JXL said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

JXL said:

---

Booray said:

---

One of the central premises of Trump's supposed greatness was removing America from never ending wars. Yet when Biden completes the removal of America from a never ending war, the negative consequences are a sign of Biden's ineptitude.

One cannot find a better illustration of blind partisanship.

---

Blind partisanship, anyone?

https://thefederalist.com/2021/04/15/media-cheer-biden-withdrawal-from-afghanistan-after-raising-panic-under-trump/

Media Cheer Biden Withdrawal From Afghanistan After Raising Panic Under Trump
Tristan Justice
Corporate media cheered President Joe Biden's Wednesday announcement of withdrawing remaining U.S. forces in Afghanistan by Sept. 11 this year after the same outlets raised hysteria when President Donald Trump pursued the same policy. The former Republican president announced drawdowns of U.S. troops in 2019 and 2020. He was attacked not only by corporate media but also deliberately undermined and lied to by high-ranking federal personnel.

As outlined in a lengthy Twitter thread by Republican public affairs consultant Drew Holden, legacy outlets met Biden's announcement with a sharp contrast in tone to the hysterical coverage that greeted Trump's same pursuits just months ago.

CNN highlighted testimony from foreign policy professionals opposed to the troop withdrawal while Trump was still president, amplifying those who said the decision to pull down forces in Afghanistan "reckless." For Biden, on the other hand, CNN showed him being praised by former President Barack Obama for "bold leadership."

The New York Times engaged in a similar double-standard, offering "news analysis" of Trump's announcements to pull out of Afghanistan that said it was playing into terrorists' hands. Biden was merely quoted as justifying his decision.

Time Magazine, which refused to call Iranian terrorist Qasem Soleimani a terrorist in January of last year, was no different.

"Can Donald Trump accept defeat in Afghanistan?" the publication questioned under Trump on the premise removal was concession while quoting comedian-journalist Trevor Noah, who compared the strategy to German dictator Adolf Hitler's. Biden on the other hand, enjoyed free advertising.

Over at MSNBC, it's the same story. By withdrawing from Afghanistan after nearly two decades, Trump was engaged in dangerous behavior. Biden, however, is making "the right call."

The Washington Post, which infamously eulogized an ISIS terrorist as an "austere religious leader" in its 2019 obituary, predictably followed suit, highlighting warnings from the Pentagon with Trump's announcement and celebrating Biden when he made the same call.

"Trump administration to cut troop levels in Afghanistan despite Pentagon warnings," the Trump-resistance paper wrote in November.

But under Biden, the paper celebrated that "America's longest war may soon be coming to an end."

NPR also hyped fears among "military leaders" under Trump's decision without the same framing applied to Biden's in the lede.

There is no shortage of blatant double-standards of corporate coverage under the Biden administration White House to the immediate predecessor, even less than six months into the new administration. That's so whether it's the coverage of familial scandal to the sex of the White House communications team to the erosion of norms through the unusual termination of career bureaucrats.

In February, news broke that attorneys at the Justice Department appointed by the previous administration were asked to resign by the Biden administration. When Trump did the same thing in 2017, legacy outlets hysterically charged the president with sparking needless controversy.

---

Don't you just love a good media double standard, I know I do

---

If cherry picking data is one's thing and not noting the OAN, Newmax, and Fox's double standard, too then "Yes, one loves a media double standard."

---

Do you have the same regard for the Washington Post and the NY Times as you do for Fox and Newsmax?

---

Waco1947 said:

---

JXL said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

JXL said:

---

Booray said:

---

One of the central premises of Trump's supposed greatness was removing America from never ending wars. Yet when Biden completes the removal of America from a never ending war, the negative consequences are a sign of Biden's ineptitude.

One cannot find a better illustration of blind partisanship.

---

Blind partisanship, anyone?

https://thefederalist.com/2021/04/15/media-cheer-biden-withdrawal-from-afghanistan-after-raising-panic-under-trump/

Media Cheer Biden Withdrawal From Afghanistan After Raising Panic Under Trump
Tristan Justice
Corporate media cheered President Joe Biden's Wednesday announcement of withdrawing remaining U.S. forces in Afghanistan by Sept. 11 this year after the same outlets raised hysteria when President Donald Trump pursued the same policy. The former Republican president announced drawdowns of U.S. troops in 2019 and 2020. He was attacked not only by corporate media but also deliberately undermined and lied to by high-ranking federal personnel.

As outlined in a lengthy Twitter thread by Republican public affairs consultant Drew Holden, legacy outlets met Biden's announcement with a sharp contrast in tone to the hysterical coverage that greeted Trump's same pursuits just months ago.

CNN highlighted testimony from foreign policy professionals opposed to the troop withdrawal while Trump was still president, amplifying those who said the decision to pull down forces in Afghanistan "reckless." For Biden, on the other hand, CNN showed him being praised by former President Barack Obama for "bold leadership."

The New York Times engaged in a similar double-standard, offering "news analysis" of Trump's announcements to pull out of Afghanistan that said it was playing into terrorists' hands. Biden was merely quoted as justifying his decision.

Time Magazine, which refused to call Iranian terrorist Qasem Soleimani a terrorist in January of last year, was no different.

"Can Donald Trump accept defeat in Afghanistan?" the publication questioned under Trump on the premise removal was concession while quoting comedian-journalist Trevor Noah, who compared the strategy to German dictator Adolf Hitler's. Biden on the other hand, enjoyed free advertising.

Over at MSNBC, it's the same story. By withdrawing from Afghanistan after nearly two decades, Trump was engaged in dangerous behavior. Biden, however, is making "the right call."

The Washington Post, which infamously eulogized an ISIS terrorist as an "austere religious leader" in its 2019 obituary, predictably followed suit, highlighting warnings from the Pentagon with Trump's announcement and celebrating Biden when he made the same call.

"Trump administration to cut troop levels in Afghanistan despite Pentagon warnings," the Trump-resistance paper wrote in November.

But under Biden, the paper celebrated that "America's longest war may soon be coming to an end."

NPR also hyped fears among "military leaders" under Trump's decision without the same framing applied to Biden's in the lede.

There is no shortage of blatant double-standards of corporate coverage under the Biden administration White House to the immediate predecessor, even less than six months into the new administration. That's so whether it's the coverage of familial scandal to the sex of the White House communications team to the erosion of norms through the unusual termination of career bureaucrats.

In February, news broke that attorneys at the Justice Department appointed by the previous administration were asked to resign by the Biden administration. When Trump did the same thing in 2017, legacy outlets hysterically charged the president with sparking needless controversy.

---

Don't you just love a good media double standard, I know I do

---

If cherry picking data is one's thing and not noting the OAN, Newmax, and Fox's double standard, too then "Yes, one loves a media double standard."

---

Do you have the same regard for the Washington Post and the NY Times as you do for Fox and Newsmax?

---

I am not going to argue. Fox, OAN,and Newsmax are tilted toward reactionary, bad journalism. NYT and WaPo I hold in high regard.
They are standard for excellency and integrity.

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

JXL said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

JXL said:

---

Booray said:

---

One of the central premises of Trump's supposed greatness was removing America from never ending wars. Yet when Biden completes the removal of America from a never ending war, the negative consequences are a sign of Biden's ineptitude.

One cannot find a better illustration of blind partisanship.

---

Blind partisanship, anyone?

https://thefederalist.com/2021/04/15/media-cheer-biden-withdrawal-from-afghanistan-after-raising-panic-under-trump/

Media Cheer Biden Withdrawal From Afghanistan After Raising Panic Under Trump
Tristan Justice
Corporate media cheered President Joe Biden's Wednesday announcement of withdrawing remaining U.S. forces in Afghanistan by Sept. 11 this year after the same outlets raised hysteria when President Donald Trump pursued the same policy. The former Republican president announced drawdowns of U.S. troops in 2019 and 2020. He was attacked not only by corporate media but also deliberately undermined and lied to by high-ranking federal personnel.

As outlined in a lengthy Twitter thread by Republican public affairs consultant Drew Holden, legacy outlets met Biden's announcement with a sharp contrast in tone to the hysterical coverage that greeted Trump's same pursuits just months ago.

CNN highlighted testimony from foreign policy professionals opposed to the troop withdrawal while Trump was still president, amplifying those who said the decision to pull down forces in Afghanistan "reckless." For Biden, on the other hand, CNN showed him being praised by former President Barack Obama for "bold leadership."

The New York Times engaged in a similar double-standard, offering "news analysis" of Trump's announcements to pull out of Afghanistan that said it was playing into terrorists' hands. Biden was merely quoted as justifying his decision.

Time Magazine, which refused to call Iranian terrorist Qasem Soleimani a terrorist in January of last year, was no different.

"Can Donald Trump accept defeat in Afghanistan?" the publication questioned under Trump on the premise removal was concession while quoting comedian-journalist Trevor Noah, who compared the strategy to German dictator Adolf Hitler's. Biden on the other hand, enjoyed free advertising.

Over at MSNBC, it's the same story. By withdrawing from Afghanistan after nearly two decades, Trump was engaged in dangerous behavior. Biden, however, is making "the right call."

The Washington Post, which infamously eulogized an ISIS terrorist as an "austere religious leader" in its 2019 obituary, predictably followed suit, highlighting warnings from the Pentagon with Trump's announcement and celebrating Biden when he made the same call.

"Trump administration to cut troop levels in Afghanistan despite Pentagon warnings," the Trump-resistance paper wrote in November.

But under Biden, the paper celebrated that "America's longest war may soon be coming to an end."

NPR also hyped fears among "military leaders" under Trump's decision without the same framing applied to Biden's in the lede.

There is no shortage of blatant double-standards of corporate coverage under the Biden administration White House to the immediate predecessor, even less than six months into the new administration. That's so whether it's the coverage of familial scandal to the sex of the White House communications team to the erosion of norms through the unusual termination of career bureaucrats.

In February, news broke that attorneys at the Justice Department appointed by the previous administration were asked to resign by the Biden administration. When Trump did the same thing in 2017, legacy outlets hysterically charged the president with sparking needless controversy.

---

Don't you just love a good media double standard, I know I do

---

If cherry picking data is one's thing and not noting the OAN, Newmax, and Fox's double standard, too then "Yes, one loves a media double standard."

---

Do you have the same regard for the Washington Post and the NY Times as you do for Fox and Newsmax?

---

I am not going to argue. Fox, OAN,and Newsmax are tilted toward reactionary, bad journalism. NYT and WaPo I hold in high regard.
They are standard for excellency and integrity.

---

they used to be cream of the crop, they are better than MSNBC and CNN.

---

This deleted tweet from a senior Biden State Department official captures the private feelings of many others. pic.twitter.com/uoeEukSerh

— Jonathan Swan (@jonathanvswan) August 13, 2021

Porteroso said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Booray said:

---

One of the central premises of Trump's supposed greatness was removing America from never ending wars. Yet when Biden completes the removal of America from a never ending war, the negative consequences are a sign of Biden's ineptitude.

One cannot find a better illustration of blind partisanship.

---

It doesn't make sense that policing the region for over 20 years with trillions of dollars and lots of dead soldiers has lead us to a situation where the Taliban is able to quickly organize, position, and execute a nation wide offense under the radar of military intelligence.

We need to stay out of the region because we clearly can't do our job.

---

One could argue that destabilizing the Middle East is the exact job the US has given itself. We have toppled everything from democracies to terrorist held regions. We destroy everything when we enter. We've taken countries willfully Westernizing themselves, and given them good reason to hate us and devolve into religious zealotry.

I agree we should stay out. Trump's avoidance of war with Iran was his best quality, even if generals did have to talk him out of it more than once. Hoping Biden can avoid new wars too.

The importance of our normal political disagreements pales in comparison to starting wars.

---

"Will to Fight Analyzing, Modeling, and Simulating the Will to Fight of #Military Units." https://t.co/hlPu3bYZ6p via @SpecGhost

— NewsMilitary.com (@NewsMilitaryCom) September 23, 2018

South Vietnam. Iraq. Afghanistan. Training soldiers without staying long enough for a lieutenant to become a general or building esprit de corps. This @TheAtlantic piece explains partly why U.S.-trained forces collapse so quickly. https://t.co/0eNhjHNWA7

— Husain Haqqani (@husainhaqqani) August 13, 2021

Waco1947 said:

---

JXL said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

JXL said:

---

Booray said:

---

One of the central premises of Trump's supposed greatness was removing America from never ending wars. Yet when Biden completes the removal of America from a never ending war, the negative consequences are a sign of Biden's ineptitude.

One cannot find a better illustration of blind partisanship.

---

Blind partisanship, anyone?

https://thefederalist.com/2021/04/15/media-cheer-biden-withdrawal-from-afghanistan-after-raising-panic-under-trump/

Media Cheer Biden Withdrawal From Afghanistan After Raising Panic Under Trump
Tristan Justice
Corporate media cheered President Joe Biden's Wednesday announcement of withdrawing remaining U.S. forces in Afghanistan by Sept. 11 this year after the same outlets raised hysteria when President Donald Trump pursued the same policy. The former Republican president announced drawdowns of U.S. troops in 2019 and 2020. He was attacked not only by corporate media but also deliberately undermined and lied to by high-ranking federal personnel.

As outlined in a lengthy Twitter thread by Republican public affairs consultant Drew Holden, legacy outlets met Biden's announcement with a sharp contrast in tone to the hysterical coverage that greeted Trump's same pursuits just months ago.

CNN highlighted testimony from foreign policy professionals opposed to the troop withdrawal while Trump was still president, amplifying those who said the decision to pull down forces in Afghanistan "reckless." For Biden, on the other hand, CNN showed him being praised by former President Barack Obama for "bold leadership."

The New York Times engaged in a similar double-standard, offering "news analysis" of Trump's announcements to pull out of Afghanistan that said it was playing into terrorists' hands. Biden was merely quoted as justifying his decision.

Time Magazine, which refused to call Iranian terrorist Qasem Soleimani a terrorist in January of last year, was no different.

"Can Donald Trump accept defeat in Afghanistan?" the publication questioned under Trump on the premise removal was concession while quoting comedian-journalist Trevor Noah, who compared the strategy to German dictator Adolf Hitler's. Biden on the other hand, enjoyed free advertising.

Over at MSNBC, it's the same story. By withdrawing from Afghanistan after nearly two decades, Trump was engaged in dangerous behavior. Biden, however, is making "the right call."

The Washington Post, which infamously eulogized an ISIS terrorist as an "austere religious leader" in its 2019 obituary, predictably followed suit, highlighting warnings from the Pentagon with Trump's announcement and celebrating Biden when he made the same call.

"Trump administration to cut troop levels in Afghanistan despite Pentagon warnings," the Trump-resistance paper wrote in November.

But under Biden, the paper celebrated that "America's longest war may soon be coming to an end."

NPR also hyped fears among "military leaders" under Trump's decision without the same framing applied to Biden's in the lede.

There is no shortage of blatant double-standards of corporate coverage under the Biden administration White House to the immediate predecessor, even less than six months into the new administration. That's so whether it's the coverage of familial scandal to the sex of the White House communications team to the erosion of norms through the unusual termination of career bureaucrats.

In February, news broke that attorneys at the Justice Department appointed by the previous administration were asked to resign by the Biden administration. When Trump did the same thing in 2017, legacy outlets hysterically charged the president with sparking needless controversy.

---

Don't you just love a good media double standard, I know I do

---

If cherry picking data is one's thing and not noting the OAN, Newmax, and Fox's double standard, too then "Yes, one loves a media double standard."

---

Do you have the same regard for the Washington Post and the NY Times as you do for Fox and Newsmax?

---

I am not going to argue. Fox, OAN,and Newsmax are tilted toward reactionary, bad journalism. NYT and WaPo I hold in high regard.
They are standard for excellency and integrity.

---

Booray said:

---

One of the central premises of Trump's supposed greatness was removing America from never ending wars. Yet when Biden completes the removal of America from a never ending war, the negative consequences are a sign of Biden's ineptitude.

One cannot find a better illustration of blind partisanship.

---

JXL said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

JXL said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

JXL said:

---

Booray said:

---

One of the central premises of Trump's supposed greatness was removing America from never ending wars. Yet when Biden completes the removal of America from a never ending war, the negative consequences are a sign of Biden's ineptitude.

One cannot find a better illustration of blind partisanship.

---

Blind partisanship, anyone?

https://thefederalist.com/2021/04/15/media-cheer-biden-withdrawal-from-afghanistan-after-raising-panic-under-trump/

Media Cheer Biden Withdrawal From Afghanistan After Raising Panic Under Trump
Tristan Justice
Corporate media cheered President Joe Biden's Wednesday announcement of withdrawing remaining U.S. forces in Afghanistan by Sept. 11 this year after the same outlets raised hysteria when President Donald Trump pursued the same policy. The former Republican president announced drawdowns of U.S. troops in 2019 and 2020. He was attacked not only by corporate media but also deliberately undermined and lied to by high-ranking federal personnel.

As outlined in a lengthy Twitter thread by Republican public affairs consultant Drew Holden, legacy outlets met Biden's announcement with a sharp contrast in tone to the hysterical coverage that greeted Trump's same pursuits just months ago.

CNN highlighted testimony from foreign policy professionals opposed to the troop withdrawal while Trump was still president, amplifying those who said the decision to pull down forces in Afghanistan "reckless." For Biden, on the other hand, CNN showed him being praised by former President Barack Obama for "bold leadership."

The New York Times engaged in a similar double-standard, offering "news analysis" of Trump's announcements to pull out of Afghanistan that said it was playing into terrorists' hands. Biden was merely quoted as justifying his decision.

Time Magazine, which refused to call Iranian terrorist Qasem Soleimani a terrorist in January of last year, was no different.

"Can Donald Trump accept defeat in Afghanistan?" the publication questioned under Trump on the premise removal was concession while quoting comedian-journalist Trevor Noah, who compared the strategy to German dictator Adolf Hitler's. Biden on the other hand, enjoyed free advertising.

Over at MSNBC, it's the same story. By withdrawing from Afghanistan after nearly two decades, Trump was engaged in dangerous behavior. Biden, however, is making "the right call."

The Washington Post, which infamously eulogized an ISIS terrorist as an "austere religious leader" in its 2019 obituary, predictably followed suit, highlighting warnings from the Pentagon with Trump's announcement and celebrating Biden when he made the same call.

"Trump administration to cut troop levels in Afghanistan despite Pentagon warnings," the Trump-resistance paper wrote in November.

But under Biden, the paper celebrated that "America's longest war may soon be coming to an end."

NPR also hyped fears among "military leaders" under Trump's decision without the same framing applied to Biden's in the lede.

There is no shortage of blatant double-standards of corporate coverage under the Biden administration White House to the immediate predecessor, even less than six months into the new administration. That's so whether it's the coverage of familial scandal to the sex of the White House communications team to the erosion of norms through the unusual termination of career bureaucrats.

In February, news broke that attorneys at the Justice Department appointed by the previous administration were asked to resign by the Biden administration. When Trump did the same thing in 2017, legacy outlets hysterically charged the president with sparking needless controversy.

---

Don't you just love a good media double standard, I know I do

---

If cherry picking data is one's thing and not noting the OAN, Newmax, and Fox's double standard, too then "Yes, one loves a media double standard."

---

Do you have the same regard for the Washington Post and the NY Times as you do for Fox and Newsmax?

---

I am not going to argue. Fox, OAN,and Newsmax are tilted toward reactionary, bad journalism. NYT and WaPo I hold in high regard.
They are standard for excellency and integrity.

---

Then why did you compare them as examples of media outlets with double standards?

---

US intelligence agencies who said just 4 days ago that Kabul could fall in 90 days have revised the figure to 72 hours
https://t.co/v2XUuPVcKX

— Bruno Maçães (@MacaesBruno) August 14, 2021

This is the real-life Handmaid's Tale. A true cautionary tale for the U.S., which has our own far religious right dreaming of a theocracy that would impose a particular brand of Christianity, drive women from the workforce and solely into childbirth, and control all politics. https://t.co/R1lSCSUVwv

— Joy-Ann (Pro-Democracy) Reid 😷 (@JoyAnnReid) August 14, 2021

#BREAKING: Kabul in complete blackout, heavy fighting going on. pic.twitter.com/EHYuh0TNfs

— Amichai Stein (@AmichaiStein1) August 14, 2021

Jack Bauer said:

---

#BREAKING: Kabul in complete blackout, heavy fighting going on. pic.twitter.com/EHYuh0TNfs

— Amichai Stein (@AmichaiStein1) August 14, 2021

---

Let’s recap how astonishing the collapse of Afghanistan has been: before last week, the Taliban had only captured one major city since 2001 - Kunduz in 2015 - and only for a few days.

Now, in the span of 8 days, they have seized everything but Kabul.

— Sune Engel Rasmussen (@SuneEngel) August 14, 2021

JXL said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

JXL said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

JXL said:

---

Booray said:

---

One of the central premises of Trump's supposed greatness was removing America from never ending wars. Yet when Biden completes the removal of America from a never ending war, the negative consequences are a sign of Biden's ineptitude.

One cannot find a better illustration of blind partisanship.

---

Blind partisanship, anyone?

https://thefederalist.com/2021/04/15/media-cheer-biden-withdrawal-from-afghanistan-after-raising-panic-under-trump/

Media Cheer Biden Withdrawal From Afghanistan After Raising Panic Under Trump
Tristan Justice
Corporate media cheered President Joe Biden's Wednesday announcement of withdrawing remaining U.S. forces in Afghanistan by Sept. 11 this year after the same outlets raised hysteria when President Donald Trump pursued the same policy. The former Republican president announced drawdowns of U.S. troops in 2019 and 2020. He was attacked not only by corporate media but also deliberately undermined and lied to by high-ranking federal personnel.

As outlined in a lengthy Twitter thread by Republican public affairs consultant Drew Holden, legacy outlets met Biden's announcement with a sharp contrast in tone to the hysterical coverage that greeted Trump's same pursuits just months ago.

CNN highlighted testimony from foreign policy professionals opposed to the troop withdrawal while Trump was still president, amplifying those who said the decision to pull down forces in Afghanistan "reckless." For Biden, on the other hand, CNN showed him being praised by former President Barack Obama for "bold leadership."

The New York Times engaged in a similar double-standard, offering "news analysis" of Trump's announcements to pull out of Afghanistan that said it was playing into terrorists' hands. Biden was merely quoted as justifying his decision.

Time Magazine, which refused to call Iranian terrorist Qasem Soleimani a terrorist in January of last year, was no different.

"Can Donald Trump accept defeat in Afghanistan?" the publication questioned under Trump on the premise removal was concession while quoting comedian-journalist Trevor Noah, who compared the strategy to German dictator Adolf Hitler's. Biden on the other hand, enjoyed free advertising.

Over at MSNBC, it's the same story. By withdrawing from Afghanistan after nearly two decades, Trump was engaged in dangerous behavior. Biden, however, is making "the right call."

The Washington Post, which infamously eulogized an ISIS terrorist as an "austere religious leader" in its 2019 obituary, predictably followed suit, highlighting warnings from the Pentagon with Trump's announcement and celebrating Biden when he made the same call.

"Trump administration to cut troop levels in Afghanistan despite Pentagon warnings," the Trump-resistance paper wrote in November.

But under Biden, the paper celebrated that "America's longest war may soon be coming to an end."

NPR also hyped fears among "military leaders" under Trump's decision without the same framing applied to Biden's in the lede.

There is no shortage of blatant double-standards of corporate coverage under the Biden administration White House to the immediate predecessor, even less than six months into the new administration. That's so whether it's the coverage of familial scandal to the sex of the White House communications team to the erosion of norms through the unusual termination of career bureaucrats.

In February, news broke that attorneys at the Justice Department appointed by the previous administration were asked to resign by the Biden administration. When Trump did the same thing in 2017, legacy outlets hysterically charged the president with sparking needless controversy.

---

Don't you just love a good media double standard, I know I do

---

If cherry picking data is one's thing and not noting the OAN, Newmax, and Fox's double standard, too then "Yes, one loves a media double standard."

---

Do you have the same regard for the Washington Post and the NY Times as you do for Fox and Newsmax?

---

I am not going to argue. Fox, OAN,and Newsmax are tilted toward reactionary, bad journalism. NYT and WaPo I hold in high regard.
They are standard for excellency and integrity.

---

Then why did you compare them as examples of media outlets with double standards?

---

Waco1947 said:

---

JXL said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

JXL said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

JXL said:

---

Booray said:

---

One of the central premises of Trump's supposed greatness was removing America from never ending wars. Yet when Biden completes the removal of America from a never ending war, the negative consequences are a sign of Biden's ineptitude.

One cannot find a better illustration of blind partisanship.

---

Blind partisanship, anyone?

https://thefederalist.com/2021/04/15/media-cheer-biden-withdrawal-from-afghanistan-after-raising-panic-under-trump/

Media Cheer Biden Withdrawal From Afghanistan After Raising Panic Under Trump
Tristan Justice
Corporate media cheered President Joe Biden's Wednesday announcement of withdrawing remaining U.S. forces in Afghanistan by Sept. 11 this year after the same outlets raised hysteria when President Donald Trump pursued the same policy. The former Republican president announced drawdowns of U.S. troops in 2019 and 2020. He was attacked not only by corporate media but also deliberately undermined and lied to by high-ranking federal personnel.

As outlined in a lengthy Twitter thread by Republican public affairs consultant Drew Holden, legacy outlets met Biden's announcement with a sharp contrast in tone to the hysterical coverage that greeted Trump's same pursuits just months ago.

CNN highlighted testimony from foreign policy professionals opposed to the troop withdrawal while Trump was still president, amplifying those who said the decision to pull down forces in Afghanistan "reckless." For Biden, on the other hand, CNN showed him being praised by former President Barack Obama for "bold leadership."

The New York Times engaged in a similar double-standard, offering "news analysis" of Trump's announcements to pull out of Afghanistan that said it was playing into terrorists' hands. Biden was merely quoted as justifying his decision.

Time Magazine, which refused to call Iranian terrorist Qasem Soleimani a terrorist in January of last year, was no different.

"Can Donald Trump accept defeat in Afghanistan?" the publication questioned under Trump on the premise removal was concession while quoting comedian-journalist Trevor Noah, who compared the strategy to German dictator Adolf Hitler's. Biden on the other hand, enjoyed free advertising.

Over at MSNBC, it's the same story. By withdrawing from Afghanistan after nearly two decades, Trump was engaged in dangerous behavior. Biden, however, is making "the right call."

The Washington Post, which infamously eulogized an ISIS terrorist as an "austere religious leader" in its 2019 obituary, predictably followed suit, highlighting warnings from the Pentagon with Trump's announcement and celebrating Biden when he made the same call.

"Trump administration to cut troop levels in Afghanistan despite Pentagon warnings," the Trump-resistance paper wrote in November.

But under Biden, the paper celebrated that "America's longest war may soon be coming to an end."

NPR also hyped fears among "military leaders" under Trump's decision without the same framing applied to Biden's in the lede.

There is no shortage of blatant double-standards of corporate coverage under the Biden administration White House to the immediate predecessor, even less than six months into the new administration. That's so whether it's the coverage of familial scandal to the sex of the White House communications team to the erosion of norms through the unusual termination of career bureaucrats.

In February, news broke that attorneys at the Justice Department appointed by the previous administration were asked to resign by the Biden administration. When Trump did the same thing in 2017, legacy outlets hysterically charged the president with sparking needless controversy.

---

Don't you just love a good media double standard, I know I do

---

If cherry picking data is one's thing and not noting the OAN, Newmax, and Fox's double standard, too then "Yes, one loves a media double standard."

---

Do you have the same regard for the Washington Post and the NY Times as you do for Fox and Newsmax?

---

I am not going to argue. Fox, OAN,and Newsmax are tilted toward reactionary, bad journalism. NYT and WaPo I hold in high regard.
They are standard for excellency and integrity.

---

Then why did you compare them as examples of media outlets with double standards?

---

Let's go with stupid.

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

JXL said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

JXL said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

JXL said:

---

Booray said:

---

One of the central premises of Trump's supposed greatness was removing America from never ending wars. Yet when Biden completes the removal of America from a never ending war, the negative consequences are a sign of Biden's ineptitude.

One cannot find a better illustration of blind partisanship.

---

Blind partisanship, anyone?

https://thefederalist.com/2021/04/15/media-cheer-biden-withdrawal-from-afghanistan-after-raising-panic-under-trump/

Media Cheer Biden Withdrawal From Afghanistan After Raising Panic Under Trump
Tristan Justice
Corporate media cheered President Joe Biden's Wednesday announcement of withdrawing remaining U.S. forces in Afghanistan by Sept. 11 this year after the same outlets raised hysteria when President Donald Trump pursued the same policy. The former Republican president announced drawdowns of U.S. troops in 2019 and 2020. He was attacked not only by corporate media but also deliberately undermined and lied to by high-ranking federal personnel.

As outlined in a lengthy Twitter thread by Republican public affairs consultant Drew Holden, legacy outlets met Biden's announcement with a sharp contrast in tone to the hysterical coverage that greeted Trump's same pursuits just months ago.

CNN highlighted testimony from foreign policy professionals opposed to the troop withdrawal while Trump was still president, amplifying those who said the decision to pull down forces in Afghanistan "reckless." For Biden, on the other hand, CNN showed him being praised by former President Barack Obama for "bold leadership."

The New York Times engaged in a similar double-standard, offering "news analysis" of Trump's announcements to pull out of Afghanistan that said it was playing into terrorists' hands. Biden was merely quoted as justifying his decision.

Time Magazine, which refused to call Iranian terrorist Qasem Soleimani a terrorist in January of last year, was no different.

"Can Donald Trump accept defeat in Afghanistan?" the publication questioned under Trump on the premise removal was concession while quoting comedian-journalist Trevor Noah, who compared the strategy to German dictator Adolf Hitler's. Biden on the other hand, enjoyed free advertising.

Over at MSNBC, it's the same story. By withdrawing from Afghanistan after nearly two decades, Trump was engaged in dangerous behavior. Biden, however, is making "the right call."

The Washington Post, which infamously eulogized an ISIS terrorist as an "austere religious leader" in its 2019 obituary, predictably followed suit, highlighting warnings from the Pentagon with Trump's announcement and celebrating Biden when he made the same call.

"Trump administration to cut troop levels in Afghanistan despite Pentagon warnings," the Trump-resistance paper wrote in November.

But under Biden, the paper celebrated that "America's longest war may soon be coming to an end."

NPR also hyped fears among "military leaders" under Trump's decision without the same framing applied to Biden's in the lede.

There is no shortage of blatant double-standards of corporate coverage under the Biden administration White House to the immediate predecessor, even less than six months into the new administration. That's so whether it's the coverage of familial scandal to the sex of the White House communications team to the erosion of norms through the unusual termination of career bureaucrats.

In February, news broke that attorneys at the Justice Department appointed by the previous administration were asked to resign by the Biden administration. When Trump did the same thing in 2017, legacy outlets hysterically charged the president with sparking needless controversy.

---

Don't you just love a good media double standard, I know I do

---

If cherry picking data is one's thing and not noting the OAN, Newmax, and Fox's double standard, too then "Yes, one loves a media double standard."

---

Do you have the same regard for the Washington Post and the NY Times as you do for Fox and Newsmax?

---

I am not going to argue. Fox, OAN,and Newsmax are tilted toward reactionary, bad journalism. NYT and WaPo I hold in high regard.
They are standard for excellency and integrity.

---

Then why did you compare them as examples of media outlets with double standards?

---

Let's go with stupid.

---

self-reflection, that's good.

---

“There's going to be no circumstance where you see people lifted off the roof of an Embassy of the United States of America from Afghanistan”

- Joe Biden, July 8, 2021pic.twitter.com/R1qnnTvyoX

— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) August 15, 2021

Jack Bauer said:

---

“There's going to be no circumstance where you see people lifted off the roof of an Embassy of the United States of America from Afghanistan”

- Joe Biden, July 8, 2021pic.twitter.com/R1qnnTvyoX

— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) August 15, 2021

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Jack Bauer said:

---

“There's going to be no circumstance where you see people lifted off the roof of an Embassy of the United States of America from Afghanistan”

- Joe Biden, July 8, 2021pic.twitter.com/R1qnnTvyoX

— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) August 15, 2021

---

What's your solution?

---