There are probably hundreds of hours of footage. You can most certainly present part of a tape and deliberately omit the rest; otherwise the hearings would never end.4th and Inches said:Sam Lowry said:Deceptive editing isn't "okay." What you don't realize is that the MAGA obsession with Ray Epps doesn't automatically make him relevant to anything and everything. What would including him in the presentation prove, exactly?4th and Inches said:blah blah blah, its ok cause.. TrumpSam Lowry said:I have nothing but pity for you if you think the additional context puts Trump in a better light. As a lawyer I would love to see Trump's defenders walk into that trap.4th and Inches said:LoL at you thinking its ok.. The prosecuter shows your client in a certain light for the jury and you sit there like its fine.. awesome, i have nothing but pity for anyone you represent as a lawyer.Sam Lowry said:LOL at the old "selective editing" defense...the last refuge of a scoundrel.4th and Inches said:she purposefully left off words of the text to change the context- fed definition of a fraud is one who knew or should have known and acted in reckless disreguard for the truth.. she knew and presented the material information in a very biased way. How can you make a choice if you are not presented with the facts. Altered/edited video, out of context/edited quotes. She is not the hero of democracy you claim.Guy Noir said:What makes her a fraud? You do not back up your opinion with facts. She has taken a stand to the detriment of her political position.ScottS said:Cobretti said:Liz Cheney reads a Trump tweet from 1/6, but neglects to finish reading the tweet which reads "Go home with love & in peace." pic.twitter.com/zdfW8gNGba
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) June 10, 2022
She's a fraud. Her days are numbered.
She is a dirty prosecuter hiding vital info from the jury and the defense gets not opportunity to cross or present opposing evidence..
Truth is nobody watched it.. less than Biden's SOTU address.. less than the standard nightly news.. early polling is showing a 7 percent decline in people who think Trump caused jan 6th vs this time in 2021
There are times when deceptive editing is a legitimate issue. Other times, like now, it's a scattershot defense born out of desperation.
"Oh look, there's footage of a person who was the subject of a long debunked conspiracy theory that's still being pushed by the lunatic fringe. What do you say to that, Rep. Cheney?"
Good luck with that.
Your denials cost you credibility..
A lawyer who has argued in front of scotus had this to say about videos played during the hearing..
"They edited things out. If a prosecutor ever did that, they could be disbarred. You can't present part of the tape and deliberately omit the rest of the tape in order to mislead the audience."
Seems altering evidence is more important than you state
jan 5th he proclaimed we are going into the capital. Jan 6th he is seen at the capital whispering in a persons ear and then suddenly there is a push by the crowd lead by the guy who got whispered to..
Ray epps is not a conspiracy theory, there is an obvious connection that is being withheld. Plenty of others in jail for same or less..
Doing so in order to mislead is of course different. But the burden is on you to show that. "Selective editing blah blah blah" doesn't cut it.