U.S Senate races

49,748 Views | 1187 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Osodecentx
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NYT/Sienna



Historically, the breakeven point is +4 Dems. Anything less than +4 Dems leads to Republican gains..
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:


I just cant see Mark Kelly winning with a base in AZ like this..
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?


No enthusiasm in one of the Dems biggest voting blocks..
BearFan33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

I've seen the internal polling numbers for Republicans in Georgia. It's almost even between Warnock and Walker. But for what it's worth that same internal polling was UGLY just 60 days ago so the trend is very positive for Walker. He also did surprisingly well in the debate. While it wasn't Lincoln-Douglas, what is a weak point for him and could have been a killer this close to the election turned out to be a positive for him and harmed Warnock.

Kemp is believed to be a lock majority with no run off.
Since their (Kemp and Raffensperger) names are on the ballot, I expect a clean election in Georgia this time. Walker may benefit from that.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We will see what happens. I take most polls with a grain of salt.

Common sense tells me the GOP should do very well. The gap seems to continually grow between what the establishment-twatterati think is important and what average people think is important. No one in my circle is talking about January 6 or overdue library books ... they are worried about inflation and fentanyl flooding across the border as well as surging crime rates and the obsession with grooming children.
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearFan33 said:

ATL Bear said:

I've seen the internal polling numbers for Republicans in Georgia. It's almost even between Warnock and Walker. But for what it's worth that same internal polling was UGLY just 60 days ago so the trend is very positive for Walker. He also did surprisingly well in the debate. While it wasn't Lincoln-Douglas, what is a weak point for him and could have been a killer this close to the election turned out to be a positive for him and harmed Warnock.

Kemp is believed to be a lock majority with no run off.
Since their (Kemp and Raffensperger) names are on the ballot, I expect a clean election in Georgia this time. Walker may benefit from that.
We won't have (as many) absentee ballot shenanigans, that's for sure.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

BearFan33 said:

ATL Bear said:

I've seen the internal polling numbers for Republicans in Georgia. It's almost even between Warnock and Walker. But for what it's worth that same internal polling was UGLY just 60 days ago so the trend is very positive for Walker. He also did surprisingly well in the debate. While it wasn't Lincoln-Douglas, what is a weak point for him and could have been a killer this close to the election turned out to be a positive for him and harmed Warnock.

Kemp is believed to be a lock majority with no run off.
Since their (Kemp and Raffensperger) names are on the ballot, I expect a clean election in Georgia this time. Walker may benefit from that.
We won't have (as many) absentee ballot shenanigans, that's for sure.
Hopefully. Read last week Pennsylvania plans to ignore SCOTUS and continue its illegal election procedures from 2020.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

ATL Bear said:

BearFan33 said:

ATL Bear said:

I've seen the internal polling numbers for Republicans in Georgia. It's almost even between Warnock and Walker. But for what it's worth that same internal polling was UGLY just 60 days ago so the trend is very positive for Walker. He also did surprisingly well in the debate. While it wasn't Lincoln-Douglas, what is a weak point for him and could have been a killer this close to the election turned out to be a positive for him and harmed Warnock.

Kemp is believed to be a lock majority with no run off.
Since their (Kemp and Raffensperger) names are on the ballot, I expect a clean election in Georgia this time. Walker may benefit from that.
We won't have (as many) absentee ballot shenanigans, that's for sure.
Hopefully. Read last week Pennsylvania plans to ignore SCOTUS and continue its illegal election procedures from 2020.
would be funny if congress refuses to seat the new senator from PA for not following fed election law
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti said:


He could have really nailed the question if he would just said (a) we are going to forgive even more student debt or (b) the other party doesn't like killing babies.

Ursus Americanus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

I've seen the internal polling numbers for Republicans in Georgia. It's almost even between Warnock and Walker. But for what it's worth that same internal polling was UGLY just 60 days ago so the trend is very positive for Walker. He also did surprisingly well in the debate. While it wasn't Lincoln-Douglas, what is a weak point for him and could have been a killer this close to the election turned out to be a positive for him and harmed Warnock.

Kemp is believed to be a lock majority with no run off.
Kemp may win by as much as Abbott and DeSantis.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why is cocaine mitch spending millions in Alaska? That money could be better spent in a battleground state to help gain senate majority instead of a fight between two GOP canidates..
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

Why is cocaine mitch spending millions in Alaska? That money could be better spent in a battleground state to help gain senate majority instead of a fight between two GOP canidates..
The triage for national party campaign committees when it comes to spending money in elections is as follows:

1st priority is to defend incumbents.
2nd priority is to compete for open seats.
3rd priority is to compete for seats held by the opposition.

Mitch is defending a member of his caucus. Doing so binds the incumbent candidate to him. Also tells the rest of his caucus he will not abandon them.

Not defending the spend. Hope Tshibaka wins. And if she does, as long as she does not become a Liz Cheney type attack dog going after Mitch, Mitch will be there to support her in 2028 if necessary.

4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?


How is this possible? We were so strong and now we are losing! Send money quick!! - Dems
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouGov/Yahoo: Midterms

Definitely will vote:
73% of Republicans (+)
60% of Democrats

Red wave..
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

YouGov/Yahoo: Midterms

Definitely will vote:
73% of Republicans (+)
60% of Democrats

Red wave..
But the Democrats will mail it in three times, so the real polling data is:

73% Republicans
180% Democrats

Blue Waaaaaavvvvvvveeee.

4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chester county PA agrees to have manned and 24 hour surveillance on all drop boxes. All suspected 3rd party(mule) ballots will be set aside for review and possible prosecution..
Ursus Americanus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:



How is this possible? We were so strong and now we are losing! Send money quick!! - Dems
Turns out unfettered infanticide on demand doesn't get out the vote once passions have cooled.

It's almost as if maybe abortion isn't the obsession of American women that the far left thinks it is.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We were told questioning the media is A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY!

Where's the outrage about Mrs. Fetterman calling for a journalist to be punished for being a journalist?
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap said:




Still can play the Covid crazy card to get a lot more "votes."
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:


With 6.2% undecided and likely to break 3-1 against the incumbent....... may have to up the GOP gain prediction by a seat.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I listened to a Real Clear Politics pollster interviewed yesterday. Comparing polls to results during the past three cycles, he called out:
1. Pennsylvania tends to be +9 Republican vs. polls
2. Nevada tends to be +0.8 Democrat vs. polls

Still will wait until election day, but I think a lot of these toss up races will end up GOP. The polls are pretty clear the key issues of concerns are the issues the Democrats have single handedly fumbled while the Culture War the regime media keeps stoking is less important. African Americans and Hispanics continue to move to the GOP - they care more about filling up their gas tanks and feeding their families than rich, privileged Karen's obsession with killing babies. Not to mention most non-whites are culturally conservative ... you do not see many African Americans, Hispanics, Asians, or Indians demanding their kids get groomed or taking their kids to strip shows.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

4th and Inches said:


With 6.2% undecided and likely to break 3-1 against the incumbent....... may have to up the GOP gain prediction by a seat.

Hope this is right. Where does the 3-1 undecideds breaking against the incumbent come from? Is it well established, your guess, or something specific to that race.
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

4th and Inches said:


With 6.2% undecided and likely to break 3-1 against the incumbent....... may have to up the GOP gain prediction by a seat.

Hope this is right. Where does the 3-1 undecideds breaking against the incumbent come from? Is it well established, your guess, or something specific to that race.

James Carville: "The incumbent gets his final number."

An incumbent at 42% with 20pts undecided (see link below) is a dead man walking. Those undecideds know who he is. Many of them voted for him last election. He is going to LOSE the undecided vote, by a good margin. His only hope is to try to get them not to vote at all. You do that by going hard negative. Independent voters in particular hate negative campaigning and are easier to drive into the "did not vote" category. It's the partisans that get fired up by a bloody/nasty fight.



Now, one can ask reasonable questions about the universe of the foregoing poll. Posted more for illustration.

Basically, any incumbent below 50 could lose. An incumbent that falls below 48 should lose. An incumbent below 46 is on death watch. The bigger the undecided pool is, the worse his situation. Because an unpopular incumbent (meaning polling below 50) cannot count on independents to win. Has to turn the race into a base election. And Dems are lagging in enthusiasm.

It's been shaping up like this all along.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oso:

Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?

The records also show that Chen made a number of donations to the Democratic National Committee, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., and Democrat Florida U.S. Senate Candidate Val Demings.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti said:


The records also show that Chen made a number of donations to the Democratic National Committee, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., and Democrat Florida U.S. Senate Candidate Val Demings.


The issue is he's a racist loser whose never worked a day in his life ... a perfect progressive.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From the Deputy Opinion Editor at USA Today: 7 key indicators all trending red

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/democrats-are-failing-across-the-board-all-signs-point-to-a-red-wave-on-election-day/ar-AA13aNQb?cvid=9849d9f6624844e5b6eb6d1458693be8
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.