Joe Rogan is what he is. We in the media might want to spend more time thinking about why so many people trust him instead of us.
— Matthew Rosenberg (@AllMattNYT) January 30, 2022
Joe Rogan is what he is. We in the media might want to spend more time thinking about why so many people trust him instead of us.
— Matthew Rosenberg (@AllMattNYT) January 30, 2022
Guzman was fired because her actions didnt match the values of the company she worked for.. the company has that right. She wasnt canceledSam Lowry said:
Rogan was boycotted. Guzman was canceled. Important distinction.
There are certain people, in effect, who become uncancelable. Dave Chappelle, Joe Rogan, Howard Stern, before he became a total pussy, their audience is big enough they will be fine no matter where they are. Their fans are effectively able to cancel cancel culture.
— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) January 31, 2022
His point about how alleged misinformation was suppressed and, with time, emerged as the truth (or at least as entirely reasonable) is utterly unanswerable and should create a profound sense of modesty among the cancellers, if they are capable of regret or reflection https://t.co/nO8hqbWcb6
— Rich Lowry (@RichLowry) January 31, 2022
Rights aren't the issue. Cancelers typically are acting within their rights.4th and Inches said:Guzman was fired because her actions didnt match the values of the company she worked for.. the company has that right. She wasnt canceledSam Lowry said:
Rogan was boycotted. Guzman was canceled. Important distinction.
The objective behind canceling is to deny that attention, so that the person loses cultural cachet. She didnt have much of that to start with and still has the same outlet and can continue to voice her opinions. Not canceled, just fired
thats what you got? Cool i guess..Sam Lowry said:Rights aren't the issue. Cancelers typically are acting within their rights.4th and Inches said:Guzman was fired because her actions didnt match the values of the company she worked for.. the company has that right. She wasnt canceledSam Lowry said:
Rogan was boycotted. Guzman was canceled. Important distinction.
The objective behind canceling is to deny that attention, so that the person loses cultural cachet. She didnt have much of that to start with and still has the same outlet and can continue to voice her opinions. Not canceled, just fired
Quote:
Disney has chosen a Latina to portray Snow White in their upcoming live-action film. Rachel Zegler, known for her debut role as Maria in 20th Century Studios and Steven Spielberg-directed West Side Story, will bring fantasy to our screen with her confirmed participation as the iconic princess.
"Rachel's extraordinary vocal abilities are just the beginning of her gifts. Her strength, intelligence, and optimism will become an integral part of rediscovering the joy in this classic Disney fairytale," movie director Marc Webb said in a statement.
homegirl we have LOTS to catch up on pic.twitter.com/gtNsrpITm0
— rachel zegler (she/her/hers) (@rachelzegler) June 22, 2021
It's journalists who are trying to get people fired from their jobs and universities and it's journalism professors trafficking in censorship. There's your answer @AllMattNYT https://t.co/UBjw9814Id
— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) January 31, 2022
New York Times: We are very, very afraid of Republican backlash in the midterms.
— Caitlin Flanagan (@CaitlinPacific) January 29, 2022
Also New York Times: Our new word for women and girls is “menstruater”
My latest: An original investigation into a California school's ethnic studies curriculum. Yes, I found CRT, being taught, in the school. But beyond that, the students hated (and were failing) the class.
— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) January 31, 2022
They were all Hispanic.https://t.co/BhqPBJFFSm
Cobretti said:New York Times: We are very, very afraid of Republican backlash in the midterms.
— Caitlin Flanagan (@CaitlinPacific) January 29, 2022
Also New York Times: Our new word for women and girls is “menstruater”
Well, lookie here… https://t.co/oeLVWMa6OY
— Joe Rogan (@joerogan) February 1, 2022
debunked!Cobretti said:Well, lookie here… https://t.co/oeLVWMa6OY
— Joe Rogan (@joerogan) February 1, 2022
Duke University has been doing a study on Ivermectin as well. Should have results next month or in March.Cobretti said:Well, lookie here… https://t.co/oeLVWMa6OY
— Joe Rogan (@joerogan) February 1, 2022
Looks promising.Reuters said:
(Corrects headline and first paragraph to remove reference to the drug being effective in treating against Omicron in Phase III clinical trials)
CORRECTED-Japan's Kowa says ivermectin showed 'antiviral effect' against Omicron in researchSam Lowry said:Looks promising.Reuters said:
(Corrects headline and first paragraph to remove reference to the drug being effective in treating against Omicron in Phase III clinical trials)
It certainly does not.4th and Inches said:CORRECTED-Japan's Kowa says ivermectin showed 'antiviral effect' against Omicron in researchSam Lowry said:Looks promising.Reuters said:
(Corrects headline and first paragraph to remove reference to the drug being effective in treating against Omicron in Phase III clinical trials)
Seems to say the same thing only differently..
"Antiviral effect" means "effective in treating"
you are right.. having the effect of an antiviral(makes people better/lessens symptoms) clearly doesnt mean effective treatmentSam Lowry said:It certainly does not.4th and Inches said:CORRECTED-Japan's Kowa says ivermectin showed 'antiviral effect' against Omicron in researchSam Lowry said:Looks promising.Reuters said:
(Corrects headline and first paragraph to remove reference to the drug being effective in treating against Omicron in Phase III clinical trials)
Seems to say the same thing only differently..
"Antiviral effect" means "effective in treating"
you lose.. you cited wikipedia for crying out loud.. you cant even cite wikipedia for a 4th grade english paper.Sam Lowry said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vitro
The aughties just called...they want their wikiphobia back.4th and Inches said:you lose.. you cited wikipedia for crying out loud.. you cant even cite wikipedia for a 4th grade english paper.Sam Lowry said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vitro
aww u use it in court homie?Sam Lowry said:The aughties just called...they want their wikiphobia back.4th and Inches said:you lose.. you cited wikipedia for crying out loud.. you cant even cite wikipedia for a 4th grade english paper.Sam Lowry said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vitro
It's background information. Learn the difference between test tubes and human subjects and get back to me.4th and Inches said:aww u use it in court homie?Sam Lowry said:The aughties just called...they want their wikiphobia back.4th and Inches said:you lose.. you cited wikipedia for crying out loud.. you cant even cite wikipedia for a 4th grade english paper.Sam Lowry said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vitro
plenty of humans taken the drug that must not be named and got the same anti viral effect..Sam Lowry said:It's background information. Learn the difference between test tubes and human subjects and get back to me.4th and Inches said:aww u use it in court homie?Sam Lowry said:The aughties just called...they want their wikiphobia back.4th and Inches said:you lose.. you cited wikipedia for crying out loud.. you cant even cite wikipedia for a 4th grade english paper.Sam Lowry said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vitro
Not according to the clinical trials. So stick to...whatever involves anecdotes and not science.4th and Inches said:plenty of humans taken the drug that must not be named and got the same anti viral effect..Sam Lowry said:It's background information. Learn the difference between test tubes and human subjects and get back to me.4th and Inches said:aww u use it in court homie?Sam Lowry said:The aughties just called...they want their wikiphobia back.4th and Inches said:you lose.. you cited wikipedia for crying out loud.. you cant even cite wikipedia for a 4th grade english paper.Sam Lowry said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vitro
Stick to the law chief..
In a series of recent interviews, the 61-year-old, two-time Academy Award-winner criticized American culture, saying men are being feminized by it, "surrendering their jeans and putting on a skirt."https://t.co/Y331Nj8RK1
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) January 31, 2022
ah.. scienceSam Lowry said:Not according to the clinical trials. So stick to...whatever involves anecdotes and not science.4th and Inches said:plenty of humans taken the drug that must not be named and got the same anti viral effect..Sam Lowry said:It's background information. Learn the difference between test tubes and human subjects and get back to me.4th and Inches said:aww u use it in court homie?Sam Lowry said:The aughties just called...they want their wikiphobia back.4th and Inches said:you lose.. you cited wikipedia for crying out loud.. you cant even cite wikipedia for a 4th grade english paper.Sam Lowry said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vitro
Stick to the law chief..
Another meta-analysis relying on the fraudulent Egyptian study.4th and Inches said:ah.. scienceSam Lowry said:Not according to the clinical trials. So stick to...whatever involves anecdotes and not science.4th and Inches said:plenty of humans taken the drug that must not be named and got the same anti viral effect..Sam Lowry said:It's background information. Learn the difference between test tubes and human subjects and get back to me.4th and Inches said:aww u use it in court homie?Sam Lowry said:The aughties just called...they want their wikiphobia back.4th and Inches said:you lose.. you cited wikipedia for crying out loud.. you cant even cite wikipedia for a 4th grade english paper.Sam Lowry said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vitro
Stick to the law chief..
Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248252/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34418758/Sam Lowry said:Another meta-analysis relying on the fraudulent Egyptian study.4th and Inches said:ah.. scienceSam Lowry said:Not according to the clinical trials. So stick to...whatever involves anecdotes and not science.4th and Inches said:plenty of humans taken the drug that must not be named and got the same anti viral effect..Sam Lowry said:It's background information. Learn the difference between test tubes and human subjects and get back to me.4th and Inches said:aww u use it in court homie?Sam Lowry said:The aughties just called...they want their wikiphobia back.4th and Inches said:you lose.. you cited wikipedia for crying out loud.. you cant even cite wikipedia for a 4th grade english paper.Sam Lowry said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vitro
Stick to the law chief..
Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248252/
Headline: "CORRECTED-Japan's Kowa says ivermectin showed 'antiviral effect' against Omicron in research"Sam Lowry said:Looks promising.Reuters said:
(Corrects headline and first paragraph to remove reference to the drug being effective in treating against Omicron in Phase III clinical trials)
More of the same.4th and Inches said:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34418758/Sam Lowry said:Another meta-analysis relying on the fraudulent Egyptian study.4th and Inches said:ah.. scienceSam Lowry said:Not according to the clinical trials. So stick to...whatever involves anecdotes and not science.4th and Inches said:plenty of humans taken the drug that must not be named and got the same anti viral effect..Sam Lowry said:It's background information. Learn the difference between test tubes and human subjects and get back to me.4th and Inches said:aww u use it in court homie?Sam Lowry said:The aughties just called...they want their wikiphobia back.4th and Inches said:you lose.. you cited wikipedia for crying out loud.. you cant even cite wikipedia for a 4th grade english paper.Sam Lowry said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vitro
Stick to the law chief..
Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248252/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34573986/ 21% of patients got better faster on ivermectin vs placebo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vitroHarrison Bergeron said:Headline: "CORRECTED-Japan's Kowa says ivermectin showed 'antiviral effect' against Omicron in research"Sam Lowry said:Looks promising.Reuters said:
(Corrects headline and first paragraph to remove reference to the drug being effective in treating against Omicron in Phase III clinical trials)
Quick questions:
1. What do you think "anti-viral" means?
2. Do you think SARS-CoV-2 is a virus?
Who knows what the day will show but your reflexiveness leads to you posting discredited studies about masks, etc.