U.S Senate races

49,746 Views | 1187 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Osodecentx
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sombear, Appreciate the update..
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What were Trafalgar numbers in September for PA?
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

GOP is cutting ads in Penn, Az & Wisconsin. That would mean 2 pick ups for Dems. I'm not seeing 3 Republican pick ups in states left in play.

In a highly unusual move, the National Republican Senatorial Committee this week canceled bookings worth about $10 million, including in the critical states of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Arizona.

"The fact that they canceled these reservations was a huge problem you can't get them back," said one Senate Republican strategist, who like others spokes on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal matters. "You can't win elections if you don't have money to run ads."
Gonna be ballot monkey business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, New York, Nevada, Arizona, and Wisconsin. You can bank on it. Worked perfectly in 2020. I will be shocked if any Republicans win any of the highly contested races in these states. The Dems have it figured out and know that nobody will stop them.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
sombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

What were Trafalgar numbers in September for PA?
He had Fetterman +2 but down from +5 in August.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sombear said:

Osodecentx said:

What were Trafalgar numbers in September for PA?
He had Fetterman +2 but down from +5 in August.


Thanks
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Matches Emerson College recent poll.

Emerson College was the most accurate Nevada pollster in 2020 (Biden +2 poll vs Biden +2.7 result)
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For Oso

4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They only have to be close at the finish line. Before that, they can spin spin spin….

" The big picture: Just a few weeks ago, Republicans seemed to be on the ropes thanks to a slate of polarizing, MAGA-aligned candidates with seemingly strong Democratic opponents, and a relentless Democratic focus on abortion.

Now, though, all of those fortunes seem to have been reversed."


https://www.axios.com/2022/11/02/midterm-elections-2022-crime-hispanics-abortion?twclid=258cwkrrqe1vgw7xo439kn6u4z&utm_source=twitter-pd&utm_medium=social-pd&utm_campaign=traffic-social-pd-twitter-midterms&utm_content=tide-turning
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Emmitt Till was killed 67 years ago by the Ku Klux Klan

This looks like Stephen A Smith giving a political speech.

4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Emmitt Till was killed 67 years ago by the Ku Klux Klan

This is what the Dems have for political fodder.


yeah.. nobody cares what you are yappin about lady.. FL gonna re elect Rubio and Desantis with ease
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In the left's mind, we have to be in 2022 for all social issues but we are still in 1955 for all racial issues.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anyone voting for vegetable Fetterman in Pennsylvania should lose their voting privileges. Jeeeeeeezzzzzz!!!!!

We have quickly become a country of village idiots!
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Anyone voting for vegetable Fetterman in Pennsylvania should lose their voting privileges. Jeeeeeeezzzzzz!!!!!

We have quickly become a country of village idiots!
they are brain washed. The are voting for a letter. They are driven by feelings. It is a childish way to choose an elected official yet here we are..
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Warnock with a hard cap at 45-46 across multiple polling units.

He will get less than a quarter of the undecided. His only hope is that they do not vote, as those who do will vote overwhelmingly Red.

This is a well-established dynamic.....an incumbent polling at or below 46 has a nearly impossible pathway to victory.


4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Warnock with a hard cap at 45-46 across multiple polling units.

He will get less than a quarter of the undecided. His only hope is that they do not vote, as those who do will vote overwhelmingly Red.

This is a well-established dynamic.....an incumbent polling at or below 46 has a nearly impossible pathway to victory.



the problem isnt walker beating warnock at this point, its walker hitting 50% to avoid the runoff.

I dont like the idea of giving them a second bite at the apple
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That is a concern.

Good news is, I suspect that the outcome of a GA runoff will not matter with respect to control of the senate. If so, Dems will struggle to generate the energy needed to prevail in a runoff.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FL turnout data.

4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

FL turnout data.


Heard that Miami Dade is turning red
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just watched an interview of Cahaly (Trafalgar) and Towery (insider Adv.) where among many items the discussed GA. Towery noted that to win GA, Dems need minimum of 33% turnout of black voters. Right now in the early vote (when majority of Dem's vote….) black turnout is 30%. Ergo why we see Obama campaigning in GA. Dems desperately trying to gin up turnout. But compounding their problems -polling shows Dems are only getting 70-something % of black support. That 33% turnout requirement is predicated in Dems getting +90% of the black vote. So that pushes required turnout numbers into unsustainable territory.

Walker has a reasonable chance of hitting 50%. undecideds are breaking 60-70% for GOP on polls. Some of them will decide they can't vote for either candidate and just not vote. That means those who actually do show up to vote will break even higher for the GOP….70-80%….to vote against the incumbent.

That is a well proven dynamic. An incumbent in a 46-46 race will not easily persuade many of the undecideds to vote for him. They've seen him and they don't like him. They're merely trying to decide if they can justify voting for the alternative. So the incumbent has to make the alternative look even worse, with thermonuclear negative campaign ads. The best that can the incumbent can hope for is that the 8% undecided all stay home (or vote 3rd party) and then work his turnout models better than the challenger….because 70-80% of the undecideds who do show up will vote for the challenger.

That dynamic is accentuated when the macro-environment is hostile to his party. And this cycle is all that & then some.


Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Either Trump lost fairly in 2020…..or Dems will retain control of the Senate in 2024 .

Silly to think Dems would magically discover election ethics in two short years .

Penn
New York
Michigan

Will remain solidly in Dem hands .
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

Either Trump lost fairly in 2020…..or Dems will retain control of the Senate in 2024 .

Silly to think Dems would magically discover election ethics in two short years .

Penn
New York
Michigan

Will remain solidly in Dem hands .


Everytime I start to hope you stamp it all out and bring me back to reality.

I am hoping for a 2016 surge so big their ballot harvesting wont be enough...
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

Either Trump lost fairly in 2020…..or Dems will retain control of the Senate in 2024 .

Silly to think Dems would magically discover election ethics in two short years .

Penn
New York
Michigan

Will remain solidly in Dem hands .
Democrats Worried Republicans May Take Lead Beyond Margin Of Cheating
U.S. As Republicans continue to expand their leads in polling across the country, Democrats are worried that the leads may soon grow beyond the normal margin of Democrat cheating.
"Yeah, normally our big-city vote harvesting machines and slimy election procedures are good for a bump of a few percentage points, but Republican poll numbers may have even grown beyond that," said a visibly nervous DNC Chair Jaime Harrison, (they/them). "I don't understand why people care more about feeding their kids than they do about voting in literal mega-MAGA, far-right, Nazi, alt-right, white supremacist, Nazi, fascist-adjacent Nazis. It could be the end of democracy!"
DNC operatives are hoping to close the gap by promising free abortions and gender-affirming care, as well as by sending tons of unsolicited emails to millions of voters begging for more money to save Nancy Pelosi's job.
Democrats warn that if Republicans gain control of Congress, it will be the end of democracy until the next election in 2024.
At publishing time, Republicans had gone up another 7 points nationally.

Babylon Bee
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

Either Trump lost fairly in 2020…..or Dems will retain control of the Senate in 2024 .

Silly to think Dems would magically discover election ethics in two short years .

Penn
New York
Michigan

Will remain solidly in Dem hands .
apples to oranges..

They gonna try. Several pollsters put 2% in specifically to counter possible fraud in those areas.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Does anyone think that Hershel Walker is remotely qualified to be a Senator? Not a question relative to parties. Just curious.
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Does anyone think that Hershel Walker is remotely qualified to be a Senator? Not a question relative to parties. Just curious.
As qualified as his opponent. And "other" isn't a choice.

It is Walker [likely unqualified but will vote R] or Warnock [likely unqualified and will vote D].
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Does anyone think that Hershel Walker is remotely qualified to be a Senator? Not a question relative to parties. Just curious.


No he's not .

But the alternative is even worse .
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

That is a concern.

Good news is, I suspect that the outcome of a GA runoff will not matter with respect to control of the senate. If so, Dems will struggle to generate the energy needed to prevail in a runoff.
It is guaranteed to end up in a runoff and your scenario is the hope. "It won't matter". If it is the deciding seat for a majority, look out.
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Does anyone think that Hershel Walker is remotely qualified to be a Senator? Not a question relative to parties. Just curious.
Terrible candidate. It's literally a likely policy vote.
Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Does anyone think that Hershel Walker is remotely qualified to be a Senator? Not a question relative to parties. Just curious.
Not at all.

Neither is the "preacher".
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Does anyone think that Hershel Walker is remotely qualified to be a Senator? Not a question relative to parties. Just curious.
What makes you think Warnock is qualified? He is just a preacher that talks about how bad white people are rather than talking about God.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.