I'm not being ungracious to Oldbear because of his beliefs. I'm being ungracious because he's an ******* and a fraud.
you believe oldbear to be somebody other than who he says he is? That is what frauds do.. his differing beliefs do not make him a fraud.Sam Lowry said:
I'm not being ungracious to Oldbear because of his beliefs. I'm being ungracious because he's an ******* and a fraud.
You get a lot of exercise changing subject and moving goal posts Sam, but your posts tell the truth that for all your posturing, it is you and Oso who can't be honest, cant be decent, and who abandoned all pretense of objectivity, simply because you can't stand a man's style.Sam Lowry said:I'm sure Trump is more than welcome, along with Bannon and whoever else you're saying would make him look good (if you actually had the boldness to say, which of course you don't). There's only one thing Trump and his minions hate more than being silenced, and that's being invited to make their case. You and they have that in common.Oldbear83 said:
Sam: "Disqualification is no punishment"
It damn well is, especially without due process.
Not sure anymore where you are from, Sam, but it's as un-American as it gets, to rig things so the opponent you don't like is not even allowed to compete.
He says he's the guy who argues in good faith and doesn't avoid or obfuscate. He's not that guy. I can rely on him not to answer a substantive question about 99 percent of the time.4th and Inches said:you believe oldbear to be somebody other than who he says he is? That is what frauds do.. his differing beliefs do not make him a fraud.Sam Lowry said:
I'm not being ungracious to Oldbear because of his beliefs. I'm being ungracious because he's an ******* and a fraud.
Thank you 4th and Inches.4th and Inches said:you believe oldbear to be somebody other than who he says he is? That is what frauds do.. his differing beliefs do not make him a fraud.Sam Lowry said:
I'm not being ungracious to Oldbear because of his beliefs. I'm being ungracious because he's an ******* and a fraud.
In English:Sam Lowry said:
I'm not being ungracious to Oldbear because of his beliefs. I'm being ungracious because he's an ******* and a fraud.
That's no way for the Grand Dragon of the Trump cult to talk.Oldbear83 said:Not my thing, but if I do run into a Klan man I will tell him you and Sam are ready to sign up. You already have your rope ready.Osodecentx said:Klavern meeting soon?Oldbear83 said:
Oso: "Grand Dragon of the Trump cult"
Your idiocy is noted
It's been a long time since I saw a post that managed to be that far from true.
"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."Oldbear83 said:From your inability to advance the discussion Oso, and your stubborn devotion to the malicious premise of the Left, I'd have to say no.Osodecentx said:Do I have a functional brain?Oldbear83 said:
You really seem to get into Cosplaying as the Red Queen.
And that is called legislative oversight of the Executive branch. If Republicans can do it so can the DemocratsHarrison Bergeron said:Yes.Osodecentx said:When Republicans take the House, should a Congressional committee be allowed to exercise oversight of the Biden Administration?Harrison Bergeron said:The difference is a question of democracy. Should the people decide or a cartoon communist show trial.Sam Lowry said:If everyone had a moral compass, we wouldn't have threads like this. We'd all just agree that Trump is disqualified from holding office again and move on. No one is particularly interested in seeing him prosecuted.Oldbear83 said:As repeatedly demonstrated, of course I do.Osodecentx said:Oldbear83 said:
Oso: "Are we allowed to ask questions?"
Democrats on the committee are allowed to ask questions
RINOs on the committee are allowed to do what the Democrats tell them to do
The media reports what the Democrats tell them to say.
But the accused is not allowed a defense, there is no cross-examination or counter evidence. In fact, the "evidence" allowed by the Democrats cropped out anything that made Trump look good or at least better.
Of course we all knew that, but it doesn't matter to those who are only out to get Trump.
Go suck a lemon. Change is coming, pal.
Do you have an argument?
The real question is whether you and Sam have anything like a moral compass?
I disagree, but unlike Oldbear you make an argument that is plausibleRMF5630 said:The case has been made pretty clearly, you just don't agree and don't seem to have the grace to at least give those that disagree the credit of their believes.Sam Lowry said:I'm sure Trump is more than welcome, along with Bannon and whoever else you're saying would make him look good (if you actually had the boldness to say, which of course you don't). There's only one thing Trump's minions hate more than being silenced, and that's being asked to make their case. You and they have that in common.Oldbear83 said:
Sam: "Disqualification is no punishment"
It damn well is, especially without due process.
Not sure anymore where you are from, Sam, but it's as un-American as it gets, to rig things so the opponent you don't like is not even allowed to compete.
Both sides have points going for it, but it is not a slam dunk.
Did Trump act poorly, yes.
Did Trump try to show his displeasure, yes.
Did he think he was being clever by doing a demonstration after the Summer of Love riots, probably.
Did it backfire, yes.
Did he try to make Congress feel uncomfortable, probably as uncomfortable as he felt in the summer, probably.
Did he try to overthrow the Government, No way.
Did he organize an insurrection? No.
Did he authorize SecDef to do what he needed, yes. (under oath)
Whether or not Congress has the power to hold a Commission, is not the question. It does. But, it was done clumsily and that has left it open to attack. Choosing Cheney to lead it was a mistake, too much bad blood for objectivity.
That is my take based on the data
I am often labeled with defending Trump even though I tend to bring up standards, norms, and traditions and how Trump is not privy to those..Oldbear83 said:In English:Sam Lowry said:
I'm not being ungracious to Oldbear because of his beliefs. I'm being ungracious because he's an ******* and a fraud.
Sam is a fraud because his delusion requires he despise and attack anyone who would defend Trump, regardless of the facts and regardless of the Constitution.
Sam plays the shadow role of Lucifer from Paradise Lost, but without Milton's eloquence or really any kind of moral defense.
'Spite uber alles' seems to be Sam's dominant spirit.
From what was Trump excluded Day1?4th and Inches said:I am often labeled with defending Trump even though I tend to bring up standards, norms, and traditions and how Trump is not privy to those..Oldbear83 said:In English:Sam Lowry said:
I'm not being ungracious to Oldbear because of his beliefs. I'm being ungracious because he's an ******* and a fraud.
Sam is a fraud because his delusion requires he despise and attack anyone who would defend Trump, regardless of the facts and regardless of the Constitution.
Sam plays the shadow role of Lucifer from Paradise Lost, but without Milton's eloquence or really any kind of moral defense.
'Spite uber alles' seems to be Sam's dominant spirit.
Those who stand on norms and tradition should stand with me but instead claim exception because, get this, Trump didnt follow standards and tradition. Instead those that should be upset by the exclusion, they claim whataboutism and deflection. Its Trumps fault he was excluded from Day 1.
Whataboutism would be if you said Democrats were excluding Republicans and I said what about that time when Republicans excluded Democrats. That's not what happened. Republicans excluded themselves here.4th and Inches said:I am often labeled with defending Trump even though I tend to bring up standards, norms, and traditions and how Trump is not privy to those..Oldbear83 said:In English:Sam Lowry said:
I'm not being ungracious to Oldbear because of his beliefs. I'm being ungracious because he's an ******* and a fraud.
Sam is a fraud because his delusion requires he despise and attack anyone who would defend Trump, regardless of the facts and regardless of the Constitution.
Sam plays the shadow role of Lucifer from Paradise Lost, but without Milton's eloquence or really any kind of moral defense.
'Spite uber alles' seems to be Sam's dominant spirit.
Those who stand on norms and tradition should stand with me but instead claim exception because, get this, Trump didnt follow standards and tradition. Instead those that should be upset by the exclusion, they claim whataboutism and deflection. Its Trumps fault he was excluded from Day 1.
Yes, that still applies to you, Oso.Osodecentx said:"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."Oldbear83 said:From your inability to advance the discussion Oso, and your stubborn devotion to the malicious premise of the Left, I'd have to say no.Osodecentx said:Do I have a functional brain?Oldbear83 said:
You really seem to get into Cosplaying as the Red Queen.
"You're even more bitter now. Maybe you should just stay away from the hearings."Oldbear83 said:Yes, that still applies to you, Oso.Osodecentx said:"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."Oldbear83 said:From your inability to advance the discussion Oso, and your stubborn devotion to the malicious premise of the Left, I'd have to say no.Osodecentx said:Do I have a functional brain?Oldbear83 said:
You really seem to get into Cosplaying as the Red Queen.
Instead of repeating it, maybe you should ponder its meaning ?
we will get there eventually but lets start here and see where it goes..Osodecentx said:From what was Trump excluded Day1?4th and Inches said:I am often labeled with defending Trump even though I tend to bring up standards, norms, and traditions and how Trump is not privy to those..Oldbear83 said:In English:Sam Lowry said:
I'm not being ungracious to Oldbear because of his beliefs. I'm being ungracious because he's an ******* and a fraud.
Sam is a fraud because his delusion requires he despise and attack anyone who would defend Trump, regardless of the facts and regardless of the Constitution.
Sam plays the shadow role of Lucifer from Paradise Lost, but without Milton's eloquence or really any kind of moral defense.
'Spite uber alles' seems to be Sam's dominant spirit.
Those who stand on norms and tradition should stand with me but instead claim exception because, get this, Trump didnt follow standards and tradition. Instead those that should be upset by the exclusion, they claim whataboutism and deflection. Its Trumps fault he was excluded from Day 1.
I agree with this: The ensuing three years of sensationalized demands for investigations and hearings have kept much of the real work of government from getting done and continue to pit supporters and detractors against each other.4th and Inches said:we will get there eventually but lets start here and see where it goes..Osodecentx said:From what was Trump excluded Day1?4th and Inches said:I am often labeled with defending Trump even though I tend to bring up standards, norms, and traditions and how Trump is not privy to those..Oldbear83 said:In English:Sam Lowry said:
I'm not being ungracious to Oldbear because of his beliefs. I'm being ungracious because he's an ******* and a fraud.
Sam is a fraud because his delusion requires he despise and attack anyone who would defend Trump, regardless of the facts and regardless of the Constitution.
Sam plays the shadow role of Lucifer from Paradise Lost, but without Milton's eloquence or really any kind of moral defense.
'Spite uber alles' seems to be Sam's dominant spirit.
Those who stand on norms and tradition should stand with me but instead claim exception because, get this, Trump didnt follow standards and tradition. Instead those that should be upset by the exclusion, they claim whataboutism and deflection. Its Trumps fault he was excluded from Day 1.
https://nationalcenter.org/project21/2020/01/03/the-real-threat-to-civil-rights-trump-haters-by-donna-jackson/
Minus the Jim Crow analogy, she had a good point at the time. A lot changed in a year.4th and Inches said:we will get there eventually but lets start here and see where it goes..Osodecentx said:From what was Trump excluded Day1?4th and Inches said:I am often labeled with defending Trump even though I tend to bring up standards, norms, and traditions and how Trump is not privy to those..Oldbear83 said:In English:Sam Lowry said:
I'm not being ungracious to Oldbear because of his beliefs. I'm being ungracious because he's an ******* and a fraud.
Sam is a fraud because his delusion requires he despise and attack anyone who would defend Trump, regardless of the facts and regardless of the Constitution.
Sam plays the shadow role of Lucifer from Paradise Lost, but without Milton's eloquence or really any kind of moral defense.
'Spite uber alles' seems to be Sam's dominant spirit.
Those who stand on norms and tradition should stand with me but instead claim exception because, get this, Trump didnt follow standards and tradition. Instead those that should be upset by the exclusion, they claim whataboutism and deflection. Its Trumps fault he was excluded from Day 1.
https://nationalcenter.org/project21/2020/01/03/the-real-threat-to-civil-rights-trump-haters-by-donna-jackson/
Some wise person told you that, Oso? You should have listened.Osodecentx said:"You're even more bitter now. Maybe you should just stay away from the hearings."Oldbear83 said:Yes, that still applies to you, Oso.Osodecentx said:"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."Oldbear83 said:From your inability to advance the discussion Oso, and your stubborn devotion to the malicious premise of the Left, I'd have to say no.Osodecentx said:Do I have a functional brain?Oldbear83 said:
You really seem to get into Cosplaying as the Red Queen.
Instead of repeating it, maybe you should ponder its meaning ?
I have no problem with the conversation, I thought it was good and beat the rugs on both sides. I still believe that if there was wrong doing in the nature they imply, he would have been charged last year.Osodecentx said:I disagree, but unlike Oldbear you make an argument that is plausibleRMF5630 said:The case has been made pretty clearly, you just don't agree and don't seem to have the grace to at least give those that disagree the credit of their believes.Sam Lowry said:I'm sure Trump is more than welcome, along with Bannon and whoever else you're saying would make him look good (if you actually had the boldness to say, which of course you don't). There's only one thing Trump's minions hate more than being silenced, and that's being asked to make their case. You and they have that in common.Oldbear83 said:
Sam: "Disqualification is no punishment"
It damn well is, especially without due process.
Not sure anymore where you are from, Sam, but it's as un-American as it gets, to rig things so the opponent you don't like is not even allowed to compete.
Both sides have points going for it, but it is not a slam dunk.
Did Trump act poorly, yes.
Did Trump try to show his displeasure, yes.
Did he think he was being clever by doing a demonstration after the Summer of Love riots, probably.
Did it backfire, yes.
Did he try to make Congress feel uncomfortable, probably as uncomfortable as he felt in the summer, probably.
Did he try to overthrow the Government, No way.
Did he organize an insurrection? No.
Did he authorize SecDef to do what he needed, yes. (under oath)
Whether or not Congress has the power to hold a Commission, is not the question. It does. But, it was done clumsily and that has left it open to attack. Choosing Cheney to lead it was a mistake, too much bad blood for objectivity.
That is my take based on the data
"Hey, I've lost count. How many times now have you decide not to man up and admit you were wrong?"Oldbear83 said:Some wise person told you that, Oso? You should have listened.Osodecentx said:"You're even more bitter now. Maybe you should just stay away from the hearings."Oldbear83 said:Yes, that still applies to you, Oso.Osodecentx said:"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."Oldbear83 said:From your inability to advance the discussion Oso, and your stubborn devotion to the malicious premise of the Left, I'd have to say no.Osodecentx said:Do I have a functional brain?Oldbear83 said:
You really seem to get into Cosplaying as the Red Queen.
Instead of repeating it, maybe you should ponder its meaning ?
You may be right, but I think it would be wrong for the country to put Trump to a criminal trialRMF5630 said:I have no problem with the conversation, I thought it was good and beat the rugs on both sides. I still believe that if there was wrong doing in the nature they imply, he would have been charged last year.Osodecentx said:I disagree, but unlike Oldbear you make an argument that is plausibleRMF5630 said:The case has been made pretty clearly, you just don't agree and don't seem to have the grace to at least give those that disagree the credit of their believes.Sam Lowry said:I'm sure Trump is more than welcome, along with Bannon and whoever else you're saying would make him look good (if you actually had the boldness to say, which of course you don't). There's only one thing Trump's minions hate more than being silenced, and that's being asked to make their case. You and they have that in common.Oldbear83 said:
Sam: "Disqualification is no punishment"
It damn well is, especially without due process.
Not sure anymore where you are from, Sam, but it's as un-American as it gets, to rig things so the opponent you don't like is not even allowed to compete.
Both sides have points going for it, but it is not a slam dunk.
Did Trump act poorly, yes.
Did Trump try to show his displeasure, yes.
Did he think he was being clever by doing a demonstration after the Summer of Love riots, probably.
Did it backfire, yes.
Did he try to make Congress feel uncomfortable, probably as uncomfortable as he felt in the summer, probably.
Did he try to overthrow the Government, No way.
Did he organize an insurrection? No.
Did he authorize SecDef to do what he needed, yes. (under oath)
Whether or not Congress has the power to hold a Commission, is not the question. It does. But, it was done clumsily and that has left it open to attack. Choosing Cheney to lead it was a mistake, too much bad blood for objectivity.
That is my take based on the data
Hmmm, so was that your mom who told you that one, Oso? Or someone else of importance.Osodecentx said:"Hey, I've lost count. How many times now have you decide not to man up and admit you were wrong?"Oldbear83 said:Some wise person told you that, Oso? You should have listened.Osodecentx said:"You're even more bitter now. Maybe you should just stay away from the hearings."Oldbear83 said:Yes, that still applies to you, Oso.Osodecentx said:"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."Oldbear83 said:From your inability to advance the discussion Oso, and your stubborn devotion to the malicious premise of the Left, I'd have to say no.Osodecentx said:Do I have a functional brain?Oldbear83 said:
You really seem to get into Cosplaying as the Red Queen.
Instead of repeating it, maybe you should ponder its meaning ?
Oldbear83 said:Hmmm, so was that your mom who told you that one, Oso? Or someone else of importance.Osodecentx said:"Hey, I've lost count. How many times now have you decide not to man up and admit you were wrong?"Oldbear83 said:Some wise person told you that, Oso? You should have listened.Osodecentx said:"You're even more bitter now. Maybe you should just stay away from the hearings."Oldbear83 said:Yes, that still applies to you, Oso.Osodecentx said:"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."Oldbear83 said:From your inability to advance the discussion Oso, and your stubborn devotion to the malicious premise of the Left, I'd have to say no.Osodecentx said:Do I have a functional brain?Oldbear83 said:
You really seem to get into Cosplaying as the Red Queen.
Instead of repeating it, maybe you should ponder its meaning ?
Don't sweat it. You do know I just quote back to him his own posts. Note that the posts in quotes lack substance and are his chief mode of response.RMF5630 said:Oldbear83 said:Hmmm, so was that your mom who told you that one, Oso? Or someone else of importance.Osodecentx said:"Hey, I've lost count. How many times now have you decide not to man up and admit you were wrong?"Oldbear83 said:Some wise person told you that, Oso? You should have listened.Osodecentx said:"You're even more bitter now. Maybe you should just stay away from the hearings."Oldbear83 said:Yes, that still applies to you, Oso.Osodecentx said:"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."Oldbear83 said:From your inability to advance the discussion Oso, and your stubborn devotion to the malicious premise of the Left, I'd have to say no.Osodecentx said:Do I have a functional brain?Oldbear83 said:
You really seem to get into Cosplaying as the Red Queen.
Instead of repeating it, maybe you should ponder its meaning ?
No Mothers, man...
"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."Oldbear83 said:Hmmm, so was that your mom who told you that one, Oso? Or someone else of importance.Osodecentx said:"Hey, I've lost count. How many times now have you decide not to man up and admit you were wrong?"Oldbear83 said:Some wise person told you that, Oso? You should have listened.Osodecentx said:"You're even more bitter now. Maybe you should just stay away from the hearings."Oldbear83 said:Yes, that still applies to you, Oso.Osodecentx said:"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."Oldbear83 said:From your inability to advance the discussion Oso, and your stubborn devotion to the malicious premise of the Left, I'd have to say no.Osodecentx said:Do I have a functional brain?Oldbear83 said:
You really seem to get into Cosplaying as the Red Queen.
Instead of repeating it, maybe you should ponder its meaning ?
I was quoting George Carlin, Occupation: FooleOsodecentx said:Don't sweat it. You do know I just quote back to him his own posts. Note that the posts in quotes lack substance and are his chief mode of response.RMF5630 said:Oldbear83 said:Hmmm, so was that your mom who told you that one, Oso? Or someone else of importance.Osodecentx said:"Hey, I've lost count. How many times now have you decide not to man up and admit you were wrong?"Oldbear83 said:Some wise person told you that, Oso? You should have listened.Osodecentx said:"You're even more bitter now. Maybe you should just stay away from the hearings."Oldbear83 said:Yes, that still applies to you, Oso.Osodecentx said:"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."Oldbear83 said:From your inability to advance the discussion Oso, and your stubborn devotion to the malicious premise of the Left, I'd have to say no.Osodecentx said:Do I have a functional brain?Oldbear83 said:
You really seem to get into Cosplaying as the Red Queen.
Instead of repeating it, maybe you should ponder its meaning ?
No Mothers, man...
He's the Board idiot
RMF5630 said:I was quoting George Carlin, Occupation: FooleOsodecentx said:Don't sweat it. You do know I just quote back to him his own posts. Note that the posts in quotes lack substance and are his chief mode of response.RMF5630 said:Oldbear83 said:Hmmm, so was that your mom who told you that one, Oso? Or someone else of importance.Osodecentx said:"Hey, I've lost count. How many times now have you decide not to man up and admit you were wrong?"Oldbear83 said:Some wise person told you that, Oso? You should have listened.Osodecentx said:"You're even more bitter now. Maybe you should just stay away from the hearings."Oldbear83 said:Yes, that still applies to you, Oso.Osodecentx said:"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."Oldbear83 said:From your inability to advance the discussion Oso, and your stubborn devotion to the malicious premise of the Left, I'd have to say no.Osodecentx said:Do I have a functional brain?Oldbear83 said:
You really seem to get into Cosplaying as the Red Queen.
Instead of repeating it, maybe you should ponder its meaning ?
No Mothers, man...
He's the Board idiot
... and Oso imagines that kind of post makes him look suave and urbane ...Osodecentx said:Don't sweat it. You do know I just quote back to him his own posts. Note that the posts in quotes lack substance and are his chief mode of response.RMF5630 said:Oldbear83 said:Hmmm, so was that your mom who told you that one, Oso? Or someone else of importance.Osodecentx said:"Hey, I've lost count. How many times now have you decide not to man up and admit you were wrong?"Oldbear83 said:Some wise person told you that, Oso? You should have listened.Osodecentx said:"You're even more bitter now. Maybe you should just stay away from the hearings."Oldbear83 said:Yes, that still applies to you, Oso.Osodecentx said:"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."Oldbear83 said:From your inability to advance the discussion Oso, and your stubborn devotion to the malicious premise of the Left, I'd have to say no.Osodecentx said:Do I have a functional brain?Oldbear83 said:
You really seem to get into Cosplaying as the Red Queen.
Instead of repeating it, maybe you should ponder its meaning ?
No Mothers, man...
He's the Board idiot
Yes, that one still applies to you as well. Sad that the best you can do is parrot. Or squawkOsodecentx said:"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."Oldbear83 said:Hmmm, so was that your mom who told you that one, Oso? Or someone else of importance.Osodecentx said:"Hey, I've lost count. How many times now have you decide not to man up and admit you were wrong?"Oldbear83 said:Some wise person told you that, Oso? You should have listened.Osodecentx said:"You're even more bitter now. Maybe you should just stay away from the hearings."Oldbear83 said:Yes, that still applies to you, Oso.Osodecentx said:"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."Oldbear83 said:From your inability to advance the discussion Oso, and your stubborn devotion to the malicious premise of the Left, I'd have to say no.Osodecentx said:Do I have a functional brain?Oldbear83 said:
You really seem to get into Cosplaying as the Red Queen.
Instead of repeating it, maybe you should ponder its meaning ?
"You should post less on this subject until you can better control your emotions."Oldbear83 said:... and Oso imagines that kind of post makes him look suave and urbane ...Osodecentx said:Don't sweat it. You do know I just quote back to him his own posts. Note that the posts in quotes lack substance and are his chief mode of response.RMF5630 said:Oldbear83 said:Hmmm, so was that your mom who told you that one, Oso? Or someone else of importance.Osodecentx said:"Hey, I've lost count. How many times now have you decide not to man up and admit you were wrong?"Oldbear83 said:Some wise person told you that, Oso? You should have listened.Osodecentx said:"You're even more bitter now. Maybe you should just stay away from the hearings."Oldbear83 said:Yes, that still applies to you, Oso.Osodecentx said:"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."Oldbear83 said:From your inability to advance the discussion Oso, and your stubborn devotion to the malicious premise of the Left, I'd have to say no.Osodecentx said:Do I have a functional brain?Oldbear83 said:
You really seem to get into Cosplaying as the Red Queen.
Instead of repeating it, maybe you should ponder its meaning ?
No Mothers, man...
He's the Board idiot
1. Trump attempted a planned insurrection.
— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) July 26, 2022
2. Okay, loosely planned.
3. Okay, not planned, but he encouraged it.
4. Okay, he didn't encourage it, but he didn't try to stop it.
5. Okay, he did try to stop the violence, but he should have done more, and sooner, during fog of war.
Yes Oso, that's another one you can repeat but, apparently, refuse to learn.Osodecentx said:"You should post less on this subject until you can better control your emotions."Oldbear83 said:... and Oso imagines that kind of post makes him look suave and urbane ...Osodecentx said:Don't sweat it. You do know I just quote back to him his own posts. Note that the posts in quotes lack substance and are his chief mode of response.RMF5630 said:Oldbear83 said:Hmmm, so was that your mom who told you that one, Oso? Or someone else of importance.Osodecentx said:"Hey, I've lost count. How many times now have you decide not to man up and admit you were wrong?"Oldbear83 said:Some wise person told you that, Oso? You should have listened.Osodecentx said:"You're even more bitter now. Maybe you should just stay away from the hearings."Oldbear83 said:Yes, that still applies to you, Oso.Osodecentx said:"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."Oldbear83 said:From your inability to advance the discussion Oso, and your stubborn devotion to the malicious premise of the Left, I'd have to say no.Osodecentx said:Do I have a functional brain?Oldbear83 said:
You really seem to get into Cosplaying as the Red Queen.
Instead of repeating it, maybe you should ponder its meaning ?
No Mothers, man...
He's the Board idiot