Recession

108,262 Views | 1479 Replies | Last: 6 hrs ago by boognish_bear
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:



When any negative government report or unfavorable statistics come out these days, it is automatically "fake news" or a conspiracy to take down the Trump Administration. Unfortunately, we gotta put up with this nonsense for three more years. It is becoming exhausting.
Call it a tax, the people are outraged! Call it a tariff, the people get out their checkbooks and wave their American flags!!!
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Slimeball

Time to boycott Sherwin Williams if you can help it
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Corporate share buybacks were made legal in the United States in 1982.The SEC adopted Rule 10b-18, which provided a safe harbor for companies.This rule allowed companies to repurchase their own shares without facing legal repercussions.Prior to 1982, buybacks were often viewed as market manipulation." (which is exactly what they are).

Fixing capitalism will involve eliminating this so the free market can accurately price a share of corporate stock. It will involve eliminating restrictions on short selling so market participants who see a downside to a particular company's strategic vision can accurately profit from it. It will involve eliminating the use of stock and stock options as a form of compensation.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

"Corporate share buybacks were made legal in the United States in 1982.The SEC adopted Rule 10b-18, which provided a safe harbor for companies.This rule allowed companies to repurchase their own shares without facing legal repercussions.Prior to 1982, buybacks were often viewed as market manipulation." (which is exactly what they are).

Fixing capitalism will involve eliminating this so the free market can accurately price a share of corporate stock. It will involve eliminating restrictions on short selling so market participants who see a downside to a particular company's strategic vision can accurately profit from it. It will involve eliminating the use of stock and stock options as a form of compensation.

One of the biggest issues is Executive compensation. It has gotten ridiculous.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:


One of the biggest issues is Executive compensation. It has gotten ridiculous.



In general, these people already pay a flat income tax by structuring their compensation as benefits and stock options. Eliminate that and force everyone to take their entire income as either W2 or 1099 pay. That's a start. There probably need to be some restrictions placed on corporate boards as well to ensure they are looking out for the company's owners (shareholders).
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Realitybites said:

"Corporate share buybacks were made legal in the United States in 1982.The SEC adopted Rule 10b-18, which provided a safe harbor for companies.This rule allowed companies to repurchase their own shares without facing legal repercussions.Prior to 1982, buybacks were often viewed as market manipulation." (which is exactly what they are).

Fixing capitalism will involve eliminating this so the free market can accurately price a share of corporate stock. It will involve eliminating restrictions on short selling so market participants who see a downside to a particular company's strategic vision can accurately profit from it. It will involve eliminating the use of stock and stock options as a form of compensation.

One of the biggest issues is Executive compensation. It has gotten ridiculous.


OK, so who gets to decide how much money someone should be "allowed" to be paid? And who decides what happens to the revenue a business pulls in?

Should Taylor Swift have a cap on how much money she gets? What about JK Rowling? What about professional athletes or bands?

Where does all this become government using powers never granted by the Constitution?
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
.. and how much arby's is too much arbys???

PA.

- UL

.... and, as always, TIA.

D!

{ sipping coffee }

{ eating donuts }

Go Bears!!

Beat Az St.!!!

BID.

arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat....
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

FLBear5630 said:

Realitybites said:

"Corporate share buybacks were made legal in the United States in 1982.The SEC adopted Rule 10b-18, which provided a safe harbor for companies.This rule allowed companies to repurchase their own shares without facing legal repercussions.Prior to 1982, buybacks were often viewed as market manipulation." (which is exactly what they are).

Fixing capitalism will involve eliminating this so the free market can accurately price a share of corporate stock. It will involve eliminating restrictions on short selling so market participants who see a downside to a particular company's strategic vision can accurately profit from it. It will involve eliminating the use of stock and stock options as a form of compensation.

One of the biggest issues is Executive compensation. It has gotten ridiculous.


OK, so who gets to decide how much money someone should be "allowed" to be paid? And who decides what happens to the revenue a business pulls in?

Should Taylor Swift have a cap on how much money she gets? What about JK Rowling? What about professional athletes or bands?

Where does all this become government using powers never granted by the Constitution?


Why do we have antitrust laws?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

FLBear5630 said:

Realitybites said:

"Corporate share buybacks were made legal in the United States in 1982.The SEC adopted Rule 10b-18, which provided a safe harbor for companies.This rule allowed companies to repurchase their own shares without facing legal repercussions.Prior to 1982, buybacks were often viewed as market manipulation." (which is exactly what they are).

Fixing capitalism will involve eliminating this so the free market can accurately price a share of corporate stock. It will involve eliminating restrictions on short selling so market participants who see a downside to a particular company's strategic vision can accurately profit from it. It will involve eliminating the use of stock and stock options as a form of compensation.

One of the biggest issues is Executive compensation. It has gotten ridiculous.


OK, so who gets to decide how much money someone should be "allowed" to be paid? And who decides what happens to the revenue a business pulls in?

Should Taylor Swift have a cap on how much money she gets? What about JK Rowling? What about professional athletes or bands?

Where does all this become government using powers never granted by the Constitution?

How about publicly traded? How about not allowing bonuses for executives when laying off people or reducing their benefits? Sherwin Williams did away with the 401K match due to weak sales, but the CEO got a 3M raise over that timeframe.

Sorry, I used to think like you. But watched too few get rewarded while they gutted their company's all in the name of lowering overhead. Profits should raise all ships - At least that is what CEO types say when you want something. But, losses don't seem to lower all ships do they?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Oldbear83 said:

FLBear5630 said:

Realitybites said:

"Corporate share buybacks were made legal in the United States in 1982.The SEC adopted Rule 10b-18, which provided a safe harbor for companies.This rule allowed companies to repurchase their own shares without facing legal repercussions.Prior to 1982, buybacks were often viewed as market manipulation." (which is exactly what they are).

Fixing capitalism will involve eliminating this so the free market can accurately price a share of corporate stock. It will involve eliminating restrictions on short selling so market participants who see a downside to a particular company's strategic vision can accurately profit from it. It will involve eliminating the use of stock and stock options as a form of compensation.

One of the biggest issues is Executive compensation. It has gotten ridiculous.


OK, so who gets to decide how much money someone should be "allowed" to be paid? And who decides what happens to the revenue a business pulls in?

Should Taylor Swift have a cap on how much money she gets? What about JK Rowling? What about professional athletes or bands?

Where does all this become government using powers never granted by the Constitution?


Why do we have antitrust laws?


You think rich CEO at a company somehow prevents another CEO from getting rich?
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All the big corporate boards have to do is keep people barely happy enough. If enough of the 99% got real upset that their wages have stagnate while CEOs post new records every quarter, they will vote to restrict the CEO's earnings. And that would be exactly within the framework of the Constitution.

Seems like a better solution is the big corporations doing the right thing, and preventing us from getting to that point.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Oldbear83 said:

FLBear5630 said:

Realitybites said:

"Corporate share buybacks were made legal in the United States in 1982.The SEC adopted Rule 10b-18, which provided a safe harbor for companies.This rule allowed companies to repurchase their own shares without facing legal repercussions.Prior to 1982, buybacks were often viewed as market manipulation." (which is exactly what they are).

Fixing capitalism will involve eliminating this so the free market can accurately price a share of corporate stock. It will involve eliminating restrictions on short selling so market participants who see a downside to a particular company's strategic vision can accurately profit from it. It will involve eliminating the use of stock and stock options as a form of compensation.

One of the biggest issues is Executive compensation. It has gotten ridiculous.


OK, so who gets to decide how much money someone should be "allowed" to be paid? And who decides what happens to the revenue a business pulls in?

Should Taylor Swift have a cap on how much money she gets? What about JK Rowling? What about professional athletes or bands?

Where does all this become government using powers never granted by the Constitution?

How about publicly traded? How about not allowing bonuses for executives when laying off people or reducing their benefits? Sherwin Williams did away with the 401K match due to weak sales, but the CEO got a 3M raise over that timeframe.

Sorry, I used to think like you. But watched too few get rewarded while they gutted their company's all in the name of lowering overhead. Profits should raise all ships - At least that is what CEO types say when you want something. But, losses don't seem to lower all ships do they?


I'm not a fan of stinking rich executives, but I distrust even more the idea that government should say how much we are allowed to make, especially since you don't have to be psychic to know salary caps would eventually be used on the middle class.

You need to think this through before letting someone play your anger into their schemes.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:





Do any of these metrics even count? Or will they be thrown in the "fake news" bin?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

boognish_bear said:





Do any of these metrics even count? Or will they be thrown in the "fake news" bin?


Quibble, those are indicators, not metrics.

That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

FLBear5630 said:

boognish_bear said:





Do any of these metrics even count? Or will they be thrown in the "fake news" bin?


Quibble, those are indicators, not metrics.



Noted. Thanks.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:





Holy *****!!! We are in trouble. You cannot fix a problem if you are unwilling to acknowledge we have a problem.
Call it a tax, the people are outraged! Call it a tariff, the people get out their checkbooks and wave their American flags!!!
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Hopefully, it is not made by foreign workers...



Only people with the right Visa's can make Hamburger Helper...


(Yes, drinking Stella and some Lalo tequila...)
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




But trillions of dollars are puring in. They have spending power of $1.38 but billions and billions. We have become Greece 2001...
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I thought we were going to have a recession and maybe we will but 2Q's 3rd estimate of GDP came in at 3.8%.

https://www.bea.gov/news/2025/gross-domestic-product-2nd-quarter-2025-third-estimate-gdp-industry-corporate-profits


Quote:

Real gross domestic product (GDP) increased at an annual rate of 3.8 percent in the second quarter of 2025 (April, May, and June), according to the third estimate released by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the first quarter, real GDP decreased 0.6 percent (revised).



RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Stop worrying about the dollar. We have $Trumpcoin, $Fartcoin, and $Bitcoin!!!
Call it a tax, the people are outraged! Call it a tariff, the people get out their checkbooks and wave their American flags!!!
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

boognish_bear said:



Stop worrying about the dollar. We have $Trumpcoin, $Fartcoin, and $Bitcoin!!!

load the bong.............

- el KKM

... yield down .....

D!

.... price up*.

* northern hemisphere only**.

** CFA level sq rt (3) - Wormhole Finance

BID.

{ sipping coffee }

arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat....
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This doesn't seem sustainable for a healthy economy

KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Didn't realize the GDP was 3.3%.

Got to give our Secretary of the Treasury a lot of credit.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:




Didn't realize the GDP was 3.3%.

Got to give our Secretary of the Treasury a lot of credit.

So, far it is working overall. Some areas are getting hit, such as farmers. But, that is not out of the ordinary as some sectors always will take a hit.

Believe me, I am rooting for Bessent. My 401k needs him to be right. The article I posted helped me out with what he is doing. Keep it going.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.