MilliVanilli said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

So all you got is ridicule? I said that I Don't want my tax $$ going to sense wars.
There are many items the budget I hate but I pay taxes and vote to get them changed.

---

All you deserve is ridicule, you're an intellectual hack who is more respectable if actually senile.

Not to mention your lame attempt to pivot from being an infanticide supporter is to pretend the screen name talking to you is a war monger.

Which is rich coming from someone that backed actual warmongers like drone happy Obama who expanded boots on the ground in Afghanistan after Bin Laden was dead, cemented ISIS in Iraq by pulling out without a strategy, and went into Libya without congressional approval...which leads to your other candidate, Hillary Clinton, Mrs. Benghazi, Iraq War, and Kosovo herself.

So if anyone here is a warmonger it's actually you. You're the only one who has expressed support for politicians that cater to endless war you swear you hate...not to mention nation-building is Wilsonian in origin and just the nanny state put into foreign policy practice.

And that's on top of the 9/11 a day you support through infanticide.

---

. Let me remind you who started those wars. Let me also remind you who still has boots on the ground in Afghanistan and who has NOT visited our troops on a war zone.
PS I got through that rebuttal without name calling. Only intellectual deficient debaters fall back on name calling

Waco1947 said:

---

PS I got through that rebuttal without name calling. Only intellectual deficient debaters fall back on name calling

---

You also failed to provide even one salient fact. It's a bit silly that you virtue signal while failing to materially address the issue.

Oldbear83 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

PS I got through that rebuttal without name calling. Only intellectual deficient debaters fall back on name calling

---

You also failed to provide even one salient fact. It's a bit silly that you virtue signal while failing to materially address the issue.

---

What is not factual?
"Let me remind you who started those wars. (W) Let me also remind you who still has boots on the ground in Afghanistan and who has NOT visited our troops on a war zone. (Fact).

Waco1947 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

PS I got through that rebuttal without name calling. Only intellectual deficient debaters fall back on name calling

---

You also failed to provide even one salient fact. It's a bit silly that you virtue signal while failing to materially address the issue.

---

What is not factual?
"Let me remind you who started those wars. (W) Let me also remind you who still has boots on the ground in Afghanistan and who has NOT visited our troops on a war zone. (Fact).

---

What difference does it make now?

GrowlTowel said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

PS I got through that rebuttal without name calling. Only intellectual deficient debaters fall back on name calling

---

You also failed to provide even one salient fact. It's a bit silly that you virtue signal while failing to materially address the issue.

---

What is not factual?
"Let me remind you who started those wars. (W) Let me also remind you who still has boots on the ground in Afghanistan and who has NOT visited our troops on a war zone. (Fact).

---

What difference does it make now?

---

The debate started with O being a failure. I responded that Trump has done nothing. It's one in a long list of blunders in Foreign Policy.

Waco1947 said:

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

PS I got through that rebuttal without name calling. Only intellectual deficient debaters fall back on name calling

---

You also failed to provide even one salient fact. It's a bit silly that you virtue signal while failing to materially address the issue.

---

What is not factual?
"Let me remind you who started those wars. (W) Let me also remind you who still has boots on the ground in Afghanistan and who has NOT visited our troops on a war zone. (Fact).

---

What difference does it make now?

---

The debate started with O being a failure. I responded that Trump has done nothing. It's one in a long list of blunders in Foreign Policy.

---

I am just playing the Killary card.

Waco1947 said:

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

PS I got through that rebuttal without name calling. Only intellectual deficient debaters fall back on name calling

---

You also failed to provide even one salient fact. It's a bit silly that you virtue signal while failing to materially address the issue.

---

What is not factual?
"Let me remind you who started those wars. (W) Let me also remind you who still has boots on the ground in Afghanistan and who has NOT visited our troops on a war zone. (Fact).

---

What difference does it make now?

---

The debate started with O being a failure. I responded that Trump has done nothing. It's one in a long list of blunders in Foreign Policy.

---

More myopia from Waco the Blind.

Kim Hak Song, Tony Kim and Kim Dong Chul say hi.

Waco1947 said:

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

PS I got through that rebuttal without name calling. Only intellectual deficient debaters fall back on name calling

---

You also failed to provide even one salient fact. It's a bit silly that you virtue signal while failing to materially address the issue.

---

What is not factual?
"Let me remind you who started those wars. (W) Let me also remind you who still has boots on the ground in Afghanistan and who has NOT visited our troops on a war zone. (Fact).

---

What difference does it make now?

---

The debate started with O being a failure. I responded that Trump has done nothing. It's one in a long list of blunders in Foreign Policy.

---

Doing nothing is seldom a blunder in foreign policy.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

PS I got through that rebuttal without name calling. Only intellectual deficient debaters fall back on name calling

---

You also failed to provide even one salient fact. It's a bit silly that you virtue signal while failing to materially address the issue.

---

What is not factual?
"Let me remind you who started those wars. (W) Let me also remind you who still has boots on the ground in Afghanistan and who has NOT visited our troops on a war zone. (Fact).

---

What difference does it make now?

---

The debate started with O being a failure. I responded that Trump has done nothing. It's one in a long list of blunders in Foreign Policy.

---

Doing nothing is seldom a blunder in foreign policy.

---

. Who said O did nothing?

Waco1947 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

PS I got through that rebuttal without name calling. Only intellectual deficient debaters fall back on name calling

---

You also failed to provide even one salient fact. It's a bit silly that you virtue signal while failing to materially address the issue.

---

What is not factual?
"Let me remind you who started those wars. (W) Let me also remind you who still has boots on the ground in Afghanistan and who has NOT visited our troops on a war zone. (Fact).

---

What difference does it make now?

---

The debate started with O being a failure. I responded that Trump has done nothing. It's one in a long list of blunders in Foreign Policy.

---

Doing nothing is seldom a blunder in foreign policy.

---

. Who said O did nothing?

---

You said Trump did nothing.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

PS I got through that rebuttal without name calling. Only intellectual deficient debaters fall back on name calling

---

You also failed to provide even one salient fact. It's a bit silly that you virtue signal while failing to materially address the issue.

---

What is not factual?
"Let me remind you who started those wars. (W) Let me also remind you who still has boots on the ground in Afghanistan and who has NOT visited our troops on a war zone. (Fact).

---

What difference does it make now?

---

The debate started with O being a failure. I responded that Trump has done nothing. It's one in a long list of blunders in Foreign Policy.

---

Doing nothing is seldom a blunder in foreign policy.

---

. Who said O did nothing?

---

You said Trump did nothing.

---

and he has not. All mouth.

Waco1947 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

PS I got through that rebuttal without name calling. Only intellectual deficient debaters fall back on name calling

---

You also failed to provide even one salient fact. It's a bit silly that you virtue signal while failing to materially address the issue.

---

What is not factual?
"Let me remind you who started those wars. (W) Let me also remind you who still has boots on the ground in Afghanistan and who has NOT visited our troops on a war zone. (Fact).

---

Congratulations. You missed the target, the wall behind it, the barn behind that, and everything associated with the point.

There's a farmer one county over who wants to have a word with you about his cow and your aim.

Oldbear83 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

PS I got through that rebuttal without name calling. Only intellectual deficient debaters fall back on name calling

---

You also failed to provide even one salient fact. It's a bit silly that you virtue signal while failing to materially address the issue.

---

What is not factual?
"Let me remind you who started those wars. (W) Let me also remind you who still has boots on the ground in Afghanistan and who has NOT visited our troops on a war zone. (Fact).

---

Congratulations. You missed the target, the wall behind it, the barn behind that, and everything associated with the point.

There's a farmer one county over who wants to have a word with you about his cow and your aim.

---

So, you did not respond with what was not factual. You simply said "You're wrong." Why am I wrong? It's all facts.

Oldbear83 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

PS I got through that rebuttal without name calling. Only intellectual deficient debaters fall back on name calling

---

You also failed to provide even one salient fact. It's a bit silly that you virtue signal while failing to materially address the issue.

---

What is not factual?
"Let me remind you who started those wars. (W) Let me also remind you who still has boots on the ground in Afghanistan and who has NOT visited our troops on a war zone. (Fact).

---

Congratulations. You missed the target, the wall behind it, the barn behind that, and everything associated with the point.

There's a farmer one county over who wants to have a word with you about his cow and your aim.

---

"Throws bottle into ocean, and wow he missed it Dizzy !, "I've never seen anybody miss the entire ocean before Pee Wee." This man has a "special" "special" talent."

Forest Bueller said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

PS I got through that rebuttal without name calling. Only intellectual deficient debaters fall back on name calling

---

You also failed to provide even one salient fact. It's a bit silly that you virtue signal while failing to materially address the issue.

---

What is not factual?
"Let me remind you who started those wars. (W) Let me also remind you who still has boots on the ground in Afghanistan and who has NOT visited our troops on a war zone. (Fact).

---

Congratulations. You missed the target, the wall behind it, the barn behind that, and everything associated with the point.

There's a farmer one county over who wants to have a word with you about his cow and your aim.

---

"Throws bottle into ocean, and wow he missed it Dizzy !, "I've never seen anybody miss the entire ocean before Pee Wee." This man has a "special" "special" talent."

---

. You still haven't said what is not factual. All you got is ridicule and name calling
*Note: This is a name calling free post It is factual and reasoned

Dear 47, I didn't read your post but wanted you to see what I was doing last night. Our trunk or treat was moved indoors, so with the terrible weather, our east Fort Worth church held this in our gym, where folks at trunk or treat are invited not only to church, but to introduce folks to the small School that is also a part of the community. Free food, free water or soda for everybody and free candy for the kids, we dress up as goofy as possible, to make the little ones feel at home and smile and have fun with them, so they will want to come back to church. This little church has snagged a good many new folks through t or t, some who have never gone to church, who just liked the way they felt there. The school also offers scholarships for low income folks, and discounts in tuition for middle income folks to make it slightly more affordable to people like me. This is very intentional, so there will be a very diverse student population.

You would call it a "conservative evangelical" school and church, because yes the actual intent of the teachings of the Bible are taught and yes the Pastor really sticks with what it actually means. The schools actually teaches a "Biblical" world view, so with the viewpoint you have chosen, you would have a very dim view on the operation.

I'm the 6'4" 310 lb, 57 year old washing machine in the picture, and little kids eat it up, joking and having fun the entire time.

Why did I take the time to go through this post? You have ceased to have an honest dialog, you don't even look at segments of society as real humans any longer, you have an extremely simplified system of demonizing anybody who disagrees with your very unorthodox way of viewing life. I'm not sure why you have taken this sudden shift, but it has occured.

Just wanted to put a human face on one of the folks, who for some reason or other, you have come to despise their particular segment of society.

Forest Bueller said:

---

Dear 47, I didn't read your post but wanted you to see what I was doing last night. Our trunk or treat was moved indoors, so with the terrible weather, our east Fort Worth church held this in our gym, where folks at trunk or treat are invited not only to church, but to introduce folks to the small School that is also a part of the community. Free food, free water or soda for everybody and free candy for the kids, we dress up as goofy as possible, to make the little ones feel at home and smile and have fun with them, so they will want to come back to church. This little church has snagged a good many new folks through t or t, some who have never gone to church, who just liked the way they felt there. The school also offers scholarships for low income folks, and discounts in tuition for middle income folks to make it slightly more affordable to people like me. This is very intentional, so there will be a very diverse student population.

You would call it a "conservative evangelical" school and church, because yes the actual intent of the teachings of the Bible are taught and yes the Pastor really sticks with what it actually means. The schools actually teaches a "Biblical" world view, so with the viewpoint you have chosen, you would have a very dim view on the operation.

I'm the 6'4" 310 lb, 57 year old washing machine in the picture, and little kids eat it up, joking and having fun the entire time.

Why did I take the time to go through this post? You have ceased to have an honest dialog, you don't even look at segments of society as real humans any longer, you have an extremely simplified system of demonizing anybody who disagrees with your very unorthodox way of viewing life. I'm not sure why you have taken this sudden shift, but it has occured.

Just wanted to put a human face on one of the folks, who for some reason or other, you have come to despise their particular segment of society.

---

More diversity in that photo then at the huffpost or 47 has been around in a month.

And you know that......how?

Waco1947 said:

---

. You still haven't said what is not factual. All you got is ridicule and name calling
*Note: This is a name calling free post It is factual and reasoned

---

You just lied, Waco. You posted an opinion, which by definition is not "factual".

As for 'reasoned', with all due respect you left that place a long time ago, son.

Doc Holliday said:

---

---

Buffalo George and Hola Caca?

Forest Bueller said:

---

Dear 47, I didn't read your post but wanted you to see what I was doing last night. Our trunk or treat was moved indoors, so with the terrible weather, our east Fort Worth church held this in our gym, where folks at trunk or treat are invited not only to church, but to introduce folks to the small School that is also a part of the community. Free food, free water or soda for everybody and free candy for the kids, we dress up as goofy as possible, to make the little ones feel at home and smile and have fun with them, so they will want to come back to church. This little church has snagged a good many new folks through t or t, some who have never gone to church, who just liked the way they felt there. The school also offers scholarships for low income folks, and discounts in tuition for middle income folks to make it slightly more affordable to people like me. This is very intentional, so there will be a very diverse student population.

You would call it a "conservative evangelical" school and church, because yes the actual intent of the teachings of the Bible are taught and yes the Pastor really sticks with what it actually means. The schools actually teaches a "Biblical" world view, so with the viewpoint you have chosen, you would have a very dim view on the operation.

I'm the 6'4" 310 lb, 57 year old washing machine in the picture, and little kids eat it up, joking and having fun the entire time.

Why did I take the time to go through this post? You have ceased to have an honest dialog, you don't even look at segments of society as real humans any longer, you have an extremely simplified system of demonizing anybody who disagrees with your very unorthodox way of viewing life. I'm not sure why you have taken this sudden shift, but it has occured.

Just wanted to put a human face on one of the folks, who for some reason or other, you have come to despise their particular segment of society.

---

That's quite an imagination to be a washing machine

Good for you on this church

Florda_mike said:

---

Forest Bueller said:

---

Dear 47, I didn't read your post but wanted you to see what I was doing last night. Our trunk or treat was moved indoors, so with the terrible weather, our east Fort Worth church held this in our gym, where folks at trunk or treat are invited not only to church, but to introduce folks to the small School that is also a part of the community. Free food, free water or soda for everybody and free candy for the kids, we dress up as goofy as possible, to make the little ones feel at home and smile and have fun with them, so they will want to come back to church. This little church has snagged a good many new folks through t or t, some who have never gone to church, who just liked the way they felt there. The school also offers scholarships for low income folks, and discounts in tuition for middle income folks to make it slightly more affordable to people like me. This is very intentional, so there will be a very diverse student population.

You would call it a "conservative evangelical" school and church, because yes the actual intent of the teachings of the Bible are taught and yes the Pastor really sticks with what it actually means. The schools actually teaches a "Biblical" world view, so with the viewpoint you have chosen, you would have a very dim view on the operation.

I'm the 6'4" 310 lb, 57 year old washing machine in the picture, and little kids eat it up, joking and having fun the entire time.

Why did I take the time to go through this post? You have ceased to have an honest dialog, you don't even look at segments of society as real humans any longer, you have an extremely simplified system of demonizing anybody who disagrees with your very unorthodox way of viewing life. I'm not sure why you have taken this sudden shift, but it has occured.

Just wanted to put a human face on one of the folks, who for some reason or other, you have come to despise their particular segment of society.

---

That's quite an imagination to be a washing machine

Good for you on this church

---

Wife came up with it, for some reason the little kids loved it. it was an incredible blessing we found this church and school. We didn't seek it, a friend brought us and basically after the first visit knew we had found a home.

Doc Holliday said:

---

---

So you prefer Tim Hortons.

Wow I did a double-take there. Good on Whataburger, but I wish they'd made the ingredients a little bigger.

Although now that I think about it, I imagine there's no way that's real.

Gunny Hartman said:

---

---

I just love how he's for open borders when his own hometown of El Paso has a Wall and has seen significant decreases in crimes since it's been up.

Telling you Beto is fraud, learn at your own risk.

Have said it all along, it has nothing to do with the fake hispanic deal.

He is an opportunist.

YoakDaddy said:

---

Gunny Hartman said:

---

---

I just love how he's for open borders when his own hometown of El Paso has a Wall and has seen significant decreases in crimes since it's been up.

---

He's not for open borders. He has made his position clear but Cruz ads continue to repeat this lie. I imagine that you would probably oppose his actual stance, it would have been nice for Cruz to just run with that.

Guys, Beto skateboards!

quash said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

Gunny Hartman said:

---

---

I just love how he's for open borders when his own hometown of El Paso has a Wall and has seen significant decreases in crimes since it's been up.

---

He's not for open borders. He has made his position clear but Cruz ads continue to repeat this lie. I imagine that you would probably oppose his actual stance, it would have been nice for Cruz to just run with that.

---

He has stated clearly that he is against the border wall which I think is being construed as wanting open borders. I agree, could be a little misleading.

Personally, I am all for protecting our borders and controlled vetting in immigration, but am not a fan of the border wall. I think that $30 billion could be better spent elsewhere.

quash said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

Gunny Hartman said:

---

---

I just love how he's for open borders when his own hometown of El Paso has a Wall and has seen significant decreases in crimes since it's been up.

---

He's not for open borders. He has made his position clear but Cruz ads continue to repeat this lie. I imagine that you would probably oppose his actual stance, it would have been nice for Cruz to just run with that.

---

He makes his position clear but I don't believe him.

Do you understand this? We don' believe leftists. Give them an inch and they take a mile.

This cartoon might help you understand: