'm literally shaking right now because I can't even exercise my right to jump on the hood of a cop car and pound on the windshield without some Nazi shooting me with a non-lethal round or tazering me. I mean what are these Nazis thinking?

Trump is trying to incite tyranny, he's violating the constitution and snatching up my best felon fugitive friends who have warrants and aren't from the United States too.

This whole thing is just like Hitler n' stuff

---

You've obviously forgotten that would-be tyrants never start by terrorizing the undesirables. They always go after the most upstanding and powerful citizens first. It's what makes them so successful in deceiving the public and lulling them into a false sense of security.

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

I'm literally shaking right now because I can't even exercise my right to jump on the hood of a cop car and pound on the windshield without some Nazi shooting me with a non-lethal round or tazering me. I mean what are these Nazis thinking?

Trump is trying to incite tyranny, he's violating the constitution and snatching up my best felon fugitive friends who have warrants and aren't from the United States too.

This whole thing is just like Hitler n' stuff

---

You've obviously forgotten that would-be tyrants never start by terrorizing the undesirables. They always go after the most upstanding and powerful citizens first. It's what makes them so successful in deceiving the public and lulling them into a false sense of security.

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

I'm literally shaking right now because I can't even exercise my right to jump on the hood of a cop car and pound on the windshield without some Nazi shooting me with a non-lethal round or tazering me. I mean what are these Nazis thinking?

Trump is trying to incite tyranny, he's violating the constitution and snatching up my best felon fugitive friends who have warrants and aren't from the United States too.

This whole thing is just like Hitler n' stuff

---

You've obviously forgotten that would-be tyrants never start by terrorizing the undesirables. They always go after the most upstanding and powerful citizens first. It's what makes them so successful in deceiving the public and lulling them into a false sense of security.

---

Is deporting illegal immigrants considered "terrorizing" the undesirables?

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

I'm literally shaking right now because I can't even exercise my right to jump on the hood of a cop car and pound on the windshield without some Nazi shooting me with a non-lethal round or tazering me. I mean what are these Nazis thinking?

Trump is trying to incite tyranny, he's violating the constitution and snatching up my best felon fugitive friends who have warrants and aren't from the United States too.

This whole thing is just like Hitler n' stuff

---

You've obviously forgotten that would-be tyrants never start by terrorizing the undesirables. They always go after the most upstanding and powerful citizens first. It's what makes them so successful in deceiving the public and lulling them into a false sense of security.

---

Is deporting illegal immigrants considered "terrorizing" the undesirables?

---

When it's done in a such a theatrically lawless manner, it is a way of terrorizing illegal immigrants and the immigrant population itself. But fair enough, I could have made my point better with more neutral language...will edit accordingly.

---

Less than four hours after holding a hearing, Judge Charles Breyer (83-year-old Clinton appointee and brother of former SC Justice Stephen) issues a 36-page opinion to support granting a temp restraining order related to Trump's deployment of the National Guard in California.… pic.twitter.com/MbgwO9oLHt

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) June 13, 2025

An absurd, rogue order. SCOTUS will stay this order before it goes into effect.

Not only is POTUS the Commander-in-Chief, but Congress authorized him to federalize the NG in 12406. Posse Comitatus doesn’t apply because they are protecting fed. property, which is within Title 10. https://t.co/V5iME1uaVm

— Eric Schmitt (@Eric_Schmitt) June 13, 2025

Mexican flags are now going up at construction sites all across the US..

👀 pic.twitter.com/2KSL1VFAh4

— American AF 🇺🇸 (@iAnonPatriot) June 11, 2025

Redbrickbear said:

---

An absurd, rogue order. SCOTUS will stay this order before it goes into effect.

Not only is POTUS the Commander-in-Chief, but Congress authorized him to federalize the NG in 12406. Posse Comitatus doesn’t apply because they are protecting fed. property, which is within Title 10. https://t.co/V5iME1uaVm

— Eric Schmitt (@Eric_Schmitt) June 13, 2025

---

A judge has ruled that being a citizen is too significant of a burden and would harm eligible voters.

Let that sink in and marinate for a moment. https://t.co/elsyGNzmIz

— Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) June 13, 2025

Redbrickbear said:

---

A judge has ruled that being a citizen is too significant of a burden and would harm eligible voters.

Let that sink in and marinate for a moment. https://t.co/elsyGNzmIz

— Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) June 13, 2025

---

The consequences of open borders pic.twitter.com/uWlwSla3ia

— Washingtons ghost (@washghost1) June 12, 2025

Redbrickbear said:

---

A judge has ruled that being a citizen is too significant of a burden and would harm eligible voters.

Let that sink in and marinate for a moment. https://t.co/elsyGNzmIz

— Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) June 13, 2025

---

historian said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

A judge has ruled that being a citizen is too significant of a burden and would harm eligible voters.

Let that sink in and marinate for a moment. https://t.co/elsyGNzmIz

— Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) June 13, 2025

---

That must be code for: "Deporting illegals hinders Dem efforts to steal elections"

---

This was me the day after my dad was deported. Do you know why I was so happy?

It was because I lived in a blue city. I watched my dad terrorize my mom and brag about how he gets away with it because the government sees him as a victim. She tried reporting him. She tried… pic.twitter.com/hL6JYqTYhS

— Based Bandita (@MissVega8888) June 12, 2025

Assassin said:

---

The consequences of open borders pic.twitter.com/uWlwSla3ia

— Washingtons ghost (@washghost1) June 12, 2025

---

Assassin said:

---

a differing view on illegal immigrants. Worth a read. From what we are seeing with thousands of immigrants, stuff like this is probably a lot more common than not.

This was me the day after my dad was deported. Do you know why I was so happy?

It was because I lived in a blue city. I watched my dad terrorize my mom and brag about how he gets away with it because the government sees him as a victim. She tried reporting him. She tried… pic.twitter.com/hL6JYqTYhS

— Based Bandita (@MissVega8888) June 12, 2025

---

historian said:

---

Assassin said:

---

a differing view on illegal immigrants. Worth a read. From what we are seeing with thousands of immigrants, stuff like this is probably a lot more common than not.

This was me the day after my dad was deported. Do you know why I was so happy?

It was because I lived in a blue city. I watched my dad terrorize my mom and brag about how he gets away with it because the government sees him as a victim. She tried reporting him. She tried… pic.twitter.com/hL6JYqTYhS

— Based Bandita (@MissVega8888) June 12, 2025

---

It's almost certainly true of the fascists' illegal poster boy, the one a senator travelled to El Salvador to have a margarita with.

---

gtownbear said:

---

quash said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

quash said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

Support for your assertion that Obama deportations were done without due process?

Again, because of the second grade level you're displaying, this is not about one individual.


I would assume he used warrants from Administrative Judges with deportation orders, and other pertinent laws like those caught just entering the country and were allowed to be removed and other means. One thing I am sure of is there were not three million civil trials for all of those Obama removed. The left just never complained because it was a democrat who did the removing rather than President Trump. When the media and the leftist groups whine and complain about an issue constantly in mass, it can bring real focus to something that otherwise would not be there, would you not agree.

As to the constant due process mantra I would ask about the January 6 defendants who the FBI spent an insane amount of time studying tens of thousands of hours of video to hunt down anyone at the Capital that day, and the Justice Department would bundle the infractions to increase jail time to years over minor misdemeanors in many cases. Furthermore, they denied many decent folks their civil rights and "due process" by keeping them in jail for up to two years awaiting trial in the seedy Washington D.C. jails. I don't recall any of you that complain about the unfair treatment of illegals who broke into the United States saying one thing about the unreasonable denial of those January 6 protesters due process rights. And they are American Citizens. Or did I miss it somehow?

---

The pardoned violent insurrectionists received due process. If it helps I'll give a short layman's version of due process: notice and an opportunity to be heard.

I am absolutely befuddled by your objection to exactly how law enforcement and prosecution works. Hours of investigative work followed by charges. Bundling infractions? Yeah, that's called a charging instrument and such bundling happens on a daily basis in every DA's office in the country.

---

https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/an-egregious-denial-of-due-process-for-jan-6-protesters/

---

Nothing biased about this, just a reporter who doesn't understand how our legal system works.
To address just one obvious bull**** claim: Defendant X didn't get most of the 41,000 hours of video. Oh noes.

Defendant X doesn't appear in all of that footage. EZ

Will some get reversals or remands? Probably some. I mean there's a thousand plus.

But we'll never know because the guy that asked for the violence pardoned the violent.

And the corrupt.

Anyone with $/influence/MAGA leanings. Sad!

---

I would remind you that the guy you say asked for the violence and pardoned the violent asked for everyone to go "peacefully" to the Capital and protest and make their voices heard. And again numerous protesters on January 6 were arrested and kept in jail, many for periods in solitary confinement, for up to two years without trial and denied bail. They were saved by President Trump's second election and his pardons realizing how many of them were overcharged for misdemeanors while denied rights most are afforded without prior criminal records.

---

quash said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

quash said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

quash said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

Support for your assertion that Obama deportations were done without due process?

Again, because of the second grade level you're displaying, this is not about one individual.


I would assume he used warrants from Administrative Judges with deportation orders, and other pertinent laws like those caught just entering the country and were allowed to be removed and other means. One thing I am sure of is there were not three million civil trials for all of those Obama removed. The left just never complained because it was a democrat who did the removing rather than President Trump. When the media and the leftist groups whine and complain about an issue constantly in mass, it can bring real focus to something that otherwise would not be there, would you not agree.

As to the constant due process mantra I would ask about the January 6 defendants who the FBI spent an insane amount of time studying tens of thousands of hours of video to hunt down anyone at the Capital that day, and the Justice Department would bundle the infractions to increase jail time to years over minor misdemeanors in many cases. Furthermore, they denied many decent folks their civil rights and "due process" by keeping them in jail for up to two years awaiting trial in the seedy Washington D.C. jails. I don't recall any of you that complain about the unfair treatment of illegals who broke into the United States saying one thing about the unreasonable denial of those January 6 protesters due process rights. And they are American Citizens. Or did I miss it somehow?

---

The pardoned violent insurrectionists received due process. If it helps I'll give a short layman's version of due process: notice and an opportunity to be heard.

I am absolutely befuddled by your objection to exactly how law enforcement and prosecution works. Hours of investigative work followed by charges. Bundling infractions? Yeah, that's called a charging instrument and such bundling happens on a daily basis in every DA's office in the country.

---

https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/an-egregious-denial-of-due-process-for-jan-6-protesters/

---

Nothing biased about this, just a reporter who doesn't understand how our legal system works.
To address just one obvious bull**** claim: Defendant X didn't get most of the 41,000 hours of video. Oh noes.

Defendant X doesn't appear in all of that footage. EZ

Will some get reversals or remands? Probably some. I mean there's a thousand plus.

But we'll never know because the guy that asked for the violence pardoned the violent.

And the corrupt.

Anyone with $/influence/MAGA leanings. Sad!

---

I would remind you that the guy you say asked for the violence and pardoned the violent asked for everyone to go "peacefully" to the Capital and protest and make their voices heard. And again numerous protesters on January 6 were arrested and kept in jail, many for periods in solitary confinement, for up to two years without trial and denied bail. They were saved by President Trump's second election and his pardons realizing how many of them were overcharged for misdemeanors while denied rights most are afforded without prior criminal records.

---

Are you seriously crying about criminal rights?

---

quash said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

quash said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

quash said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

Support for your assertion that Obama deportations were done without due process?

Again, because of the second grade level you're displaying, this is not about one individual.


I would assume he used warrants from Administrative Judges with deportation orders, and other pertinent laws like those caught just entering the country and were allowed to be removed and other means. One thing I am sure of is there were not three million civil trials for all of those Obama removed. The left just never complained because it was a democrat who did the removing rather than President Trump. When the media and the leftist groups whine and complain about an issue constantly in mass, it can bring real focus to something that otherwise would not be there, would you not agree.

As to the constant due process mantra I would ask about the January 6 defendants who the FBI spent an insane amount of time studying tens of thousands of hours of video to hunt down anyone at the Capital that day, and the Justice Department would bundle the infractions to increase jail time to years over minor misdemeanors in many cases. Furthermore, they denied many decent folks their civil rights and "due process" by keeping them in jail for up to two years awaiting trial in the seedy Washington D.C. jails. I don't recall any of you that complain about the unfair treatment of illegals who broke into the United States saying one thing about the unreasonable denial of those January 6 protesters due process rights. And they are American Citizens. Or did I miss it somehow?

---

The pardoned violent insurrectionists received due process. If it helps I'll give a short layman's version of due process: notice and an opportunity to be heard.

I am absolutely befuddled by your objection to exactly how law enforcement and prosecution works. Hours of investigative work followed by charges. Bundling infractions? Yeah, that's called a charging instrument and such bundling happens on a daily basis in every DA's office in the country.

---

https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/an-egregious-denial-of-due-process-for-jan-6-protesters/

---

Nothing biased about this, just a reporter who doesn't understand how our legal system works.
To address just one obvious bull**** claim: Defendant X didn't get most of the 41,000 hours of video. Oh noes.

Defendant X doesn't appear in all of that footage. EZ

Will some get reversals or remands? Probably some. I mean there's a thousand plus.

But we'll never know because the guy that asked for the violence pardoned the violent.

And the corrupt.

Anyone with $/influence/MAGA leanings. Sad!

---

I would remind you that the guy you say asked for the violence and pardoned the violent asked for everyone to go "peacefully" to the Capital and protest and make their voices heard. And again numerous protesters on January 6 were arrested and kept in jail, many for periods in solitary confinement, for up to two years without trial and denied bail. They were saved by President Trump's second election and his pardons realizing how many of them were overcharged for misdemeanors while denied rights most are afforded without prior criminal records.

---

Are you seriously crying about criminal rights?

---

gtownbear said:

---

quash said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

quash said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

quash said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

Support for your assertion that Obama deportations were done without due process?

Again, because of the second grade level you're displaying, this is not about one individual.


I would assume he used warrants from Administrative Judges with deportation orders, and other pertinent laws like those caught just entering the country and were allowed to be removed and other means. One thing I am sure of is there were not three million civil trials for all of those Obama removed. The left just never complained because it was a democrat who did the removing rather than President Trump. When the media and the leftist groups whine and complain about an issue constantly in mass, it can bring real focus to something that otherwise would not be there, would you not agree.

As to the constant due process mantra I would ask about the January 6 defendants who the FBI spent an insane amount of time studying tens of thousands of hours of video to hunt down anyone at the Capital that day, and the Justice Department would bundle the infractions to increase jail time to years over minor misdemeanors in many cases. Furthermore, they denied many decent folks their civil rights and "due process" by keeping them in jail for up to two years awaiting trial in the seedy Washington D.C. jails. I don't recall any of you that complain about the unfair treatment of illegals who broke into the United States saying one thing about the unreasonable denial of those January 6 protesters due process rights. And they are American Citizens. Or did I miss it somehow?

---

The pardoned violent insurrectionists received due process. If it helps I'll give a short layman's version of due process: notice and an opportunity to be heard.

I am absolutely befuddled by your objection to exactly how law enforcement and prosecution works. Hours of investigative work followed by charges. Bundling infractions? Yeah, that's called a charging instrument and such bundling happens on a daily basis in every DA's office in the country.

---

https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/an-egregious-denial-of-due-process-for-jan-6-protesters/

---

Nothing biased about this, just a reporter who doesn't understand how our legal system works.
To address just one obvious bull**** claim: Defendant X didn't get most of the 41,000 hours of video. Oh noes.

Defendant X doesn't appear in all of that footage. EZ

Will some get reversals or remands? Probably some. I mean there's a thousand plus.

But we'll never know because the guy that asked for the violence pardoned the violent.

And the corrupt.

Anyone with $/influence/MAGA leanings. Sad!

---

I would remind you that the guy you say asked for the violence and pardoned the violent asked for everyone to go "peacefully" to the Capital and protest and make their voices heard. And again numerous protesters on January 6 were arrested and kept in jail, many for periods in solitary confinement, for up to two years without trial and denied bail. They were saved by President Trump's second election and his pardons realizing how many of them were overcharged for misdemeanors while denied rights most are afforded without prior criminal records.

---

Are you seriously crying about criminal rights?

---

No I am talking about numerous Americans at the Capital on January 6 having all types of incidental charges added to misdemeanors to lengthen their potential sentences or in most cases get them to plead guilty rather than go to trial. And while all this was going on for years, many of them were denied bail so were held in the rotten D.C. jails, some in solitary confinement. So in fact these American Citizens had their civil rights taken away from them during this time due to the abuse of power by Attorney General Merrick Garland. That is what was taking place and many activist judges were culpable in agreeing with the prosecutors who said these folks were a danger to society and should remain in jail until trial even though most had no criminal record.

Now those are the facts.

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

quash said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

quash said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

quash said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

Support for your assertion that Obama deportations were done without due process?

Again, because of the second grade level you're displaying, this is not about one individual.


I would assume he used warrants from Administrative Judges with deportation orders, and other pertinent laws like those caught just entering the country and were allowed to be removed and other means. One thing I am sure of is there were not three million civil trials for all of those Obama removed. The left just never complained because it was a democrat who did the removing rather than President Trump. When the media and the leftist groups whine and complain about an issue constantly in mass, it can bring real focus to something that otherwise would not be there, would you not agree.

As to the constant due process mantra I would ask about the January 6 defendants who the FBI spent an insane amount of time studying tens of thousands of hours of video to hunt down anyone at the Capital that day, and the Justice Department would bundle the infractions to increase jail time to years over minor misdemeanors in many cases. Furthermore, they denied many decent folks their civil rights and "due process" by keeping them in jail for up to two years awaiting trial in the seedy Washington D.C. jails. I don't recall any of you that complain about the unfair treatment of illegals who broke into the United States saying one thing about the unreasonable denial of those January 6 protesters due process rights. And they are American Citizens. Or did I miss it somehow?

---

The pardoned violent insurrectionists received due process. If it helps I'll give a short layman's version of due process: notice and an opportunity to be heard.

I am absolutely befuddled by your objection to exactly how law enforcement and prosecution works. Hours of investigative work followed by charges. Bundling infractions? Yeah, that's called a charging instrument and such bundling happens on a daily basis in every DA's office in the country.

---

https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/an-egregious-denial-of-due-process-for-jan-6-protesters/

---

Nothing biased about this, just a reporter who doesn't understand how our legal system works.
To address just one obvious bull**** claim: Defendant X didn't get most of the 41,000 hours of video. Oh noes.

Defendant X doesn't appear in all of that footage. EZ

Will some get reversals or remands? Probably some. I mean there's a thousand plus.

But we'll never know because the guy that asked for the violence pardoned the violent.

And the corrupt.

Anyone with $/influence/MAGA leanings. Sad!

---

I would remind you that the guy you say asked for the violence and pardoned the violent asked for everyone to go "peacefully" to the Capital and protest and make their voices heard. And again numerous protesters on January 6 were arrested and kept in jail, many for periods in solitary confinement, for up to two years without trial and denied bail. They were saved by President Trump's second election and his pardons realizing how many of them were overcharged for misdemeanors while denied rights most are afforded without prior criminal records.

---

Are you seriously crying about criminal rights?

---

No I am talking about numerous Americans at the Capital on January 6 having all types of incidental charges added to misdemeanors to lengthen their potential sentences or in most cases get them to plead guilty rather than go to trial. And while all this was going on for years, many of them were denied bail so were held in the rotten D.C. jails, some in solitary confinement. So in fact these American Citizens had their civil rights taken away from them during this time due to the abuse of power by Attorney General Merrick Garland. That is what was taking place and many activist judges were culpable in agreeing with the prosecutors who said these folks were a danger to society and should remain in jail until trial even though most had no criminal record.

Now those are the facts.

---

Those are not facts. Misdemeanor defendants were not held for years or in solitary confinement.

---

gtownbear said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

quash said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

quash said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

quash said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

Support for your assertion that Obama deportations were done without due process?

Again, because of the second grade level you're displaying, this is not about one individual.


I would assume he used warrants from Administrative Judges with deportation orders, and other pertinent laws like those caught just entering the country and were allowed to be removed and other means. One thing I am sure of is there were not three million civil trials for all of those Obama removed. The left just never complained because it was a democrat who did the removing rather than President Trump. When the media and the leftist groups whine and complain about an issue constantly in mass, it can bring real focus to something that otherwise would not be there, would you not agree.

As to the constant due process mantra I would ask about the January 6 defendants who the FBI spent an insane amount of time studying tens of thousands of hours of video to hunt down anyone at the Capital that day, and the Justice Department would bundle the infractions to increase jail time to years over minor misdemeanors in many cases. Furthermore, they denied many decent folks their civil rights and "due process" by keeping them in jail for up to two years awaiting trial in the seedy Washington D.C. jails. I don't recall any of you that complain about the unfair treatment of illegals who broke into the United States saying one thing about the unreasonable denial of those January 6 protesters due process rights. And they are American Citizens. Or did I miss it somehow?

---

The pardoned violent insurrectionists received due process. If it helps I'll give a short layman's version of due process: notice and an opportunity to be heard.

I am absolutely befuddled by your objection to exactly how law enforcement and prosecution works. Hours of investigative work followed by charges. Bundling infractions? Yeah, that's called a charging instrument and such bundling happens on a daily basis in every DA's office in the country.

---

https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/an-egregious-denial-of-due-process-for-jan-6-protesters/

---

Nothing biased about this, just a reporter who doesn't understand how our legal system works.
To address just one obvious bull**** claim: Defendant X didn't get most of the 41,000 hours of video. Oh noes.

Defendant X doesn't appear in all of that footage. EZ

Will some get reversals or remands? Probably some. I mean there's a thousand plus.

But we'll never know because the guy that asked for the violence pardoned the violent.

And the corrupt.

Anyone with $/influence/MAGA leanings. Sad!

---

I would remind you that the guy you say asked for the violence and pardoned the violent asked for everyone to go "peacefully" to the Capital and protest and make their voices heard. And again numerous protesters on January 6 were arrested and kept in jail, many for periods in solitary confinement, for up to two years without trial and denied bail. They were saved by President Trump's second election and his pardons realizing how many of them were overcharged for misdemeanors while denied rights most are afforded without prior criminal records.

---

Are you seriously crying about criminal rights?

---

No I am talking about numerous Americans at the Capital on January 6 having all types of incidental charges added to misdemeanors to lengthen their potential sentences or in most cases get them to plead guilty rather than go to trial. And while all this was going on for years, many of them were denied bail so were held in the rotten D.C. jails, some in solitary confinement. So in fact these American Citizens had their civil rights taken away from them during this time due to the abuse of power by Attorney General Merrick Garland. That is what was taking place and many activist judges were culpable in agreeing with the prosecutors who said these folks were a danger to society and should remain in jail until trial even though most had no criminal record.

Now those are the facts.

---

Those are not facts. Misdemeanor defendants were not held for years or in solitary confinement.

---

I refer you Sam to the link below. I will look up some others as the courts threw out some of the cases against January 6 defendants.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/jul/29/john-strand-jan-6-defendant-said-he-endured-four-m/

---

gtownbear said:

---

Sam,

You do see in the article where it states that "four misdemeanor charges" right? It states that the felony charge was dismissed by the Supreme Court. I stand by my previous statement.

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

Sam,

You do see in the article where it states that "four misdemeanor charges" right? It states that the felony charge was dismissed by the Supreme Court. I stand by my previous statement.

---

What the Supreme Court did after the fact is irrelevant to your claim. He was convicted of a felony.

---