D. C. Bear said:
whiterock said:
AZ_Bear said:
D. C. Bear said:
Doc Holliday said:
In fairness, it is false to say "The FDA promised 90+% vaccine efficacy." The FDA promised to approve vaccines with 50 percent efficacy against infection or serious illness.
In fairness, not everyone is as smart and educated as you.
What you say might be technically true while still completely false with regards to the general narrative at the time that the uneducated public was hearing.
You're an apologist for fine print.
I do believe, however, it would be correct to say the FDA approved vaccines which promised 90% efficacy or greater.
Against the initial variants, the initial vaccines (some of them, anyway) did demonstrate 90 percent efficiency.
That's hilarious and false.
Around 90%of the vaccinated didn't die from Covid, but that is also true for the unvaccinated.
The same percentage of people got Covid regardless of vaccine status.
The vaccines do very little to benefit anyone. Maybe... MAYBE they lower the need for hospitalized a little... maybe.
Most importantly, these are NOT vaccines.
How many people with the polio vaccine got polio? Measles? Mumps? Rubella?
These are NOT vaccines.
The moving targets is amazing.
"If you get the vaccine, you won't get infected."
"You might get infected, but you won't transmit the disease."
You might get it and still transmit, but you won't get a severe case requiring hospital."
"You might go to the hospital, but you won't die."
"Some people might die, but it dramatically lowers the chances of severe cases & death."
"Ok, maybe it just lowers the chances by a little."
So we went from impossible to get our transmit Covid, to maybe it slightly lowers the chance of a severe case... maybe.
Yeah, that's some kind of "vaccine". Can you name another vaccine with an equally horrible track record? I can't think of one. Even the annual flu vaccine are more effective than this nonsense.