Sam Lowry said:You can find a list of weapons charges here. Let us know how many were for using fists as a weapon.whiterock said:part in bold is serving a lie. And you know it.Osodecentx said:The rioters were actually armed. Some had guns4th said:
If they are armed, as their leader well knowsdeep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Quote:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.Quote:This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.Quote:Quote:
Walking outside in Texas, more than 75% chance you are standing near a person who is armed. It is legal in Texas, not so in DC
Just because People carry weapons doesnt mean they are going to shoot you. I agree
Maybe they were worried about their personal safety because they had seen the clashes with Antifa. Maybe, but it is illegal in DC
There were plenty of those that broke out in DC during that 2 day period of the 5th and 6th If you say so
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
There is nothing remarkable about a protestor holding something that could be used as a weapon. A fist can be used as a weapon, fer crissakes. How many have been charged with crimes involving weapons? How many have been charge with carrying a firearm into the capitol?
If we are to follow your logic, then any protest is an insurrection. Any riot is an insurrection. Any gathering where someone holds a fraternity paddle is an insurrection.
You are being very, very silly.
You've retreated into absurdity because absurdity is all you have left.
did the 2 with firearms charges also get illegal entry charges?RMF5630 said:Sam Lowry said:You can find a list of weapons charges here. Let us know how many were for using fists as a weapon.whiterock said:part in bold is serving a lie. And you know it.Osodecentx said:The rioters were actually armed. Some had guns4th said:
If they are armed, as their leader well knowsdeep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Quote:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.Quote:This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.Quote:Quote:
Walking outside in Texas, more than 75% chance you are standing near a person who is armed. It is legal in Texas, not so in DC
Just because People carry weapons doesnt mean they are going to shoot you. I agree
Maybe they were worried about their personal safety because they had seen the clashes with Antifa. Maybe, but it is illegal in DC
There were plenty of those that broke out in DC during that 2 day period of the 5th and 6th If you say so
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
There is nothing remarkable about a protestor holding something that could be used as a weapon. A fist can be used as a weapon, fer crissakes. How many have been charged with crimes involving weapons? How many have been charge with carrying a firearm into the capitol?
If we are to follow your logic, then any protest is an insurrection. Any riot is an insurrection. Any gathering where someone holds a fraternity paddle is an insurrection.
You are being very, very silly.
You've retreated into absurdity because absurdity is all you have left.
A search of firearm turned up 2. There were 2 firearm charges. There were 10 pages of non-firearm weapons charges.
So they were going to overthrow the US Govt with 2 pistols and 50 knives & clubs???
I agree with you arrest them. Anyone with a weapon or that went into Congresspr was violent needs to be arrested and stiff penalties, no arguement. 41 months for Shaman, I am good. He broke in.
I just don't see insurrection or coup. Or it being led by inside US Govt. Sorry.
Jacques Strap said:"January 6th was good actually." - @PressSec, iterating @POTUS's official stance on protests https://t.co/kvC2X3zQEa
— Eric Spencer (@JustEric) July 8, 2022
4th and Inches said:did the 2 with firearms charges also get illegal entry charges?RMF5630 said:Sam Lowry said:You can find a list of weapons charges here. Let us know how many were for using fists as a weapon.whiterock said:part in bold is serving a lie. And you know it.Osodecentx said:The rioters were actually armed. Some had guns4th said:
If they are armed, as their leader well knowsdeep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Quote:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.Quote:This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.Quote:Quote:
Walking outside in Texas, more than 75% chance you are standing near a person who is armed. It is legal in Texas, not so in DC
Just because People carry weapons doesnt mean they are going to shoot you. I agree
Maybe they were worried about their personal safety because they had seen the clashes with Antifa. Maybe, but it is illegal in DC
There were plenty of those that broke out in DC during that 2 day period of the 5th and 6th If you say so
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
There is nothing remarkable about a protestor holding something that could be used as a weapon. A fist can be used as a weapon, fer crissakes. How many have been charged with crimes involving weapons? How many have been charge with carrying a firearm into the capitol?
If we are to follow your logic, then any protest is an insurrection. Any riot is an insurrection. Any gathering where someone holds a fraternity paddle is an insurrection.
You are being very, very silly.
You've retreated into absurdity because absurdity is all you have left.
A search of firearm turned up 2. There were 2 firearm charges. There were 10 pages of non-firearm weapons charges.
So they were going to overthrow the US Govt with 2 pistols and 50 knives & clubs???
I agree with you arrest them. Anyone with a weapon or that went into Congresspr was violent needs to be arrested and stiff penalties, no arguement. 41 months for Shaman, I am good. He broke in.
I just don't see insurrection or coup. Or it being led by inside US Govt. Sorry.
some times you have to use logic and avoid emotion.. you will get there one day..Osodecentx said:4th and Inches said:did the 2 with firearms charges also get illegal entry charges?RMF5630 said:Sam Lowry said:You can find a list of weapons charges here. Let us know how many were for using fists as a weapon.whiterock said:part in bold is serving a lie. And you know it.Osodecentx said:The rioters were actually armed. Some had guns4th said:
If they are armed, as their leader well knowsdeep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Quote:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.Quote:This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.Quote:Quote:
Walking outside in Texas, more than 75% chance you are standing near a person who is armed. It is legal in Texas, not so in DC
Just because People carry weapons doesnt mean they are going to shoot you. I agree
Maybe they were worried about their personal safety because they had seen the clashes with Antifa. Maybe, but it is illegal in DC
There were plenty of those that broke out in DC during that 2 day period of the 5th and 6th If you say so
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
There is nothing remarkable about a protestor holding something that could be used as a weapon. A fist can be used as a weapon, fer crissakes. How many have been charged with crimes involving weapons? How many have been charge with carrying a firearm into the capitol?
If we are to follow your logic, then any protest is an insurrection. Any riot is an insurrection. Any gathering where someone holds a fraternity paddle is an insurrection.
You are being very, very silly.
You've retreated into absurdity because absurdity is all you have left.
A search of firearm turned up 2. There were 2 firearm charges. There were 10 pages of non-firearm weapons charges.
So they were going to overthrow the US Govt with 2 pistols and 50 knives & clubs???
I agree with you arrest them. Anyone with a weapon or that went into Congresspr was violent needs to be arrested and stiff penalties, no arguement. 41 months for Shaman, I am good. He broke in.
I just don't see insurrection or coup. Or it being led by inside US Govt. Sorry.
4th and Inches said:some times you have to use logic and avoid emotion.. you will get there one day..Osodecentx said:4th and Inches said:did the 2 with firearms charges also get illegal entry charges?RMF5630 said:Sam Lowry said:You can find a list of weapons charges here. Let us know how many were for using fists as a weapon.whiterock said:part in bold is serving a lie. And you know it.Osodecentx said:The rioters were actually armed. Some had guns4th said:
If they are armed, as their leader well knowsdeep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Quote:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.Quote:This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.Quote:Quote:
Walking outside in Texas, more than 75% chance you are standing near a person who is armed. It is legal in Texas, not so in DC
Just because People carry weapons doesnt mean they are going to shoot you. I agree
Maybe they were worried about their personal safety because they had seen the clashes with Antifa. Maybe, but it is illegal in DC
There were plenty of those that broke out in DC during that 2 day period of the 5th and 6th If you say so
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
There is nothing remarkable about a protestor holding something that could be used as a weapon. A fist can be used as a weapon, fer crissakes. How many have been charged with crimes involving weapons? How many have been charge with carrying a firearm into the capitol?
If we are to follow your logic, then any protest is an insurrection. Any riot is an insurrection. Any gathering where someone holds a fraternity paddle is an insurrection.
You are being very, very silly.
You've retreated into absurdity because absurdity is all you have left.
A search of firearm turned up 2. There were 2 firearm charges. There were 10 pages of non-firearm weapons charges.
So they were going to overthrow the US Govt with 2 pistols and 50 knives & clubs???
I agree with you arrest them. Anyone with a weapon or that went into Congresspr was violent needs to be arrested and stiff penalties, no arguement. 41 months for Shaman, I am good. He broke in.
I just don't see insurrection or coup. Or it being led by inside US Govt. Sorry.
Sam Lowry said:You can find a list of weapons charges here. Let us know how many were for using fists as a weapon.Quote:part in bold is serving a lie. And you know it.Quote:The rioters were actually armed. Some had gunsQuote:deep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Quote:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.Quote:
This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
There is nothing remarkable about a protestor holding something that could be used as a weapon. A fist can be used as a weapon, fer crissakes. How many have been charged with crimes involving weapons? How many have been charge with carrying a firearm into the capitol?
If we are to follow your logic, then any protest is an insurrection. Any riot is an insurrection. Any gathering where someone holds a fraternity paddle is an insurrection.
You are being very, very silly.
You've retreated into absurdity because absurdity is all you have left.
I don't know. Did it on my phone at a gas station filling up. Sort of limited on the analytics....4th and Inches said:did the 2 with firearms charges also get illegal entry charges?RMF5630 said:Sam Lowry said:You can find a list of weapons charges here. Let us know how many were for using fists as a weapon.whiterock said:part in bold is serving a lie. And you know it.Osodecentx said:The rioters were actually armed. Some had guns4th said:
If they are armed, as their leader well knowsdeep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Quote:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.Quote:This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.Quote:Quote:
Walking outside in Texas, more than 75% chance you are standing near a person who is armed. It is legal in Texas, not so in DC
Just because People carry weapons doesnt mean they are going to shoot you. I agree
Maybe they were worried about their personal safety because they had seen the clashes with Antifa. Maybe, but it is illegal in DC
There were plenty of those that broke out in DC during that 2 day period of the 5th and 6th If you say so
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
There is nothing remarkable about a protestor holding something that could be used as a weapon. A fist can be used as a weapon, fer crissakes. How many have been charged with crimes involving weapons? How many have been charge with carrying a firearm into the capitol?
If we are to follow your logic, then any protest is an insurrection. Any riot is an insurrection. Any gathering where someone holds a fraternity paddle is an insurrection.
You are being very, very silly.
You've retreated into absurdity because absurdity is all you have left.
A search of firearm turned up 2. There were 2 firearm charges. There were 10 pages of non-firearm weapons charges.
So they were going to overthrow the US Govt with 2 pistols and 50 knives & clubs???
I agree with you arrest them. Anyone with a weapon or that went into Congresspr was violent needs to be arrested and stiff penalties, no arguement. 41 months for Shaman, I am good. He broke in.
I just don't see insurrection or coup. Or it being led by inside US Govt. Sorry.
Osodecentx said:4th and Inches said:some times you have to use logic and avoid emotion.. you will get there one day..Osodecentx said:4th and Inches said:did the 2 with firearms charges also get illegal entry charges?RMF5630 said:Sam Lowry said:You can find a list of weapons charges here. Let us know how many were for using fists as a weapon.whiterock said:part in bold is serving a lie. And you know it.Osodecentx said:The rioters were actually armed. Some had guns4th said:
If they are armed, as their leader well knowsdeep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Quote:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.Quote:This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.Quote:Quote:
Walking outside in Texas, more than 75% chance you are standing near a person who is armed. It is legal in Texas, not so in DC
Just because People carry weapons doesnt mean they are going to shoot you. I agree
Maybe they were worried about their personal safety because they had seen the clashes with Antifa. Maybe, but it is illegal in DC
There were plenty of those that broke out in DC during that 2 day period of the 5th and 6th If you say so
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
There is nothing remarkable about a protestor holding something that could be used as a weapon. A fist can be used as a weapon, fer crissakes. How many have been charged with crimes involving weapons? How many have been charge with carrying a firearm into the capitol?
If we are to follow your logic, then any protest is an insurrection. Any riot is an insurrection. Any gathering where someone holds a fraternity paddle is an insurrection.
You are being very, very silly.
You've retreated into absurdity because absurdity is all you have left.
A search of firearm turned up 2. There were 2 firearm charges. There were 10 pages of non-firearm weapons charges.
So they were going to overthrow the US Govt with 2 pistols and 50 knives & clubs???
I agree with you arrest them. Anyone with a weapon or that went into Congresspr was violent needs to be arrested and stiff penalties, no arguement. 41 months for Shaman, I am good. He broke in.
I just don't see insurrection or coup. Or it being led by inside US Govt. Sorry.
There's a searchable table with a complete list. This is the third or fourth time I've posted it.whiterock said:Unfortunately for your argument, there are no weapons charges of any kind listed or mentioned in the linked article.Sam Lowry said:You can find a list of weapons charges here. Let us know how many were for using fists as a weapon.Quote:part in bold is serving a lie. And you know it.Quote:The rioters were actually armed. Some had gunsQuote:deep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Quote:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.Quote:
This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
There is nothing remarkable about a protestor holding something that could be used as a weapon. A fist can be used as a weapon, fer crissakes. How many have been charged with crimes involving weapons? How many have been charge with carrying a firearm into the capitol?
If we are to follow your logic, then any protest is an insurrection. Any riot is an insurrection. Any gathering where someone holds a fraternity paddle is an insurrection.
You are being very, very silly.
You've retreated into absurdity because absurdity is all you have left.
4th and Inches said:Osodecentx said:4th and Inches said:some times you have to use logic and avoid emotion.. you will get there one day..Osodecentx said:4th and Inches said:did the 2 with firearms charges also get illegal entry charges?RMF5630 said:Sam Lowry said:You can find a list of weapons charges here. Let us know how many were for using fists as a weapon.whiterock said:part in bold is serving a lie. And you know it.Osodecentx said:The rioters were actually armed. Some had guns4th said:
If they are armed, as their leader well knowsdeep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Quote:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.Quote:This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.Quote:Quote:
Walking outside in Texas, more than 75% chance you are standing near a person who is armed. It is legal in Texas, not so in DC
Just because People carry weapons doesnt mean they are going to shoot you. I agree
Maybe they were worried about their personal safety because they had seen the clashes with Antifa. Maybe, but it is illegal in DC
There were plenty of those that broke out in DC during that 2 day period of the 5th and 6th If you say so
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
There is nothing remarkable about a protestor holding something that could be used as a weapon. A fist can be used as a weapon, fer crissakes. How many have been charged with crimes involving weapons? How many have been charge with carrying a firearm into the capitol?
If we are to follow your logic, then any protest is an insurrection. Any riot is an insurrection. Any gathering where someone holds a fraternity paddle is an insurrection.
You are being very, very silly.
You've retreated into absurdity because absurdity is all you have left.
A search of firearm turned up 2. There were 2 firearm charges. There were 10 pages of non-firearm weapons charges.
So they were going to overthrow the US Govt with 2 pistols and 50 knives & clubs???
I agree with you arrest them. Anyone with a weapon or that went into Congresspr was violent needs to be arrested and stiff penalties, no arguement. 41 months for Shaman, I am good. He broke in.
I just don't see insurrection or coup. Or it being led by inside US Govt. Sorry.
Osodecentx said:4th and Inches said:Osodecentx said:4th and Inches said:some times you have to use logic and avoid emotion.. you will get there one day..Osodecentx said:4th and Inches said:did the 2 with firearms charges also get illegal entry charges?RMF5630 said:Sam Lowry said:You can find a list of weapons charges here. Let us know how many were for using fists as a weapon.whiterock said:part in bold is serving a lie. And you know it.Osodecentx said:The rioters were actually armed. Some had guns4th said:
If they are armed, as their leader well knowsdeep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Quote:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.Quote:This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.Quote:Quote:
Walking outside in Texas, more than 75% chance you are standing near a person who is armed. It is legal in Texas, not so in DC
Just because People carry weapons doesnt mean they are going to shoot you. I agree
Maybe they were worried about their personal safety because they had seen the clashes with Antifa. Maybe, but it is illegal in DC
There were plenty of those that broke out in DC during that 2 day period of the 5th and 6th If you say so
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
There is nothing remarkable about a protestor holding something that could be used as a weapon. A fist can be used as a weapon, fer crissakes. How many have been charged with crimes involving weapons? How many have been charge with carrying a firearm into the capitol?
If we are to follow your logic, then any protest is an insurrection. Any riot is an insurrection. Any gathering where someone holds a fraternity paddle is an insurrection.
You are being very, very silly.
You've retreated into absurdity because absurdity is all you have left.
A search of firearm turned up 2. There were 2 firearm charges. There were 10 pages of non-firearm weapons charges.
So they were going to overthrow the US Govt with 2 pistols and 50 knives & clubs???
I agree with you arrest them. Anyone with a weapon or that went into Congresspr was violent needs to be arrested and stiff penalties, no arguement. 41 months for Shaman, I am good. He broke in.
I just don't see insurrection or coup. Or it being led by inside US Govt. Sorry.
Osodecentx said:4th and Inches said:Osodecentx said:4th and Inches said:some times you have to use logic and avoid emotion.. you will get there one day..Osodecentx said:4th and Inches said:did the 2 with firearms charges also get illegal entry charges?RMF5630 said:Sam Lowry said:You can find a list of weapons charges here. Let us know how many were for using fists as a weapon.whiterock said:part in bold is serving a lie. And you know it.Osodecentx said:The rioters were actually armed. Some had guns4th said:
If they are armed, as their leader well knowsdeep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Quote:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.Quote:This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.Quote:Quote:
Walking outside in Texas, more than 75% chance you are standing near a person who is armed. It is legal in Texas, not so in DC
Just because People carry weapons doesnt mean they are going to shoot you. I agree
Maybe they were worried about their personal safety because they had seen the clashes with Antifa. Maybe, but it is illegal in DC
There were plenty of those that broke out in DC during that 2 day period of the 5th and 6th If you say so
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
There is nothing remarkable about a protestor holding something that could be used as a weapon. A fist can be used as a weapon, fer crissakes. How many have been charged with crimes involving weapons? How many have been charge with carrying a firearm into the capitol?
If we are to follow your logic, then any protest is an insurrection. Any riot is an insurrection. Any gathering where someone holds a fraternity paddle is an insurrection.
You are being very, very silly.
You've retreated into absurdity because absurdity is all you have left.
A search of firearm turned up 2. There were 2 firearm charges. There were 10 pages of non-firearm weapons charges.
So they were going to overthrow the US Govt with 2 pistols and 50 knives & clubs???
I agree with you arrest them. Anyone with a weapon or that went into Congresspr was violent needs to be arrested and stiff penalties, no arguement. 41 months for Shaman, I am good. He broke in.
I just don't see insurrection or coup. Or it being led by inside US Govt. Sorry.
4th and Inches said:Osodecentx said:4th and Inches said:Osodecentx said:4th and Inches said:some times you have to use logic and avoid emotion.. you will get there one day..Osodecentx said:4th and Inches said:did the 2 with firearms charges also get illegal entry charges?RMF5630 said:Sam Lowry said:You can find a list of weapons charges here. Let us know how many were for using fists as a weapon.whiterock said:part in bold is serving a lie. And you know it.Osodecentx said:The rioters were actually armed. Some had guns4th said:
If they are armed, as their leader well knowsdeep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Quote:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.Quote:This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.Quote:Quote:
Walking outside in Texas, more than 75% chance you are standing near a person who is armed. It is legal in Texas, not so in DC
Just because People carry weapons doesnt mean they are going to shoot you. I agree
Maybe they were worried about their personal safety because they had seen the clashes with Antifa. Maybe, but it is illegal in DC
There were plenty of those that broke out in DC during that 2 day period of the 5th and 6th If you say so
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
There is nothing remarkable about a protestor holding something that could be used as a weapon. A fist can be used as a weapon, fer crissakes. How many have been charged with crimes involving weapons? How many have been charge with carrying a firearm into the capitol?
If we are to follow your logic, then any protest is an insurrection. Any riot is an insurrection. Any gathering where someone holds a fraternity paddle is an insurrection.
You are being very, very silly.
You've retreated into absurdity because absurdity is all you have left.
A search of firearm turned up 2. There were 2 firearm charges. There were 10 pages of non-firearm weapons charges.
So they were going to overthrow the US Govt with 2 pistols and 50 knives & clubs???
I agree with you arrest them. Anyone with a weapon or that went into Congresspr was violent needs to be arrested and stiff penalties, no arguement. 41 months for Shaman, I am good. He broke in.
I just don't see insurrection or coup. Or it being led by inside US Govt. Sorry.
Now, back to the thread ...4th and Inches said:
4th and Inches said:
Bannon to testifyRMF5630 said:Who knows, 2nd Amendment demonstration that they should be able to carry? As OldBear said, they did not use them even though Capitol Police did.Osodecentx said:The rioters were actually armed. Some had guns4th and Inches said:deep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Osodecentx said:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.whiterock said:This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.Osodecentx said:
Trump said he was disappointed in Pence to the rallyQuote:Walking outside in Texas, more than 75% chance you are standing near a person who is armed. It is legal in Texas, not so in DCQuote:If they are armed, as their leader well knowsQuote:"lets walk to the capitol.." sounds terrifying, at least it wasnt hot outsideQuote:"I'm disappointed in Pence, he didn't do the right thing"Quote:
So, you tell someone you are disappointed in your kid and that is a signal to your neighbors to hang them???? You guys are really reaching to create something not there.
Trump knows rioters are armed
"Let's walk to the Capitol, I'll go with you"
Trump orders the SS agents to take him to the Capitol
Just because People carry weapons doesnt mean they are going to shoot you. I agree
Maybe they were worried about their personal safety because they had seen the clashes with Antifa. Maybe, but it is illegal in DC
There were plenty of those that broke out in DC during that 2 day period of the 5th and 6th If you say so
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
Once again, does actions (what they actually did) outweigh speculation or supposition?
I saw 4 listed for carrying a Firearm without a license.Sam Lowry said:You can find a list of weapons charges here. Let us know how many were for using fists as a weapon.whiterock said:part in bold is serving a lie. And you know it.Osodecentx said:The rioters were actually armed. Some had guns4th said:
If they are armed, as their leader well knowsdeep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Quote:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.Quote:This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.Quote:Quote:
Walking outside in Texas, more than 75% chance you are standing near a person who is armed. It is legal in Texas, not so in DC
Just because People carry weapons doesnt mean they are going to shoot you. I agree
Maybe they were worried about their personal safety because they had seen the clashes with Antifa. Maybe, but it is illegal in DC
There were plenty of those that broke out in DC during that 2 day period of the 5th and 6th If you say so
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
There is nothing remarkable about a protestor holding something that could be used as a weapon. A fist can be used as a weapon, fer crissakes. How many have been charged with crimes involving weapons? How many have been charge with carrying a firearm into the capitol?
If we are to follow your logic, then any protest is an insurrection. Any riot is an insurrection. Any gathering where someone holds a fraternity paddle is an insurrection.
You are being very, very silly.
You've retreated into absurdity because absurdity is all you have left.
zero shootings also zero insurections happened outside.. only riotsSam Lowry said:
Plenty of violence happened outside the building. In fact most of it did.
What definitions are we using today?4th and Inches said:zero shootings also zero insurections happened outside.. only riotsSam Lowry said:
Plenty of violence happened outside the building. In fact most of it did.
since the only shooting of the day happened inside the capital, zero shootings outside. Since the insurrection breached the capital, zero insurrections outside.Sam Lowry said:What definitions are we using today?4th and Inches said:zero shootings also zero insurections happened outside.. only riotsSam Lowry said:
Plenty of violence happened outside the building. In fact most of it did.
Sam Lowry said:
Plenty of violence happened outside the building. In fact most of it did.
Osodecentx said:Bannon to testifyRMF5630 said:Who knows, 2nd Amendment demonstration that they should be able to carry? As OldBear said, they did not use them even though Capitol Police did.Osodecentx said:The rioters were actually armed. Some had guns4th and Inches said:deep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Osodecentx said:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.whiterock said:This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.Osodecentx said:
Trump said he was disappointed in Pence to the rallyQuote:Walking outside in Texas, more than 75% chance you are standing near a person who is armed. It is legal in Texas, not so in DCQuote:If they are armed, as their leader well knowsQuote:"lets walk to the capitol.." sounds terrifying, at least it wasnt hot outsideQuote:"I'm disappointed in Pence, he didn't do the right thing"Quote:
So, you tell someone you are disappointed in your kid and that is a signal to your neighbors to hang them???? You guys are really reaching to create something not there.
Trump knows rioters are armed
"Let's walk to the Capitol, I'll go with you"
Trump orders the SS agents to take him to the Capitol
Just because People carry weapons doesnt mean they are going to shoot you. I agree
Maybe they were worried about their personal safety because they had seen the clashes with Antifa. Maybe, but it is illegal in DC
There were plenty of those that broke out in DC during that 2 day period of the 5th and 6th If you say so
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
Once again, does actions (what they actually did) outweigh speculation or supposition?
Bannon, Facing Jail and Fines, Agrees to Testify to Jan. 6 Panel
Stephen K. Bannon, the former Trump campaign manager and White House adviser, made the abrupt about-face after the former president authorized him to talk to investigators.
WASHINGTON With his criminal trial for contempt of Congress approaching, Stephen K. Bannon, an ally of former President Donald J. Trump's who was involved in his plans to overturn the 2020 election, has informed the House committee investigating the Capitol attack that he is now willing to testify, according to two letters obtained by The New York Times.
His decision is a remarkable about-face for Mr. Bannon, who until Saturday had been among the most obstinate and defiant of the committee's potential witnesses. He had promised to turn the criminal case against him into the "misdemeanor from hell" for the Justice Department.
But with the possibility of two years in jail and large fines looming on the horizon, Mr. Bannon has been authorized to testify by Mr. Trump, his lawyer told the committee late on Saturday in a letter, which was reported earlier by The Guardian.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/10/us/politics/bannon-jan-6-trump.html
4th and Inches said:since the only shooting of the day happened inside the capital, zero shootings outside. Since the insurrection breached the capital, zero insurrections outside.Sam Lowry said:What definitions are we using today?4th and Inches said:zero shootings also zero insurections happened outside.. only riotsSam Lowry said:
Plenty of violence happened outside the building. In fact most of it did.
Either we had a failed insurrection at the white house at end of May 2020 as well or we had a riot outside the capital on January 6. One can't be one thing without the other thing being the same thing.
Happy monday!
Same question to you.whiterock said:Sam Lowry said:
Plenty of violence happened outside the building. In fact most of it did.
….(smile)…..you further impeach your insurrection case.
Forest Bueller_bf said:I saw 4 listed for carrying a Firearm without a license.Sam Lowry said:You can find a list of weapons charges here. Let us know how many were for using fists as a weapon.whiterock said:part in bold is serving a lie. And you know it.Osodecentx said:The rioters were actually armed. Some had guns4th said:
If they are armed, as their leader well knowsdeep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Quote:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.Quote:This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.Quote:Quote:
Walking outside in Texas, more than 75% chance you are standing near a person who is armed. It is legal in Texas, not so in DC
Just because People carry weapons doesnt mean they are going to shoot you. I agree
Maybe they were worried about their personal safety because they had seen the clashes with Antifa. Maybe, but it is illegal in DC
There were plenty of those that broke out in DC during that 2 day period of the 5th and 6th If you say so
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
There is nothing remarkable about a protestor holding something that could be used as a weapon. A fist can be used as a weapon, fer crissakes. How many have been charged with crimes involving weapons? How many have been charge with carrying a firearm into the capitol?
If we are to follow your logic, then any protest is an insurrection. Any riot is an insurrection. Any gathering where someone holds a fraternity paddle is an insurrection.
You are being very, very silly.
You've retreated into absurdity because absurdity is all you have left.
I think the lowest level charge was...."Parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol building"
They also made a distinction between "knowingly entering a restricted building" and simply "entering a restricted building".
Not sure what the difference was, but maybe some were so clueless they didn't even know it was restricted?
None of those listed with carrying without a license were shown to enter the capital either "knowingly or otherwise. Two seemed to be stopped at a checkpoint.
Or to the prosecutors, or to anyone really. It's just nit-picking in hopeless search of a point.Golem said:Forest Bueller_bf said:I saw 4 listed for carrying a Firearm without a license.Sam Lowry said:You can find a list of weapons charges here. Let us know how many were for using fists as a weapon.whiterock said:part in bold is serving a lie. And you know it.Osodecentx said:The rioters were actually armed. Some had guns4th said:
If they are armed, as their leader well knowsdeep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Quote:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.Quote:This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.Quote:Quote:
Walking outside in Texas, more than 75% chance you are standing near a person who is armed. It is legal in Texas, not so in DC
Just because People carry weapons doesnt mean they are going to shoot you. I agree
Maybe they were worried about their personal safety because they had seen the clashes with Antifa. Maybe, but it is illegal in DC
There were plenty of those that broke out in DC during that 2 day period of the 5th and 6th If you say so
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
There is nothing remarkable about a protestor holding something that could be used as a weapon. A fist can be used as a weapon, fer crissakes. How many have been charged with crimes involving weapons? How many have been charge with carrying a firearm into the capitol?
If we are to follow your logic, then any protest is an insurrection. Any riot is an insurrection. Any gathering where someone holds a fraternity paddle is an insurrection.
You are being very, very silly.
You've retreated into absurdity because absurdity is all you have left.
I think the lowest level charge was...."Parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol building"
They also made a distinction between "knowingly entering a restricted building" and simply "entering a restricted building".
Not sure what the difference was, but maybe some were so clueless they didn't even know it was restricted?
None of those listed with carrying without a license were shown to enter the capital either "knowingly or otherwise. Two seemed to be stopped at a checkpoint.
Brother, none of this matters to crazed #J6Anon left.
Sam Lowry said:Or to the prosecutors, or to anyone really. It's just nit-picking in hopeless search of a point.Golem said:Forest Bueller_bf said:I saw 4 listed for carrying a Firearm without a license.Sam Lowry said:You can find a list of weapons charges here. Let us know how many were for using fists as a weapon.whiterock said:part in bold is serving a lie. And you know it.Osodecentx said:The rioters were actually armed. Some had guns4th said:
If they are armed, as their leader well knowsdeep down I am believing that riots typically have armed demonstrators..Quote:Deep down, I'm believing contemporaneous police observations. Armed demonstrators are a significant finding.Quote:This post shows that, deep down, you know you've lost the argument and are hanging on to an insignificant detail.Quote:Quote:
Walking outside in Texas, more than 75% chance you are standing near a person who is armed. It is legal in Texas, not so in DC
Just because People carry weapons doesnt mean they are going to shoot you. I agree
Maybe they were worried about their personal safety because they had seen the clashes with Antifa. Maybe, but it is illegal in DC
There were plenty of those that broke out in DC during that 2 day period of the 5th and 6th If you say so
Here's the facts:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/armed-insurrection-what-weapons-capitol-rioters-carry
10 months after J6, FBI still had not found any evidence that firearms were used in the J6 riot. Sure, time might have uncovered another gun or three in the general vicinity of the riot. Yet here you are, making the case that Trump was told someone was arrested with a gun and still wanted to go to the Capitol, thereby providing the conclusive turn in the case which makes him leader of an insurrectionist. The list of "weapons" noted at link is carried at almost any riot, so if we are to accept the premise of your argument, ANY riot is an insurrection.
If you are going to push the Reichstag Fire nonsense, you could do a much better job than you are doing here.
How many guns were fired at the capital that day? We all know the answer.. we all know the results.
Maybe, just maybe, those guns were not for what you think they were but what they are actually for..
What were the guns actually for?
There is nothing remarkable about a protestor holding something that could be used as a weapon. A fist can be used as a weapon, fer crissakes. How many have been charged with crimes involving weapons? How many have been charge with carrying a firearm into the capitol?
If we are to follow your logic, then any protest is an insurrection. Any riot is an insurrection. Any gathering where someone holds a fraternity paddle is an insurrection.
You are being very, very silly.
You've retreated into absurdity because absurdity is all you have left.
I think the lowest level charge was...."Parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol building"
They also made a distinction between "knowingly entering a restricted building" and simply "entering a restricted building".
Not sure what the difference was, but maybe some were so clueless they didn't even know it was restricted?
None of those listed with carrying without a license were shown to enter the capital either "knowingly or otherwise. Two seemed to be stopped at a checkpoint.
Brother, none of this matters to crazed #J6Anon left.
