Sam Lowry said:
Canon said:
Sam Lowry said:
Canon said:
Sam Lowry said:
Oldbear83 said:
Sam Lowry said:
Oldbear83 said:
Sam Lowry said:
Oldbear83 said:
Sam Lowry said:
Oldbear83 said:
Sam Lowry said:
Oldbear83 said:
Sam: "Besides which I couldn't care less about Biden."
Aside from your posts making clear he's your boy ...
Quote one.
<chuckle> Get back to me when you treat Trump supporters with the same respect you treat people like Liz Cheney or Chris Cuomo
Have I mistreated you?
Deflection a la Biden, I see.
Sorry. So about that quote?
So, about my point?
Please support it.
Evasion from Sam as now usual for him. I truly miss Rational Sam, wonder what happened?
Quote from me supporting Biden. Take your time.
If there are two choices (which, realistically, is all there are) and you condemn one choice, in metered verse using backup singers (which you have), you are supporting the remaining choice. One cannot come to a crossroads, claim 'there be monsters' to the right and not accept the defacto support for going left.
You and every other never Trumper supported and continue to support socialist policies and politicians. Just own it.
Thank you. It's BS, but at least it's honest BS. Hopefully the cowards will take a lesson.
RINOs have indeed always been cowards...far more afraid of upsetting the left than of upsetting conservative voters. The only policies you lot fight tooth and nail against are conservative policies, whilst capitulating to virtually ever left wing power grab for decades.
Well, congratulations. You've just replaced a conservative leader with one who resisted Trump's legislative efforts but supported his temper tantrum.
Policy before personality, indeed.
We replaced a conservative leader who lost the confidence of her caucus because she was unable to get past her own gargantuan egocentrism and represent the overwhelming sentiments of her district and caucus. Churchill crossed the aisle when he found himself at odds with the rest of his caucus; Cheney should do the same. If she's not ready to do that, she should at minimum have resigned her leadership position rather than use it to undermine an otherwise united caucus. But she didn't do that. And in so doing became the megalomaniac she accuses Trump to be.
The new leader, on the other hand, had no problem balancing the task of representing her district on policy AND playing team ball with her caucus on partisan issues. She was willing to fight for a man who's policies she was not always able to support. And she fought very well, too. Gained my respect, even though I occasionally disagree with her on policy positions. She earned this promotion.
Lost in the debate is the reality that the Conference Chairmanship is often filled by a moderate, for balance within the caucus....to give moderates in the GOP caucus a stake in leadership. So this change actually enlarges the tent, so to speak.
The virtue posture is a hard habit to break. But if you keep trying, you might be able to shake it.