Culture and Society 2022

89,597 Views | 1592 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by cowboycwr
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There are some issues where I'm like reasonable people can disagree. This is not one of them. I honestly would like some intelligent, sane person to explain to me why minors should be allowed to receive dangerous medical care that could have severe, negative lifetime implications because of a mental illness. There was a time when intelligent adults wanted to protect children rather than feed them into the woodchipper of woke politics.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Each day I become convinced twatter may be the most insidious and damaging part of our culture. It's really enabled the least qualified and undeserved an outsized influence on policy and cultural norms.

The internet democratized data and information. That was thought to be a really good thing. Giving everyone a voice.

What it has done, with ZERO doubt, is proven that not everyone deserves a voice and that some people are just far too dumb or ignorant to use their voice…those people are also the loudest.
In theory yes, but I think as we have seen with the censorship and algorithms is does not really provide equal access.

Practically, it has given a disproportionate amount of attention to a tiny minority of people, and as you noted not necessarily those who - may deserve a voice - but may deserve to be ignored. Just riffing, but I think what it has done is really blunt to importance and efficacy of persuasion and intelligent arguments and just replaced them with slogans designed specifically for unintelligent, emotional mobs.
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Men are taller than women equals <checks notes> fascism.

Got it.
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Men are taller than women equals <checks notes> fascism.

Got it.


Universities have always sheltered the terminally stupid……the perpetually useless .

Only now US taxpayers are paying their carrying costs .
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti said:




March of the pervert rapist molesters
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti said:




Seems kinda plain to me. Could use more color
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

nein51 said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Each day I become convinced twatter may be the most insidious and damaging part of our culture. It's really enabled the least qualified and undeserved an outsized influence on policy and cultural norms.

The internet democratized data and information. That was thought to be a really good thing. Giving everyone a voice.

What it has done, with ZERO doubt, is proven that not everyone deserves a voice and that some people are just far too dumb or ignorant to use their voice…those people are also the loudest.
In theory yes, but I think as we have seen with the censorship and algorithms is does not really provide equal access.

Practically, it has given a disproportionate amount of attention to a tiny minority of people, and as you noted not necessarily those who - may deserve a voice - but may deserve to be ignored. Just riffing, but I think what it has done is really blunt to importance and efficacy of persuasion and intelligent arguments and just replaced them with slogans designed specifically for unintelligent, emotional mobs.

When your argument has to be boiled down to 40 characters (it's more now) then you're going to lose nuance. Coupled with the fact that probably 50% of users are spam bots you have an issue for sure. The vast majority of tweets are produced by a very, very small number of accounts. Twitter isn't real life…but politicians have seen the need to govern like it's a majority.

Social media will be the downfall of modern society. I have no doubt about that.
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

nein51 said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Each day I become convinced twatter may be the most insidious and damaging part of our culture. It's really enabled the least qualified and undeserved an outsized influence on policy and cultural norms.

The internet democratized data and information. That was thought to be a really good thing. Giving everyone a voice.

What it has done, with ZERO doubt, is proven that not everyone deserves a voice and that some people are just far too dumb or ignorant to use their voice…those people are also the loudest.
In theory yes, but I think as we have seen with the censorship and algorithms is does not really provide equal access.

Practically, it has given a disproportionate amount of attention to a tiny minority of people, and as you noted not necessarily those who - may deserve a voice - but may deserve to be ignored. Just riffing, but I think what it has done is really blunt to importance and efficacy of persuasion and intelligent arguments and just replaced them with slogans designed specifically for unintelligent, emotional mobs.

When your argument has to be boiled down to 40 characters (it's more now) then you're going to lose nuance. Coupled with the fact that probably 50% of users are spam bots you have an issue for sure. The vast majority of tweets are produced by a very, very small number of accounts. Twitter isn't real life…but politicians have seen the need to govern like it's a majority.

Social media will be the downfall of modern society. I have no doubt about that.
Agreed. The limited characters is harmful. Plus, the inherent traits of the technology means that the moronic masses do not have to think for themselves but simple copy the stupidity of one particular poster, and the Russian and Chinese bots just copy the idiocracy.

I realize this White House is made up of morons, but I am shocked even affirmative action token hires are so stupid as to believe twatter reflects reality.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just remember....LOVE WINS!!!

https://instagr.am/p/CkIlOnpOr09
riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ah, the wonderful benefits of feminism

whitetrash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

ah, the wonderful benefits of feminism


Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thank goodness!

Sam Smith and Kim Petras make history as first non-binary and transgender artists to reach No. 1
whitetrash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Thank goodness!

Sam Smith and Kim Petras make history as first non-binary and transgender artists to reach No. 1
I'm gonna guess neither one of them did a remake of either Bo Diddley or Helen Reddy.



Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Thank goodness!

Sam Smith and Kim Petras make history as first non-binary and transgender artists to reach No. 1
I genuinely do not actually know what "non-binary" and "transgender" actually mean.

Are they cross-dressers?
Have than had gender-reassignment surgery?
Are they just LARPing the opposite sex?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Taylor Swift Removes 'Fat' From Apple Music Video After Outcry

When you are triggered by this.....just give up.

Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti said:


Lithium mining. The colors are interesting, so I guess there is some beauty in the destructive electric battery future. These people are wacko!

Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
P-rnographic books in school libraries=Free Speech!!!!

Private companies publishing book to free market=Fascism!!!!


Angry literary figures demand Amy Coney Barrett book be shut down in open letter to publisher


Quote:

Over 500 literary figures have signed an open letter demanding Penguin Random House shut down a book deal with Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett valued at $2 million over her vote to overturn Roe v. Wade.

In the letter, the progressive signers claimed that while they "care deeply about freedom of speech," they also believe it is important for publishers to uphold their own dedication to the first amendment with a "duty of care."

"We recognize that harm is done to a democracy not only in the form of censorship, but also in the form of assault on inalienable human rights," the letter states. "As such, we are calling on Penguin Random House to recognize its own history and corporate responsibility commitments by reevaluating its decision to move forward with publishing Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett's forthcoming book."
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

P-rnographic books in school libraries=Free Speech!!!!

Private companies publishing book to free market=Fascism!!!!


Angry literary figures demand Amy Coney Barrett book be shut down in open letter to publisher


Quote:

Over 500 literary figures have signed an open letter demanding Penguin Random House shut down a book deal with Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett valued at $2 million over her vote to overturn Roe v. Wade.

In the letter, the progressive signers claimed that while they "care deeply about freedom of speech," they also believe it is important for publishers to uphold their own dedication to the first amendment with a "duty of care."

"We recognize that harm is done to a democracy not only in the form of censorship, but also in the form of assault on inalienable human rights," the letter states. "As such, we are calling on Penguin Random House to recognize its own history and corporate responsibility commitments by reevaluating its decision to move forward with publishing Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett's forthcoming book."

It's the typical Orwellian power - free speech = speech I like.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This didn't happen

OR

you are a terrible parent for bringing your young child into geopolitics that he should not be worried about.

Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some girls are taller than boys. Well that sure destroyed the gender binary narrative.

nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you want to be truly grossed out the latest term they are using for ***** is "princess wand". Yeah. That's right.
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Some girls are taller than boys. Well that sure destroyed the gender binary narrative.


This reply in the comments. LOL!

Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:


Got to increase the intensity of her rhetoric if she wants to remain a social media darling .

Same applies for AOC.
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:


those of us who have been paying attention have known that she was just a tool of the globablists all along.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

Doc Holliday said:


Got to increase the intensity of her rhetoric if she wants to remain a social media darling .

Same applies for AOC.
AOC has taken a huge hit to her image recently.

This tweet is an example of how her constituents now view her and the socialist squad in the dem party:


I've been telling progressive types for years that the people they're voting for are sheep's in wolves clothing, but it doesn't phase them. The socialist rhetoric is good enough for them.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AOC is merely cosplaying a Congressman. Not that she has a lot of bricks in her attic, but she just parrots whatever the loonies on twatter and TikTok think is the latest wokey cause. Ukraine is the 2022 Covid mask.
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Canada2017 said:

Doc Holliday said:


Got to increase the intensity of her rhetoric if she wants to remain a social media darling .

Same applies for AOC.
AOC has taken a huge hit to her image recently.

This tweet is an example of how her constituents now view her and the socialist squad in the dem party:


I've been telling progressive types for years that the people they're voting for are sheep's in wolves clothing, but it doesn't phase them. The socialist rhetoric is good enough for them.


AOC will remain the congresswoman for that district as long as she wants the job .

However bigger bucks await her in other venues .

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.