So... at what point do Republicans realize Trump is bad at this?

106,100 Views | 1438 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by Florda_mike
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

xiledinok said:

Trump does not abort babies!
Vote Red 2020!
That's not the issue. Women's Rights is the issue. Vote Blue .
What rights are women being denied?

The Right to their own health decisions
You've yet to address what health decisions are being denied?
The decision to abort if you have your way.


Killing your unborn offspring, as a general rule, is not a "health decision." It is a decision to kill for a reason other than health.

This is ignorance: "Killing your unborn offspring, as a general rule, is not a "health decision." It is a decision to kill for a reason other than health."
It's a stupid definition of reproductive health and not what pro choice mean. You are slandering and demeaning women with this lie.


You've never screwed a woman, have you?
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

xiledinok said:

Trump does not abort babies!
Vote Red 2020!
That's not the issue. Women's Rights is the issue. Vote Blue .
What rights are women being denied?

The Right to their own health decisions
You've yet to address what health decisions are being denied?
The decision to abort if you have your way.


Killing your unborn offspring, as a general rule, is not a "health decision." It is a decision to kill for a reason other than health.

This is ignorance: "Killing your unborn offspring, as a general rule, is not a "health decision." It is a decision to kill for a reason other than health."
It's a stupid definition of reproductive health and not what pro choice mean. You are slandering and demeaning women with this lie.


Abortion is, by definition, killing unborn offspring. Pro choice is not about iOS vs Android or paper vs plastic. "Pro choice" means the right to kill your unborn offspring for whatever reason (health related or not). The vast majority of abortions, as reported by those who got them, are for reasons other than health. This is not a lie, nor is it demeaning to women to say it.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Florda_mike said:

TDS thread
It has been said TDS is believing Trump's conduct is acceptable behavior for an American president.
It's acceptable behavior for an American president as long as the president isn't Donald Trump.
We haven't had a president behave like Trump.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Florda_mike said:

TDS thread
It has been said TDS is believing Trump's conduct is acceptable behavior for an American president.
It's acceptable behavior for an American president as long as the president isn't Donald Trump.
We haven't had a president behave like Trump.
His greatest crime is his lack of subtlety, but even on that score he isn't the worst. Trump only joked about shooting someone, after all. Jackson actually did it.
fadskier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

xiledinok said:

Trump does not abort babies!
Vote Red 2020!
That's not the issue. Women's Rights is the issue. Vote Blue .
What rights are women being denied?

The Right to their own health decisions
You've yet to address what health decisions are being denied?
The decision to abort if you have your way.
That's not being denied now...and that is not a health decision unless it involves danger to the mother or infant.
you need to get pregnant first then maybe you will understand reproductive health. You are clueless
Incorrect. I don't have to get pregnant to understand pregnancy and how biology works. You don't have to personally experience something to be against something.

I've never been a slave but I'm against slavery.

Salute the Marines - Joe Biden
fadskier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Florda_mike said:

TDS thread
It has been said TDS is believing Trump's conduct is acceptable behavior for an American president.
It's acceptable behavior for an American president as long as the president isn't Donald Trump.
We haven't had a president behave like Trump.
Which, good or bad, is why many voted for him.
Salute the Marines - Joe Biden
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fadskier said:

TexasScientist said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Florda_mike said:

TDS thread
It has been said TDS is believing Trump's conduct is acceptable behavior for an American president.
It's acceptable behavior for an American president as long as the president isn't Donald Trump.
We haven't had a president behave like Trump.
Which, good or bad, is why many voted for him.


There's more condensed truth in that post than could be distilled from hundreds of others.
trey3216
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

xiledinok said:

Trump does not abort babies!
Vote Red 2020!
That's not the issue. Women's Rights is the issue. Vote Blue .
What rights are women being denied?

The Right to their own health decisions
You've yet to address what health decisions are being denied?
The decision to abort if you have your way.
That's not being denied now...and that is not a health decision unless it involves danger to the mother or infant.
you need to get pregnant first then maybe you will understand reproductive health. You are clueless
Incorrect. I don't have to get pregnant to understand pregnancy and how biology works. You don't have to personally experience something to be against something.

I've never been a slave but I'm against slavery.


I got soul, but I'm not a soldier. I support soldiers. I'm with you.
Mr. Treehorn treats objects like women, man.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
trey3216 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

xiledinok said:

Trump does not abort babies!
Vote Red 2020!
That's not the issue. Women's Rights is the issue. Vote Blue .
What rights are women being denied?

The Right to their own health decisions
You've yet to address what health decisions are being denied?
The decision to abort if you have your way.
That's not being denied now...and that is not a health decision unless it involves danger to the mother or infant.
you need to get pregnant first then maybe you will understand reproductive health. You are clueless
Incorrect. I don't have to get pregnant to understand pregnancy and how biology works. You don't have to personally experience something to be against something.

I've never been a slave but I'm against slavery.


I got soul, but I'm not a soldier. I support soldiers. I'm with you.
The killers?
trey3216
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

trey3216 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

xiledinok said:

Trump does not abort babies!
Vote Red 2020!
That's not the issue. Women's Rights is the issue. Vote Blue .
What rights are women being denied?

The Right to their own health decisions
You've yet to address what health decisions are being denied?
The decision to abort if you have your way.
That's not being denied now...and that is not a health decision unless it involves danger to the mother or infant.
you need to get pregnant first then maybe you will understand reproductive health. You are clueless
Incorrect. I don't have to get pregnant to understand pregnancy and how biology works. You don't have to personally experience something to be against something.

I've never been a slave but I'm against slavery.


I got soul, but I'm not a soldier. I support soldiers. I'm with you.
The killers?
Indeed
Mr. Treehorn treats objects like women, man.
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Florda_mike said:

TDS thread
It has been said TDS is believing Trump's conduct is acceptable behavior for an American president.
It's acceptable behavior for an American president as long as the president isn't Donald Trump.
We haven't had a president behave like Trump.
His greatest crime is his lack of subtlety, but even on that score he isn't the worst. Trump only joked about shooting someone, after all. Jackson actually did it.
Since lack of subtlelty is not a crime Trump should skate.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Florda_mike said:

TDS thread
It has been said TDS is believing Trump's conduct is acceptable behavior for an American president.
It's acceptable behavior for an American president as long as the president isn't Donald Trump.
We haven't had a president behave like Trump.
His greatest crime is his lack of subtlety, but even on that score he isn't the worst. Trump only joked about shooting someone, after all. Jackson actually did it.
Since lack of subtlelty is not a crime Trump should skate.


He will skate, or not, based on political calculations of the Senate.
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

quash said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Florda_mike said:

TDS thread
It has been said TDS is believing Trump's conduct is acceptable behavior for an American president.
It's acceptable behavior for an American president as long as the president isn't Donald Trump.
We haven't had a president behave like Trump.
His greatest crime is his lack of subtlety, but even on that score he isn't the worst. Trump only joked about shooting someone, after all. Jackson actually did it.
Since lack of subtlelty is not a crime Trump should skate.


He will skate, or not, based on political calculations of the Senate.
Political calculations that include crimes as a significant variable. Unless it is true that Republicans Senators already want Trump gone, secretly. In which case any variable gives them cover.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
fadskier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This isn't looking good for Dems

https://www.dailywire.com/news/weird-dems-went-into-urgent-meeting-expecting-impeachment-evidence-left-with-propaganda-about-dems-collusion-with-ukraine
Salute the Marines - Joe Biden
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

D. C. Bear said:

quash said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Florda_mike said:

TDS thread
It has been said TDS is believing Trump's conduct is acceptable behavior for an American president.
It's acceptable behavior for an American president as long as the president isn't Donald Trump.
We haven't had a president behave like Trump.
His greatest crime is his lack of subtlety, but even on that score he isn't the worst. Trump only joked about shooting someone, after all. Jackson actually did it.
Since lack of subtlelty is not a crime Trump should skate.


He will skate, or not, based on political calculations of the Senate.
Political calculations that include crimes as a significant variable. Unless it is true that Republicans Senators already want Trump gone, secretly. In which case any variable gives them cover.
Except voters will destroy them. They will never hold office again.
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

D. C. Bear said:

quash said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Florda_mike said:

TDS thread
It has been said TDS is believing Trump's conduct is acceptable behavior for an American president.
It's acceptable behavior for an American president as long as the president isn't Donald Trump.
We haven't had a president behave like Trump.
His greatest crime is his lack of subtlety, but even on that score he isn't the worst. Trump only joked about shooting someone, after all. Jackson actually did it.
Since lack of subtlelty is not a crime Trump should skate.


He will skate, or not, based on political calculations of the Senate.
Political calculations that include crimes as a significant variable. Unless it is true that Republicans Senators already want Trump gone, secretly. In which case any variable gives them cover.
Except voters will destroy them. They will never hold office again.
Right. Kinda like that 6% GDP you said was a correct prediction.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

D. C. Bear said:

quash said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Florda_mike said:

TDS thread
It has been said TDS is believing Trump's conduct is acceptable behavior for an American president.
It's acceptable behavior for an American president as long as the president isn't Donald Trump.
We haven't had a president behave like Trump.
His greatest crime is his lack of subtlety, but even on that score he isn't the worst. Trump only joked about shooting someone, after all. Jackson actually did it.
Since lack of subtlelty is not a crime Trump should skate.


He will skate, or not, based on political calculations of the Senate.
Political calculations that include crimes as a significant variable. Unless it is true that Republicans Senators already want Trump gone, secretly. In which case any variable gives them cover.
Except voters will destroy them. They will never hold office again.
Right. Kinda like that 6% GDP you said was a correct prediction.
With a good Fed, it would be possible.

I underestimated the swamp's ability to stonewall and attack our President.

A removal of President Trump would cause a massive uprising, civil unrest and it would destroy the Republican party for decades. Not happening.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

xiledinok said:

Trump does not abort babies!
Vote Red 2020!
That's not the issue. Women's Rights is the issue. Vote Blue .
What rights are women being denied?

The Right to their own health decisions
You've yet to address what health decisions are being denied?
The decision to abort if you have your way.
That's not being denied now...and that is not a health decision unless it involves danger to the mother or infant.
you need to get pregnant first then maybe you will understand reproductive health. You are clueless
Incorrect. I don't have to get pregnant to understand pregnancy and how biology works. You don't have to personally experience something to be against something.

I've never been a slave but I'm against slavery.


Your responses indicate you don't know the biology.
BrooksBearLives
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fadskier said:

BrooksBearLives said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

YoakDaddy said:

Waco1947 said:

xiledinok said:

Trump does not abort babies!
Vote Red 2020!
That's not the issue. Women's Rights is the issue. Vote Blue .

Please detail any rights women have lost. Thanks.

The Right to their own health decisions
How so? Give an example.


Are we going to act like bodily autonomy isn't a right?
Again, when have women been denied this right to decide what to do with their body? Be specific.


If a woman no longer wishes to be pregnant, you would tell her she has no choice.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BrooksBearLives said:

fadskier said:

BrooksBearLives said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

YoakDaddy said:

Waco1947 said:

xiledinok said:

Trump does not abort babies!
Vote Red 2020!
That's not the issue. Women's Rights is the issue. Vote Blue .

Please detail any rights women have lost. Thanks.

The Right to their own health decisions
How so? Give an example.


Are we going to act like bodily autonomy isn't a right?
Again, when have women been denied this right to decide what to do with their body? Be specific.


If a woman no longer wishes to be pregnant, you would tell her she has no choice.
That's a lot better than bloodshed.

Keep voting Dem and we will have 8-9 month term babies ripped from the womb and executed by the thousands.
fadskier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

xiledinok said:

Trump does not abort babies!
Vote Red 2020!
That's not the issue. Women's Rights is the issue. Vote Blue .
What rights are women being denied?

The Right to their own health decisions
You've yet to address what health decisions are being denied?
The decision to abort if you have your way.
That's not being denied now...and that is not a health decision unless it involves danger to the mother or infant.
you need to get pregnant first then maybe you will understand reproductive health. You are clueless
Incorrect. I don't have to get pregnant to understand pregnancy and how biology works. You don't have to personally experience something to be against something.

I've never been a slave but I'm against slavery.


Your responses indicate you don't know the biology.
Women get pregnant, men don't. Biology is pretty simple. If you have sex, protected or otherwise the women could get pregnant. Do you dispute?
Salute the Marines - Joe Biden
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

D. C. Bear said:

quash said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Florda_mike said:

TDS thread
It has been said TDS is believing Trump's conduct is acceptable behavior for an American president.
It's acceptable behavior for an American president as long as the president isn't Donald Trump.
We haven't had a president behave like Trump.
His greatest crime is his lack of subtlety, but even on that score he isn't the worst. Trump only joked about shooting someone, after all. Jackson actually did it.
Since lack of subtlelty is not a crime Trump should skate.


He will skate, or not, based on political calculations of the Senate.
Political calculations that include crimes as a significant variable. Unless it is true that Republicans Senators already want Trump gone, secretly. In which case any variable gives them cover.
Except voters will destroy them. They will never hold office again.
Right. Kinda like that 6% GDP you said was a correct prediction.
With a good Fed, it would be possible.

I underestimated the swamp's ability to stonewall and attack our President.

A removal of President Trump would cause a massive uprising, civil unrest and it would destroy the Republican party for decades. Not happening.
LOL.

Either you give presidents credit for the economy (you) or you don't (me). Now you want it both ways: all the good was Trump; anything bad is Fed, the media, Democrats, swamp, etc.

There are some as think removing Trump would restore the GOP.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
fadskier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BrooksBearLives said:

fadskier said:

BrooksBearLives said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

YoakDaddy said:

Waco1947 said:

xiledinok said:

Trump does not abort babies!
Vote Red 2020!
That's not the issue. Women's Rights is the issue. Vote Blue .

Please detail any rights women have lost. Thanks.

The Right to their own health decisions
How so? Give an example.


Are we going to act like bodily autonomy isn't a right?
Again, when have women been denied this right to decide what to do with their body? Be specific.


If a woman no longer wishes to be pregnant, you would tell her she has no choice.
She had a choice. She's already made it.

Using your logic, if someone no longer wanted to be a parent, they could kill their child.

Sorry, I'm just asking women to be more responsible with their choices. Be pro-choice before you act.

Salute the Marines - Joe Biden
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

D. C. Bear said:

quash said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

Florda_mike said:

TDS thread
It has been said TDS is believing Trump's conduct is acceptable behavior for an American president.
It's acceptable behavior for an American president as long as the president isn't Donald Trump.
We haven't had a president behave like Trump.
His greatest crime is his lack of subtlety, but even on that score he isn't the worst. Trump only joked about shooting someone, after all. Jackson actually did it.
Since lack of subtlelty is not a crime Trump should skate.


He will skate, or not, based on political calculations of the Senate.
Political calculations that include crimes as a significant variable. Unless it is true that Republicans Senators already want Trump gone, secretly. In which case any variable gives them cover.
Except voters will destroy them. They will never hold office again.
Right. Kinda like that 6% GDP you said was a correct prediction.
With a good Fed, it would be possible.

I underestimated the swamp's ability to stonewall and attack our President.

A removal of President Trump would cause a massive uprising, civil unrest and it would destroy the Republican party for decades. Not happening.
LOL.

Either you give presidents credit for the economy (you) or you don't (me). Now you want it both ways: all the good was Trump; anything bad is Fed, the media, Democrats, swamp, etc.

There are some as think removing Trump would restore the GOP.
Republican voters don't want to restore the GOP. Only RINO's like Mitt Romney and stupid boomers who think they have to be politically correct to survive.
GoneGirl
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

D. C. Bear said:

quash said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

We haven't had a president behave like Trump.
His greatest crime is his lack of subtlety, but even on that score he isn't the worst. Trump only joked about shooting someone, after all. Jackson actually did it.
Since lack of subtlelty is not a crime Trump should skate.


He will skate, or not, based on political calculations of the Senate.
Political calculations that include crimes as a significant variable. Unless it is true that Republicans Senators already want Trump gone, secretly. In which case any variable gives them cover.
Except voters will destroy them. They will never hold office again.
Right. Kinda like that 6% GDP you said was a correct prediction.
With a good Fed, it would be possible.

I underestimated the swamp's ability to stonewall and attack our President.

A removal of President Trump would cause a massive uprising, civil unrest and it would destroy the Republican party for decades. Not happening.
LOL.

Either you give presidents credit for the economy (you) or you don't (me). Now you want it both ways: all the good was Trump; anything bad is Fed, the media, Democrats, swamp, etc.

There are some as think removing Trump would restore the GOP.
We have 8 or 9 parties under the umbrella of 2 parties.

Trump Republicans, neocons (to the extent those still exist), fiscally and socially conservative Chamber-of-Commerce corporate Republicans like Romney and Flake, evangelicals whose main concerns are social issues whom the GOP has embraced to get enough votes to elect guys like Trump, and moderate Republicans who like conservative fiscal and tax policies but not the anti-gay, anti-abortion, anti-sex-education turn the GOP has taken = today's GOP. The Trump voices are the loudest, but the Romney voters are still out there. The deficit hawks are off the radar screen right now,but they'll show up again the day after the next Democrat takes office.

The Democrats = Bernie voters who want a harder turn to the left, Biden moderates who want a middle road without the anti-gay, anti-brown-immigrant bigotry and female-body-control policies advocated by the GOP (I'd include Harris in this group), "big idea" guys like Andrew Yang who want to create a rising tide that will lift all boats because they perceive, accurately, that "trickle down" doesn't work (but at least they're out there with new ideas, which no one in the GOP is offering because wall-building, stacking the courts, selling us out to the Saudis, the Russians and the Chinese (McConnell had better not utter a PEEP about Hunter Biden being as how he's married to China Rose), and defending Trump's latest misdeeds have proved to be more than a full-time job) , and a host of minority politicians whose only hope for a substantive political career is as Democrats because Republicans have made the same bad bargain with white nationalists that they made with evangelicals.

Then there are libertarians. My hope is that the GOP's shameless deficit spending combined with its attacks on civil liberties will shift more libertarian votes to Democrats, or at least away from Trump Republicans, who have been only too happy to trade liberty for obedience to the dear leader. Impeachment of this criminal can't happen soon enough.
fadskier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jinx 2 said:

quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

D. C. Bear said:

quash said:

Sam Lowry said:

TexasScientist said:

We haven't had a president behave like Trump.
His greatest crime is his lack of subtlety, but even on that score he isn't the worst. Trump only joked about shooting someone, after all. Jackson actually did it.
Since lack of subtlelty is not a crime Trump should skate.


He will skate, or not, based on political calculations of the Senate.
Political calculations that include crimes as a significant variable. Unless it is true that Republicans Senators already want Trump gone, secretly. In which case any variable gives them cover.
Except voters will destroy them. They will never hold office again.
Right. Kinda like that 6% GDP you said was a correct prediction.
With a good Fed, it would be possible.

I underestimated the swamp's ability to stonewall and attack our President.

A removal of President Trump would cause a massive uprising, civil unrest and it would destroy the Republican party for decades. Not happening.
LOL.

Either you give presidents credit for the economy (you) or you don't (me). Now you want it both ways: all the good was Trump; anything bad is Fed, the media, Democrats, swamp, etc.

There are some as think removing Trump would restore the GOP.
We have 8 or 9 parties under the umbrella of 2 parties.

Trump Republicans, neocons (to the extent those still exist), fiscally and socially conservative Chamber-of-Commerce corporate Republicans like Romney and Flake, evangelicals whose main concerns are social issues whom the GOP has embraced to get enough votes to elect guys like Trump, and moderate Republicans who like conservative fiscal and tax policies but not the anti-gay, anti-abortion, anti-sex-education turn the GOP has taken = today's GOP. The Trump voices are the loudest, but the Romney voters are still out there. The deficit hawks are off the radar screen right now,but they'll show up again the day after the next Democrat takes office.

The Democrats = Bernie voters who want a harder turn to the left, Biden moderates who want a middle road without the anti-gay, anti-brown-immigrant bigotry and female-body-control policies advocated by the GOP (I'd include Harris in this group), "big idea" guys like Andrew Yang who want to create a rising tide that will lift all boats because they perceive, accurately, that "trickle down" doesn't work (but at least they're out there with new ideas, which no one in the GOP is offering because wall-building, stacking the courts, selling us out to the Saudis, the Russians and the Chinese (McConnell had better not utter a PEEP about Hunter Biden being as how he's married to China Rose), and defending Trump's latest misdeeds have proved to be more than a full-time job) , and a host of minority politicians whose only hope for a substantive political career is as Democrats because Republicans have made the same bad bargain with white nationalists that they made with evangelicals.

Then there are libertarians. My hope is that the GOP's shameless deficit spending combined with its attacks on civil liberties will shift more libertarian votes to Democrats, or at least away from Trump Republicans, who have been only too happy to trade liberty for obedience to the dear leader. Impeachment of this criminal can't happen soon enough.
Trump is not anti-Gay
Trump is not anti-brown immigrant
Trump does not want to control female body parts

Replace Trump with your generalized "republicans" and that's not true either. Sue there are some people that that are...but I think you need to educate yourself on the word "anti" because you have no idea what it means.

Do you ever say anything nice about anyone? You have got to be the most self-absorbed, unfriendly, unkind person I've ever "met." I truly hope you find happiness in something.
Salute the Marines - Joe Biden
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jinx 2 said:

quash said:




There are some as think removing Trump would restore the GOP.


Then there are libertarians. My hope is that the GOP's shameless deficit spending combined with its attacks on civil liberties will shift more libertarian votes to Democrats,
Those libertarians who have voted Republican in the past are not going to vote Democratic over spending. A dozen other issues maybe, but that's frying pan to fire stuff right there.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
$125,000,000 bad.

- BUmma
Go Bears!
GoneGirl
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fadskier said:

Jinx 2 said:

quash said:

LOL.

Either you give presidents credit for the economy (you) or you don't (me). Now you want it both ways: all the good was Trump; anything bad is Fed, the media, Democrats, swamp, etc.

There are some as think removing Trump would restore the GOP.
We have 8 or 9 parties under the umbrella of 2 parties.

Trump Republicans, neocons (to the extent those still exist), fiscally and socially conservative Chamber-of-Commerce corporate Republicans like Romney and Flake, evangelicals whose main concerns are social issues whom the GOP has embraced to get enough votes to elect guys like Trump, and moderate Republicans who like conservative fiscal and tax policies but not the anti-gay, anti-abortion, anti-sex-education turn the GOP has taken = today's GOP. The Trump voices are the loudest, but the Romney voters are still out there. The deficit hawks are off the radar screen right now,but they'll show up again the day after the next Democrat takes office.

The Democrats = Bernie voters who want a harder turn to the left, Biden moderates who want a middle road without the anti-gay, anti-brown-immigrant bigotry and female-body-control policies advocated by the GOP (I'd include Harris in this group), "big idea" guys like Andrew Yang who want to create a rising tide that will lift all boats because they perceive, accurately, that "trickle down" doesn't work (but at least they're out there with new ideas, which no one in the GOP is offering because wall-building, stacking the courts, selling us out to the Saudis, the Russians and the Chinese (McConnell had better not utter a PEEP about Hunter Biden being as how he's married to China Rose), and defending Trump's latest misdeeds have proved to be more than a full-time job) , and a host of minority politicians whose only hope for a substantive political career is as Democrats because Republicans have made the same bad bargain with white nationalists that they made with evangelicals.

Then there are libertarians. My hope is that the GOP's shameless deficit spending combined with its attacks on civil liberties will shift more libertarian votes to Democrats, or at least away from Trump Republicans, who have been only too happy to trade liberty for obedience to the dear leader. Impeachment of this criminal can't happen soon enough.
Trump is not anti-Gay
Trump is not anti-brown immigrant
Trump does not want to control female body parts

Replace Trump with your generalized "republicans" and that's not true either. Sue there are some people that that are...but I think you need to educate yourself on the word "anti" because you have no idea what it means.

Do you ever say anything nice about anyone? You have got to be the most self-absorbed, unfriendly, unkind person I've ever "met." I truly hope you find happiness in something.
The GOP opposes civil rights for LGBT people and abortion and wants to limit contraception options to only those approved of by certain conservative religious groups.

Trump is the putative leader of the GOP.

I'm also mystified as to how you can say with a straight face that "Trump is not anti-brown immigrant" when he describes countries populated by brown people at ****hole countries and wants to build a wall, complete with alligator-filled moats, to keep refugees out of the U.S., when he implemented a travel ban that was rejected twice by federal courts for targeting brown people from Muslim countries, and when he wants to eliminate asylum rights we currently grant.

I have posted on this forum as "Jinx" for more than 10 years, but I have a life outside this forum. Believe it or not, I have sing in a church choir, walk my dog twice a day, have 2 grown daughters who have launched their own careers, have friends of all political persuasions (although, since Trump, I don't talk about certain policies with some of them), volunteer with a church ministry that feeds homeless and low-income people in the neighborhood surrounding the church, volunteer on an affordable housing task force with a nonprofit in my city as a policy-writer, and lead a happy and fulfilling life.

I oppose Trump because I want to continue to live in a country where dissent and disagreement over political policies are tolerated. Trump is the least tolerant president we've had during my lifetime of more than 60 years. He's a danger to democracy. So, yes, I'm angry at supporters who think, as one poster said within the past week on this forum, that democracy is overrated, and who want to hold Trump above/outside/beyond the laws that have applied to every other president and public official since I've been a voting adult. IMO, the rule of law, upholding the constitution and accountability are key to our system of government. Those of you who defend Trump regardless of how low he stoops and how obvious it is that he's engaged in criminal or even just sketchy behavior are, IMO, unAmerican.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jinx 2 said:


Then there are libertarians. My hope is that the GOP's shameless deficit spending combined with its attacks on civil liberties will shift more libertarian votes to Democrats, or at least away from Trump Republicans, who have been only too happy to trade liberty for obedience to the dear leader. Impeachment of this criminal can't happen soon enough.
I'd say Democrats are attacking civil liberties when they confiscate guns, compel the baking of cakes with abhorrent political messages (messages that violate the conscience fo the baker), advocate affirmative action (higher bar for Asians and whites), etc
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jinx 2 said:

Those of you who defend Trump regardless of how low he stoops and how obvious it is that he's engaged in criminal or even just sketchy behavior are, IMO, unAmerican.
I don't defend Trump regardless. I just won't vote for gun confiscating, baby killing, welfare and free health care for illegal aliens, take away my private insurance, pro-reparations, pro-affirmative action socialist.

If I vote for Trump next year, it's your fault for not giving us a choice.
GoneGirl
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Jinx 2 said:


Then there are libertarians. My hope is that the GOP's shameless deficit spending combined with its attacks on civil liberties will shift more libertarian votes to Democrats, or at least away from Trump Republicans, who have been only too happy to trade liberty for obedience to the dear leader. Impeachment of this criminal can't happen soon enough.
I'd say Democrats are attacking civil liberties when they confiscate guns, compel the baking of cakes with abhorrent political messages (messages that violate the conscience fo the baker), advocate affirmative action (higher bar for Asians and whites), etc
Republicans on this site had a FIT when a restaurant refused service to Sarah Sanders because the owner and staff were bothered that she lied to the American people on a daily basis to support Trump.

I'm OK with allowing bakers to be bigots. Perhaps a better course of action would have been for the couple spurned by the bakery to tell their friends what happened and see how that impacted the bakery's business. (In my state, outside of a couple of cities, business probably would increase.)

Who confiscated guns from anyone? Where did that happen? Certainly not in my state.

I'm disgusted by what we allow people to buy and carry starting at age 18, but I've given up on that issue. I do, however, consider that Republicans think frequent mass shootings are acceptable collateral damage when I vote--although the GOP's denial of climate change far outweighs even that awfulness.
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jinx 2 said:




I have posted on this forum as "Jinx" for more than 10 years, but I have a a small shred of a meagre life outside this wretched knee-jerk conservative-infested forum on which I derive great pleasure flagellating meselfs quite literally with a syrian hand-beaded scourge purchased froma bazaar in aleppo unceasingly during breaks in my day. Believe it or not..... I ... walk my dog twice a day, ...'
bezus?

the canine jesus?

PA.

- UL

BID.
Go Bears!
GoneGirl
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Jinx 2 said:

Those of you who defend Trump regardless of how low he stoops and how obvious it is that he's engaged in criminal or even just sketchy behavior are, IMO, unAmerican.
I don't defend Trump regardless. I just won't vote for gun confiscating, baby killing, welfare and free health care for illegal aliens, take away my private insurance, pro-reparations, pro-affirmative action socialist.

If I vote for Trump next year, it's your fault for not giving us a choice.
Then you'll vote from a platform of ignorance fed by right-wing news organizations promoting specious narratives about baby-killing (when abortion in the U.S. is at an all-time low mainly because more women are using effective long-term contraception) and gun confiscation (if that's happening, I'm certainly not aware of it).

I'm OK with welfare--I don't want to live in a country where kids and single mothers starve and old people eat cat food. I'm willing to pay taxes to ensure people have food and a roof over their heads.

As far as free healthcare for immigrants, where is that happening? Again, not in my city. Our painter is a legal Mexican immigrant with a green card, and I had to take him to the dentist and pay for his care when one of his teeth died.

We also have a policy of treating people who show up at the E.R. regardless of their ability to pay (or, at least we did in the past). If you want to change that, I urge you to get your party--the Trump arm of the GOP--to campaign vigorously to eliminate one of the few remaining compassionate policies vis a vis healthcare that we have in this country. Maybe that selfish, misery, mean spirited attitude will speak loudly enough to brand the GOP as the "me and me only" party. A country led by such a party and people with such a low level of kindness and compassion isn't going to be good for anyone, including you. But you'll have to learn that the hard way.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jinx 2 said:

Osodecentx said:

Jinx 2 said:


Then there are libertarians. My hope is that the GOP's shameless deficit spending combined with its attacks on civil liberties will shift more libertarian votes to Democrats, or at least away from Trump Republicans, who have been only too happy to trade liberty for obedience to the dear leader. Impeachment of this criminal can't happen soon enough.
I'd say Democrats are attacking civil liberties when they confiscate guns, compel the baking of cakes with abhorrent political messages (messages that violate the conscience fo the baker), advocate affirmative action (higher bar for Asians and whites), etc
Republicans on this site had a FIT when a restaurant refused service to Sarah Sanders because the owner and staff were bothered that she lied to the American people on a daily basis to support Trump.
It is inappropriate, at the least, for citizens to be harassed in public places. I think Harry Reid, Schumer, Schiff and other have lied to the American people. They shouldn't be driven from a restaurant.

I'm OK with allowing bakers to be bigots. Perhaps a better course of action would have been for the couple spurned by the bakery to tell their friends what happened and see how that impacted the bakery's business. (In my state, outside of a couple of cities, business probably would increase.)
I agree, do any Democrat presidential candidates?

Who confiscated guns from anyone? Where did that happen? Certainly not in my state.
See Beto, Kamala, Warren comments

I'm disgusted by what we allow people to buy and carry starting at age 18, but I've given up on that issue.
Not sure what this means, but if it refers to carrying guns I think it is inappropriate for an 18 y/o to be allowed to carry a firearm and they can't legally do so in Texas

I do, however, consider that Republicans think frequent mass shootings are acceptable collateral damage when I vote--although the GOP's denial of climate change far outweighs even that awfulness.
I don't think mass shootings are acceptable, but gun confiscation isn't the answer.
My answers are in bold above.
Look, I'm not voting for any of the Democrat candidates who have announced so far and you won't be voting for any Republican candidate down ballot.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.